| Literature DB >> 23762598 |
Nan Wang1, Liqin Zhu, Xuequn Zhao, Wenjie Yang, He Sun.
Abstract
Objective. To develop a simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for measuring moxifloxacin concentration in human plasma. Methods. Following a single step liquid-liquid extraction, analytes along with an internal standard (IS) were separated using an isocratic mobile phase of 0.1% triethylamine (adjusted pH to 4.8 with phosphoric acid)/acetonitrile (80/20, v/v) at flow rate of 1 mL/min on reverse phase Kromasil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μ m) at room temperature. Results. Total analytical run time for selecting moxifloxacin was 15 min. The assays exhibited good linearity (r (2) = 0.9998) over the studied range of 25 to 5000 ng/mL. The absolute recovery rate of low, medium, and high concentrations were 69.88%, 78.86%, and 78.51%, respectively. The relative recovery rates were 98.50%, 96.61%, and 101.79%, respectively. Coefficient of variation and error at both of the intraday and interday assessments were less than 4.7%. Conclusions. The results indicated that this method is a simple, rapid, precise and accurate assay for the determination of moxifloxacin concentrations in human plasma. This validated method is sensitive and reproducible enough to be used in pharmacokinetic studies.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762598 PMCID: PMC3677634 DOI: 10.1155/2013/462918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharmacol ISSN: 2090-5165
Figure 1Chromatogram. 1: IS (ciprofloxacin). 2: moxifloxacin.
Calibration curve (n = 5, ).
| Actual concentration ( | Peak area ratio |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 0.025 | 0.098 ± 0.007 |
| 0.05 | 0.129 ± 0.006 |
| 0.1 | 0.304 ± 0.016 |
| 0.5 | 1.452 ± 0.030 |
| 1.0 | 2.901 ± 0.042 |
| 2.5 | 7.740 ± 0.249 |
| 5.0 | 15.190 ± 0.194 |
Figure 2Calibration curve of moxifloxacin in plasma (n = 5).
Repeatability (n = 6).
| Actual concentration ( | Peak area ratio |
| RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1.507 | 1.496 ± 0.020 | 1.31 |
| 1.477 | |||
| 1.485 | |||
| 1.496 | |||
| 1.483 | |||
| 1.530 |
Intraday precision n = 5, ).
| Actual concentration ( | Determined concentration ( | Peak area ratio | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.049 ± 0.002 | 0.129 ± 0.005 | 4.12 |
| 0.5 | 0.480 ± 0.022 | 1.442 ± 0.045 | 3.12 |
| 2.5 | 2.632 ± 0.056 | 8.007 ± 0.148 | 1.85 |
Interday precision (n = 5, ).
| Actual concentration ( | Determined concentration | Peak area ratio | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.050 ± 0.003 | 0.131 ± 0.006 | 4.70 |
| 0.5 | 0.481 ± 0.008 | 1.447 ± 0.017 | 1.16 |
| 2.5 | 2.537 ± 0.127 | 7.717 ± 0.261 | 3.38 |
Extraction recovery (n = 5).
| Actual concentration ( | Peak area obtained by the direct injection of pure standard analyte in mobile phase | Peak area of the analyte extracted from the plasma | Extraction recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 16211 | 11328 ± 517 | 69.88 ± 3.19 |
| 0.5 | 161033 | 126989 ± 6632 | 78.86 ± 4.12 |
| 2.5 | 857954 | 673543 ± 20935 | 78.51 ± 2.44 |
Method recovery (n = 5, ).
| Actual concentration | Determined concentration | Method recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.049 ± 0.002 | 98.50 ± 3.95 | 4.01 |
| 0.5 | 0.483 ± 0.010 | 96.61 ± 1.98 | 2.05 |
| 2.5 | 2.545 ± 0.082 | 101.79 ± 3.26 | 3.21 |