BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of type 2 diabetes in Germany is of major societal interest, as is the question of the predictive value of genetic and acquired risk factors. METHODS: We present clinically relevant aspects of these topics on the basis of a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a PubMed search that centered on population-based studies. RESULTS: The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland [DEGS1], 2008-2011) revealed that diabetes was diagnosed in 7.2% of the population aged 18 to 79 years (women 7.4%, men 7.0%). These figures are two percentage points higher than those found in the preceding national survey (1998). The percentage of cases that were not captured by these surveys is estimated at 2% to 7% depending on the method. Independently of personal factors (the individual's life style), it seems that living in a disadvantaged region characterized by high unemployment, air pollution, and poor infrastructure raises the risk of diabetes. Moreover, type 2 diabetes has a substantial hereditary component. More than 60 genetic regions have been identified to date that affect the risk of type 2 diabetes, yet all of them together account for only 10% to 15% of the genetic background of the disease. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Germany has risen in recent years. The discovery of new genetic variants that confer a higher risk of developing the disease has improved our understanding of insulin secretion in diabetes pathogenesis rather than the prediction of individual diabetes risk ("personalized medicine").
BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of type 2 diabetes in Germany is of major societal interest, as is the question of the predictive value of genetic and acquired risk factors. METHODS: We present clinically relevant aspects of these topics on the basis of a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a PubMed search that centered on population-based studies. RESULTS: The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland [DEGS1], 2008-2011) revealed that diabetes was diagnosed in 7.2% of the population aged 18 to 79 years (women 7.4%, men 7.0%). These figures are two percentage points higher than those found in the preceding national survey (1998). The percentage of cases that were not captured by these surveys is estimated at 2% to 7% depending on the method. Independently of personal factors (the individual's life style), it seems that living in a disadvantaged region characterized by high unemployment, air pollution, and poor infrastructure raises the risk of diabetes. Moreover, type 2 diabetes has a substantial hereditary component. More than 60 genetic regions have been identified to date that affect the risk of type 2 diabetes, yet all of them together account for only 10% to 15% of the genetic background of the disease. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Germany has risen in recent years. The discovery of new genetic variants that confer a higher risk of developing the disease has improved our understanding of insulin secretion in diabetes pathogenesis rather than the prediction of individual diabetes risk ("personalized medicine").
Authors: Esther A Molenaar; Erik J C Van Ameijden; Diederick E Grobbee; Mattijs E Numans Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: S Schipf; A Werner; T Tamayo; R Holle; M Schunk; W Maier; C Meisinger; B Thorand; K Berger; G Mueller; S Moebus; B Bokhof; A Kluttig; K H Greiser; H Neuhauser; U Ellert; A Icks; W Rathmann; H Völzke Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Richard Redon; Shumpei Ishikawa; Karen R Fitch; Lars Feuk; George H Perry; T Daniel Andrews; Heike Fiegler; Michael H Shapero; Andrew R Carson; Wenwei Chen; Eun Kyung Cho; Stephanie Dallaire; Jennifer L Freeman; Juan R González; Mònica Gratacòs; Jing Huang; Dimitrios Kalaitzopoulos; Daisuke Komura; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Christian R Marshall; Rui Mei; Lyndal Montgomery; Kunihiro Nishimura; Kohji Okamura; Fan Shen; Martin J Somerville; Joelle Tchinda; Armand Valsesia; Cara Woodwark; Fengtang Yang; Junjun Zhang; Tatiana Zerjal; Jane Zhang; Lluis Armengol; Donald F Conrad; Xavier Estivill; Chris Tyler-Smith; Nigel P Carter; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Charles Lee; Keith W Jones; Stephen W Scherer; Matthew E Hurles Journal: Nature Date: 2006-11-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bastiaan T Heijmans; Elmar W Tobi; Aryeh D Stein; Hein Putter; Gerard J Blauw; Ezra S Susser; P Eline Slagboom; L H Lumey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Susanne R de Rooij; Rebecca C Painter; David I W Phillips; Clive Osmond; Robert P J Michels; Ian F Godsland; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Otto P Bleker; Tessa J Roseboom Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michael W J Boehme; Gisela Buechele; Julia Frankenhauser-Mannuss; Jana Mueller; Dietlinde Lump; Bernhard O Boehm; Dietrich Rothenbacher Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.295