Literature DB >> 7722762

Clinical reproducibility of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

P Williams-Russo1, J H Healey, T P Szatrowski, R Schneider, S Paget, K Ales, P Schwartzberg.   

Abstract

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is a technique advocated for the measurement of bone mass throughout the skeleton, and recently it has been used to measure changes in periprosthetic bone mass after joint replacement. The accuracy and precision of the method in clinical patient populations have not been firmly established. This study sought to establish the short-term reproducibility of measurements made with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of multiple sites in a large sample of elderly patients with rheumatic disease. Reproducibility was assessed in the lumbar spine and in three femoral sites in 69 patients participating in a longitudinal clinical trial. In each patient, absorptiometry was performed twice in the same day at as many as five time points over a 2-year period. The mean (+/- SD) baseline bone density was 0.783 +/- 0.128 g/cm2 for the femoral neck and 1.015 +/- 0.218 g/cm2 for the lumbar spine. The correlations between the duplicate baseline measurements of the spine were excellent (r = 0.9936, p < 0.001) and were stable over the 2-year period; the mean difference between the duplicate baseline measurements was 1.82 +/- 1.54% and the mean coefficient of variation was 1.29%. Measurements in the femur were much less precise; these values were 3.61 +/- 3.14% and 2.55% in the femoral neck, 3.66 +/- 4.35% and 2.59% in the greater trochanter, and 5.28 +/- 5.61% and 3.73% in Ward's triangle. This study evaluated the short-term reproducibility of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in a clinical population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7722762     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100130213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  5 in total

1.  The 2002 Canadian bone densitometry recommendations: take-home messages.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Long-term periprosthetic remodeling in THA shows structural preservation.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women.

Authors:  G Liu; M Peacock; O Eilam; G Dorulla; E Braunstein; C C Johnston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A randomized controlled trial of salmon calcitonin to prevent bone loss in corticosteroid-treated temporal arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica.

Authors:  J H Healey; S A Paget; P Williams-Russo; T P Szatrowski; R Schneider; H Spiera; H Mitnick; K Ales; P Schwartzberg
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Spinal coronal profiles and proximal femur bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Rui-Qiang Chen; Kota Watanabe; Naobumi Hosogane; Tomohiro Hikata; Akio Iwanami; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.