M Cuzzolaro1, G Vetrone, G Marano, P E Garfinkel. 1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Eating Disorders Unit, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy. m.cuzzolaro@flashnet.it
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT), a 71-item self-report questionnaire that consists of two parts: BUT*A which measures weight phobia, body image concerns, avoidance, compulsive self-monitoring, detachment and estrangement feelings towards one's own body (depersonalization); and BUT*B which looks at specific worries about particular body parts or functions. METHODS: We recruited a clinical sample of 531 subjects (491 females) suffering from eating disorders and a general population sample of 3273 subjects (2016 females) with BMI <25 and Eating Attitudes Test-26 scores under the cut-off 20. RESULTS: The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirmed a structural five-factor model for BUT*A and an eight-factor model for BUT*B. Internal consistency was satisfactory. The test-retest correlation coefficients were highly significant. Concurrent validity with other tests (Eating Disorder Inventory, EDI-2; Eating Attitudes Test, EAT-26; Symptom Check List, SCL-90R and Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, SEI) was evaluated. Normative values for BUT scores in non-clinical samples of normal-weight non eating disordered subjects, from adolescence to old age, males and females, were calculated. The differences between males and females were highly significant, above all in the 18-39-age range. As for the comparison between women with eating disorders and controls, the results demonstrated a good predictive validity for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. CONCLUSIONS: The BUT is psychometrically sound. It can be a valuable tool for the screening and the clinical assessment of abnormal body image attitudes and eating disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT), a 71-item self-report questionnaire that consists of two parts: BUT*A which measures weight phobia, body image concerns, avoidance, compulsive self-monitoring, detachment and estrangement feelings towards one's own body (depersonalization); and BUT*B which looks at specific worries about particular body parts or functions. METHODS: We recruited a clinical sample of 531 subjects (491 females) suffering from eating disorders and a general population sample of 3273 subjects (2016 females) with BMI <25 and Eating Attitudes Test-26 scores under the cut-off 20. RESULTS: The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirmed a structural five-factor model for BUT*A and an eight-factor model for BUT*B. Internal consistency was satisfactory. The test-retest correlation coefficients were highly significant. Concurrent validity with other tests (Eating Disorder Inventory, EDI-2; Eating Attitudes Test, EAT-26; Symptom Check List, SCL-90R and Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, SEI) was evaluated. Normative values for BUT scores in non-clinical samples of normal-weight non eating disordered subjects, from adolescence to old age, males and females, were calculated. The differences between males and females were highly significant, above all in the 18-39-age range. As for the comparison between women with eating disorders and controls, the results demonstrated a good predictive validity for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. CONCLUSIONS: The BUT is psychometrically sound. It can be a valuable tool for the screening and the clinical assessment of abnormal body image attitudes and eating disorders.
Authors: L Sideli; A Prestifilippo; B Di Benedetto; R Farrauto; R Grassìa; A Mulè; M V Rumeo; A Di Pasquale; F Conte; D La Barbera Journal: Ann Burns Fire Disasters Date: 2010-12-31
Authors: C Segura-García; M C Papaianni; F Caglioti; L Procopio; C G Nisticò; L Bombardiere; A Ammendolia; P Rizza; P De Fazio; L Capranica Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: L Pingani; S Catellani; F Arnone; E De Bernardis; V Vinci; G Ziosi; G Turrini; M Rigatelli; S Ferrari Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Stefano Valente; Giulia Di Girolamo; Martina Forlani; Anna Biondini; Paolo Scudellari; Diana De Ronchi; Anna Rita Atti Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.652