Literature DB >> 30548417

Determining success rates of the current pharmacokinetically guided dosing approach of topotecan in pediatric oncology patients.

Anna Birg Mitchell1, Aksana Vasilyeva1, Amar Gajjar2, Victor M Santana2, Clinton F Stewart1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent that is active against many pediatric tumors. Although its effect is related to systemic exposure, the interpatient variability in systemic clearance makes it challenging to achieve desired topotecan targets. This study aims to evaluate the success of the pharmacokinetically (PK) guided dosing process, which was used to achieve a target topotecan area under the concentration-time curve (AUC).
METHODS: Patients received an empiric topotecan dosage on the first day; the topotecan lactone AUC was determined, and based upon these values the topotecan dosage was adjusted. The success rates of both the empiric and PK-guided strategies were calculated. Patient-specific covariates were collected to explain variability observed in the empiric and PK-guided results. A simulation study was performed to assess the differences in cumulative topotecan dosage and systemic exposure between a PK-guided and standard dosing approach.
RESULTS: Data were collected from nine clinical trials open from 1996 to 2016 (n = 232 patients). The empiric dosing success rate was 35.5%, while the PK-guided rate was 64.4%. A difference in mean serum creatinine was observed between successful empiric studies and those above the AUC target. Compared to a standard dosing approach, the PK-guided group had a higher average cumulative dosage and systemic exposure.
CONCLUSION: The low empiric dosing success rate indicates that additional studies are needed to refine the initial topotecan dosage. The role of renal function, measured as serum creatinine, remains to be elucidated. However, the PK-guided targeting success rate highlighted the need to account for variable topotecan systemic clearance.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PK-guided dosing; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; topotecan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30548417      PMCID: PMC6386591          DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  15 in total

Review 1.  Topoisomerase-targeting antitumor drugs: mechanisms of cytotoxicity and resistance.

Authors:  L F Liu; P D'Arpa
Journal:  Important Adv Oncol       Date:  1992

2.  Combination of cladribine plus topotecan for recurrent or refractory pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Shengping Yang; Stanley Pounds; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Bassem I Razzouk; Raul C Ribeiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Topoisomerase I interactive drugs in children with cancer.

Authors:  C F Stewart; W C Zamboni; W R Crom; A Gajjar; R L Heideman; W L Furman; W H Meyer; P J Houghton; C B Pratt
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) study of topotecan using a five-day course in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study.

Authors:  D G Tubergen; C F Stewart; C B Pratt; W C Zamboni; N Winick; V M Santana; Z A Dryer; J Kurtzberg; B Bell; H Grier; T J Vietti
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.289

5.  Ocular Salvage and Vision Preservation Using a Topotecan-Based Regimen for Advanced Intraocular Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Rachel C Brennan; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Clinton F Stewart; Mary Ellen Hoehn; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Effective schedules of exposure of medulloblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts to topotecan correlate with in vitro assays.

Authors:  C A Pawlik; P J Houghton; C F Stewart; P J Cheshire; L B Richmond; M K Danks
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  A pilot study of protracted topotecan dosing using a pharmacokinetically guided dosing approach in children with solid tumors.

Authors:  Victor M Santana; William C Zamboni; Mark N Kirstein; Ming Tan; Tiebin Liu; Amar Gajjar; Peter J Houghton; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Application of a highly specific and sensitive fluorescent HPLC method for topotecan lactone in whole blood.

Authors:  K Elaine Hubbard; Paula Schaiquevich; Feng Bai; Charles H Fraga; Laura Miller; John C Panetta; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 9.  The importance of pharmacokinetic limited sampling models for childhood cancer drug development.

Authors:  J Carl Panetta; Lisa C Iacono; Peter C Adamson; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Topotecan is active against Wilms' tumor: results of a multi-institutional phase II study.

Authors:  Monika L Metzger; Clinton F Stewart; Burgess B Freeman; Catherine A Billups; Fredric A Hoffer; Jianrong Wu; Max J Coppes; Ronald Grant; Murali Chintagumpala; Elizabeth A Mullen; Carlos Alvarado; Najat C Daw; Jeffrey S Dome
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Convection Enhanced Delivery of Topotecan for Gliomas: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Pavan S Upadhyayula; Eleonora F Spinazzi; Michael G Argenziano; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.321

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.