| Literature DB >> 23762127 |
Jo Lynne W Robins1, Nancy L McCain, R K Elswick, Jeanne M Walter, D Patricia Gray, Inez Tuck.
Abstract
Objective. In a randomized trial of women with early stage breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, two stress management interventions, tai chi training and spiritual growth groups, were compared to a usual care control group, to evaluate psychosocial functioning, quality of life (QOL), and biological markers thought to reflect cancer- and treatment-specific mechanisms. Method. The sample consisted of 145 women aged 27-75 years; 75% were Caucasian and 25% African American. A total of 109 participants completed the study, yielding a 75% retention rate. Grounded in a psychoneuroimmunology framework, the overarching hypothesis was that both interventions would reduce perceived stress, enhance QOL and psychosocial functioning, normalize levels of stress-related neuroendocrine mediators, and attenuate immunosuppression. Results. While interesting patterns were seen across the sample and over time, the interventions had no appreciable effects when delivered during the period of chemotherapy. Conclusions. Findings highlight the complex nature of biobehavioral interventions in relation to treatment trajectories and potential outcomes. Psychosocial interventions like these may lack sufficient power to overcome the psychosocial or physiological stress experienced during the chemotherapy treatment period. It may be that interventions requiring less activity and/or group attendance would have enhanced therapeutic effects, and more active interventions need to be tested prior to and following recovery from chemotherapy.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762127 PMCID: PMC3666296 DOI: 10.1155/2013/372908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Study design.
Figure 2Perceived stress scores (IES) for groups over time.
Psychological well-being and quality of life: means (SE) for total sample over time.
| Measure | Time | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Ix | Post-Ix | F/U 1 | F/U 2 | |
| IES* | 16.92 (0.69) | 13.75 (0.72) | 12.85 (0.78) | 12.63 (0.80) |
| FACT-B† | 105.19 (2.03) | 102.96 (2.12) | 110.19 (2.20) | 110.63 (2.27) |
*Means are significantly different over time (P < 0.0001) with Pre-Ix mean significantly greater than Post-Ix, F/U 1, and F/U 2 means.
†Means are significantly different over time (P < 0.0001) with Pre-Ix and Post-Ix means significantly greater than F/U 1 and F/U 2 means.
Figure 3Depressive symptom scores (CES-D) for groups over time.
Figure 4Urinary endorphin levels by group over time. Means in boxes are back-transformed from loge (natural log) used for analysis and are shown for timepoints with significantly different values only.
Figure 5IL-1β levels by group over time.
Figure 6IFN-γ levels by group over time. Means in boxes are back-transformed from loge (natural log) used for analysis and are shown for timepoints with significantly different values only.