PURPOSE: It is advantageous to individualize high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) to maintain adequate exposure while minimizing toxicities. Previously, we accomplished this through within-course dose adjustments. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated a strategy to individualize HDMTX based on clearance of each individual's previous course of HDMTX in 485 patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Doses were individualized to achieve a steady-state plasma concentration (Cpss) of 33 or 65 μM (approximately 2.5 or 5 g/m(2)/day) for low- and standard-/high-risk patients, respectively. RESULTS: Individualized doses resulted in 70 and 63 % of courses being within 20 % of the targeted Cpss in the low- and standard-/high-risk arms, respectively, compared to 60 % (p < 0.001) and 61 % (p = 0.43) with conventionally dosed therapy. Only 1.3 % of the individualized courses in the standard-/high-risk arm had a Cpss greater than 50 % above the target compared to 7.3 % (p < 0.001) in conventionally dosed therapy. We observed a low rate (8.5 % of courses) of grade 3-4 toxicities. The odds of gastrointestinal toxicity were related to methotrexate plasma concentrations in both the low (p = 0.021)- and standard-/high-risk groups (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Individualizing HDMTX based on the clearance from the prior course resulted in fewer extreme Cpss values and less delayed excretion compared to conventional dosing.
PURPOSE: It is advantageous to individualize high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) to maintain adequate exposure while minimizing toxicities. Previously, we accomplished this through within-course dose adjustments. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated a strategy to individualize HDMTX based on clearance of each individual's previous course of HDMTX in 485 patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Doses were individualized to achieve a steady-state plasma concentration (Cpss) of 33 or 65 μM (approximately 2.5 or 5 g/m(2)/day) for low- and standard-/high-risk patients, respectively. RESULTS: Individualized doses resulted in 70 and 63 % of courses being within 20 % of the targeted Cpss in the low- and standard-/high-risk arms, respectively, compared to 60 % (p < 0.001) and 61 % (p = 0.43) with conventionally dosed therapy. Only 1.3 % of the individualized courses in the standard-/high-risk arm had a Cpss greater than 50 % above the target compared to 7.3 % (p < 0.001) in conventionally dosed therapy. We observed a low rate (8.5 % of courses) of grade 3-4 toxicities. The odds of gastrointestinal toxicity were related to methotrexate plasma concentrations in both the low (p = 0.021)- and standard-/high-risk groups (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Individualizing HDMTX based on the clearance from the prior course resulted in fewer extreme Cpss values and less delayed excretion compared to conventional dosing.
Authors: Sumit Gupta; Federico A Antillon; Miguel Bonilla; Ligia Fu; Scott C Howard; Raul C Ribeiro; Lillian Sung Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L B Silverman; R D Gelber; V K Dalton; B L Asselin; R D Barr; L A Clavell; C A Hurwitz; A Moghrabi; Y Samson; M A Schorin; S Arkin; L Declerck; H J Cohen; S E Sallan Journal: Blood Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S J Lauer; J J Shuster; D H Mahoney; N Winick; S Toledano; L Munoz; G Kiefer; J D Pullen; C P Steuber; B M Camitta Journal: Leukemia Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Courtney S Watts; Joseph N Sciasci; Jennifer L Pauley; John C Panetta; Deqing Pei; Cheng Cheng; Caroline M Christensen; Torben S Mikkelsen; Ching-Hon Pui; Sima Jeha; Mary V Relling Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Anna Birg Mitchell; Aksana Vasilyeva; Amar Gajjar; Victor M Santana; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Hiroto Inaba; Xueyuan Cao; Alice Q Han; John C Panetta; Kirsten K Ness; Monika L Metzger; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Raul C Ribeiro; John T Sandlund; Sima Jeha; Cheng Cheng; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling; Sue C Kaste Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Deepa Bhojwani; Noah D Sabin; Deqing Pei; Jun J Yang; Raja B Khan; John C Panetta; Kevin R Krull; Hiroto Inaba; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Monika L Metzger; Scott C Howard; Raul C Ribeiro; Cheng Cheng; Wilburn E Reddick; Sima Jeha; John T Sandlund; William E Evans; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John C Panetta; Jessica K Roberts; Jie Huang; Tong Lin; Vinay M Daryani; K Elaine Harstead; Yogesh T Patel; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Olivia Campagne; Deborah A Ward; Alberto Broniscer; Giles Robinson; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 4.335