P J Klein1, Roger Schneider2, C J Rhoads3. 1. S.U.N.Y. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. kleinqpj@roadrunner.com. 2. Village of Healing and Wellness, St Catharines, ON, Canada. 3. Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This review (a) assesses the strength of evidence addressing Qigong therapy in supportive cancer care and (b) provides insights for definition of effective Qigong therapy in supportive cancer care. METHODS: This mixed-methods study includes (a) a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines and (b) a constant-comparative qualitative analysis of effective intervention protocols. RESULTS: Eleven published randomized clinical trials were reviewed. A total of 831 individuals were studied. Geographic settings include the USA, Australia, China, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. Qigong therapy was found to have positive effects on the cancer-specific QOL, fatigue, immune function, and cortisol levels of individuals with cancer. Qigong therapy protocols varied supporting a plurality of styles. Qualitative analyses identified common programming constructs. Content constructs included exercise (gentle, integrated, repetitious, flowing, weight-bearing movements), breath regulation, mindfulness and meditation, energy cultivation including self-massage, and emphasis on relaxation. Logistic constructs included delivery by qualified instructors, home practice, and accommodation for impaired activity tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: There is global interest and a growing body of research providing evidence of therapeutic effect of Qigong therapy in supportive cancer care. While Qigong therapy protocols vary in style, construct commonalities do exist. Knowledge of the common constructs among effective programs revealed in this research may be used to guide future research intervention protocol and community programming design and development.
PURPOSE: This review (a) assesses the strength of evidence addressing Qigong therapy in supportive cancer care and (b) provides insights for definition of effective Qigong therapy in supportive cancer care. METHODS: This mixed-methods study includes (a) a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines and (b) a constant-comparative qualitative analysis of effective intervention protocols. RESULTS: Eleven published randomized clinical trials were reviewed. A total of 831 individuals were studied. Geographic settings include the USA, Australia, China, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. Qigong therapy was found to have positive effects on the cancer-specific QOL, fatigue, immune function, and cortisol levels of individuals with cancer. Qigong therapy protocols varied supporting a plurality of styles. Qualitative analyses identified common programming constructs. Content constructs included exercise (gentle, integrated, repetitious, flowing, weight-bearing movements), breath regulation, mindfulness and meditation, energy cultivation including self-massage, and emphasis on relaxation. Logistic constructs included delivery by qualified instructors, home practice, and accommodation for impaired activity tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: There is global interest and a growing body of research providing evidence of therapeutic effect of Qigong therapy in supportive cancer care. While Qigong therapy protocols vary in style, construct commonalities do exist. Knowledge of the common constructs among effective programs revealed in this research may be used to guide future research intervention protocol and community programming design and development.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Construct analysis; Content analysis; Qigong; Qualitative; Review; Tai chi
Authors: Michael R Irwin; Richard Olmstead; Elizabeth C Breen; Tuff Witarama; Carmen Carrillo; Nina Sadeghi; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; Perry Nicassio; Patricia A Ganz; Julienne E Bower; Steve Cole Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Rebecca A Campo; Kathleen C Light; Kathleen O'Connor; Yoshio Nakamura; David Lipschitz; Paul C LaStayo; Lisa M Pappas; Kenneth M Boucher; Michael R Irwin; Harry R Hill; Thomas B Martins; Neeraj Agarwal; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jo Lynne W Robins; Nancy L McCain; R K Elswick; Jeanne M Walter; D Patricia Gray; Inez Tuck Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Peter M Wayne; M S Lee; J Novakowski; K Osypiuk; J Ligibel; L E Carlson; R Song Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kamila Osypiuk; Karen Kilgore; Jennifer Ligibel; Gloria Vergara-Diaz; Paolo Bonato; Peter M Wayne Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Linda E Carlson; Erin L Zelinski; Michael Speca; Lynda G Balneaves; Jennifer M Jones; Daniel Santa Mina; Peter M Wayne; Tavis S Campbell; Janine Giese-Davis; Peter Faris; Jennifer Zwicker; Kamala Patel; Tara L Beattie; Steve Cole; Kirsti Toivonen; Jill Nation; Philip Peng; Bruce Thong; Raimond Wong; Sunita Vohra Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 2.226