Literature DB >> 2376431

Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer risk factors and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study.

B L de Stavola1, I H Gravelle, D Y Wang, D S Allen, R D Bulbrook, I S Fentiman, J L Hayward, M C Chaudary.   

Abstract

A prospective study has been conducted on 4954 female volunteers from the Island of Guernsey between 1977 and 1985 to examine risk factors for breast cancer and their relationship to mammographic parenchymal patterns as assessed by Wolfe's method of grading. Up to September 1988, 69 women had developed breast cancer, 11 of whom were prevalent cases being diagnosed within six months of mammography. The remaining incident cases were diagnosed six to 126 months (median 65 months) after entry to the study. Univariate analysis showed that the distribution of Wolfe grades in the population was significantly associated with menopausal status, age, parity, adiposity, age at menarche, age at first childbirth and use of oral contraception, but not with a family history of breast cancer. Multivariate analysis of the data for these variables from either pre- and/or post-menopausal women indicated that age, parity and adiposity were significantly related to Wolfe grade pattern. Age had an opposite effect in pre- compared with postmenopausal women thus the probability of either a P2 or DY pattern increased with increasing age in premenopausal but decreased in postmenopausal women so that incidence peaked around the menopause. Other variables did not achieve significance in the multivariate analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for women with P2 or DY patterns using those with N1 or P1 grades as the reference group. The ORs were determined at two censoring times; one at five years and the other to include the most recent follow-up of this cohort. The ORs were adjusted for years of follow-up, age and adiposity and in postmenopausal women adjustment was also made for age at menarche.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2376431     DOI: 10.1093/ije/19.2.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of mammographic parenchymal patterns in premenopausal Japanese and British women.

Authors:  I H Gravelle; R D Bulbrook; D Y Wang; D Allen; J L Hayward; J C Bulstrode; O Takatani
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Mammographic density is not a worthwhile examination to distinguish high cancer risk women in screening.

Authors:  Catherine Colin; Anne-Marie Schott; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral; Diana Bull; Barbara Crossley; Moya Simmonds; Elizabeth Hilton; Stephen Bailey; Nigel Barrett; Peter Briers; Ruth English; Alan Jackson; Elizabeth Kutt; Janet Lavelle; Linda Rockall; Matthew G Wallis; Mary Wilson; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

4.  Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study.

Authors:  Gillian S Dite; Lyle C Gurrin; Graham B Byrnes; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Margaret R E McCredie; Dallas R English; Graham G Giles; Jennifer Cawson; Robert A Hegele; Anna M Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States).

Authors:  Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Anna N A Tosteson; Claudia Kasales; Julia Weiss; Martha Goodrich; Elizabeth E Hatch; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Sala; R Warren; J McCann; S Duffy; R Luben; N Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shayan Shaghayeq Nazari; Pinku Mukherjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.239

8.  Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women.

Authors:  I T Gram; E Funkhouser; L Tabar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort.

Authors:  V A McCormack; I dos Santos Silva; B L De Stavola; N Perry; S Vinnicombe; A J Swerdlow; R Hardy; D Kuh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.