AIMS: No population pharmacokinetic studies of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) have been conducted in infants with brain tumours, which are a vulnerable population. The aim of this study was to evaluate HDMTX disposition in these children to provide a rational basis for MTX dosing. METHODS: Patients received 4 monthly courses of HDMTX (5 g/m2 or 2.5 g/m2 for infants aged ≤31 days) as a 24-h infusion. Serial samples were analysed for MTX by an enzyme immunoassay method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed effects population modelling. Demographics, concomitant medications and genetic polymorphisms were considered as pharmacokinetic covariates while MTX exposure and patient age were considered as covariates for Grade 3 and 4 toxicities. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetics of HDMTX were estimated in 178 patients (age range 0.02-4.7 years) in 648 courses. The population clearance and volume were 90 mL/min/m2 and 14.4 L/m2 , respectively. Significant covariates on body surface area adjusted MTX clearance included estimated glomerular filtration rate and co-treatment with dexamethasone or vancomycin. No significant association was observed between MTX toxicity and MTX exposure, patient age, leucovorin dosage or duration. MTX clearance in infants ≤31 days at enrolment was 44% lower than in older infants, but their incidence of toxicity was not higher since they also received a lower MTX dosage. CONCLUSIONS: By aggressively following institutional clinical guidelines, HDMTX-related toxicities were low, and using covariates from the population pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of a rational dosage for this patient population for future clinical trials.
AIMS: No population pharmacokinetic studies of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) have been conducted in infants with brain tumours, which are a vulnerable population. The aim of this study was to evaluate HDMTX disposition in these children to provide a rational basis for MTX dosing. METHODS:Patients received 4 monthly courses of HDMTX (5 g/m2 or 2.5 g/m2 for infants aged ≤31 days) as a 24-h infusion. Serial samples were analysed for MTX by an enzyme immunoassay method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed effects population modelling. Demographics, concomitant medications and genetic polymorphisms were considered as pharmacokinetic covariates while MTX exposure and patient age were considered as covariates for Grade 3 and 4 toxicities. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetics of HDMTX were estimated in 178 patients (age range 0.02-4.7 years) in 648 courses. The population clearance and volume were 90 mL/min/m2 and 14.4 L/m2 , respectively. Significant covariates on body surface area adjusted MTX clearance included estimated glomerular filtration rate and co-treatment with dexamethasone or vancomycin. No significant association was observed between MTXtoxicity and MTX exposure, patient age, leucovorin dosage or duration. MTX clearance in infants ≤31 days at enrolment was 44% lower than in older infants, but their incidence of toxicity was not higher since they also received a lower MTX dosage. CONCLUSIONS: By aggressively following institutional clinical guidelines, HDMTX-related toxicities were low, and using covariates from the population pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of a rational dosage for this patient population for future clinical trials.
Authors: André O von Bueren; Katja von Hoff; Torsten Pietsch; Nicolas U Gerber; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Frank Deinlein; Isabella Zwiener; Andreas Faldum; Gudrun Fleischhack; Martin Benesch; Juergen Krauss; Joachim Kuehl; Rolf D Kortmann; Stefan Rutkowski Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ryan J Beechinor; Patrick A Thompson; Michael F Hwang; Ryan C Vargo; Lisa R Bomgaars; Jacqueline G Gerhart; ZoAnn E Dreyer; Daniel Gonzalez Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Catherine Patte; Anne Auperin; Mary Gerrard; Jean Michon; Ross Pinkerton; Richard Sposto; Claire Weston; Martine Raphael; Sherrie L Perkins; Keith McCarthy; Mitchell S Cairo Journal: Blood Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M Joerger; A D R Huitema; H J G D van den Bongard; P Baas; J H Schornagel; J H M Schellens; J H Beijnen Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Stefan Rutkowski; Udo Bode; Frank Deinlein; Holger Ottensmeier; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Niels Soerensen; Norbert Graf; Angela Emser; Torsten Pietsch; Johannes E A Wolff; Rolf D Kortmann; Joachim Kuehl Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory L Kearns; Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Sarah W Alander; Douglas L Blowey; J Steven Leeder; Ralph E Kauffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P K Duffner; M E Cohen; S W Anderson; M L Voorhess; M H MacGillivray; A Panahon; M L Brecher Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1983-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: John C Panetta; Jessica K Roberts; Jie Huang; Tong Lin; Vinay M Daryani; K Elaine Harstead; Yogesh T Patel; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Olivia Campagne; Deborah A Ward; Alberto Broniscer; Giles Robinson; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: A Laura Nijstad; Shelby Barnett; Arief Lalmohamed; Inez M Bérénos; Elizabeth Parke; Vickyanne Carruthers; Deborah A Tweddle; Jordon Kong; C Michel Zwaan; Alwin D R Huitema; Gareth J Veal Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 9.162