Literature DB >> 23764717

A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Xu Lili1, Hu Zhiyong, Shen Jianjun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The GlideScope (GS) video laryngoscope has been proven to be a suitable intubating device for a predicted difficult intubation. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) presented with particularly challenging airway management problems to the anesthesiologists. The benefits of using a GS in these patients have not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the GS, in comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope, when performing nasotracheal intubation in patients with AS under general anesthesia.
METHODS: A total of 60 ASA I-II patients with AS were randomly assigned to undergo nasotracheal intubation using either the GS or the Macintosh laryngoscope. Preoperative airway assessments were performed in an attempt to predict the difficulty of tracheal intubation. Duration and number of intubation attempts, success rates, number of optimization maneuvers, Cormack and Lehane grades, Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) scores for each attempt, and difficulty of device use (VAS difficulty scores) were recorded. Complications associated with intubation were also recorded.
RESULTS: The rate of successful nasotracheal intubation was lower with the Macintosh laryngoscope (70%) compared with the GS (96.7%). In comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the GS significantly reduced the intubation difficulty score, duration of tracheal intubation attempts, need for optimization maneuvers, and improved the Cormack and Lehane grade obtained during laryngoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The GS reduced the difficulty of tracheal intubation and provided a better laryngoscopic view with higher overall success rates and shorter duration of intubation attempts than the Macintosh laryngoscope. In our study, the GS proved to be a better alternative in most cases, compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, for intubating AS patients who preferred their airway management under general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23764717     DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31829a0491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the Airtraq laryngoscope and the GlideScope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jie Yi; Yahong Gong; Xiang Quan; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  GlideScope and Frova Introducer for Difficult Airway Management.

Authors:  Alessandra Ciccozzi; Chiara Angeletti; Cristiana Guetti; Roberta Papola; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Antonella Paladini; Giustino Varrassi; Franco Marinangeli
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08-07

3.  Evaluation of 2 ultrasonic indicators as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in pregnant women: A prospective, double blinded study.

Authors:  Lili Xu; Shaobing Dai; Lihong Sun; Jianjun Shen; Changcheng Lv; Xinzhong Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope, McGrath video laryngoscope, and Pentax Airway Scope in paediatric nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Yun Jeong Chae; Young Bok Lee; Sujin Kim; Jaemoon Lee; Dae Hee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A comparison of McGrath MAC, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh direct laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun Jeong Chae; Dae Hee Kim; Eun Jeong Park; Juyeon Oh; In Kyong Yi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Kwon Hui Seo; Kyung Mi Kim; Hyunji John; Joo Hyun Jun; Minsoo Han; Soyoun Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  A randomized controlled trial comparing McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Reshma Ambulkar; Priya Ranganathan; Sukhada Savarkar; Jigeeshu V Divatia
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-18

8.  Case Report: Double Visualization Intubation Strategy for Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Wei-Can Chen; Shu Lin; He-Fan He
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-18

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hrishikesh Hazarika; Anudeep Saxena; Pradeep Meshram; Ajay Kumar Bhargava
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.