Literature DB >> 23759725

Two colonisation stages generate two different patterns of genetic diversity within native and invasive ranges of Ulex europaeus.

B Hornoy1, A Atlan, V Roussel, Y M Buckley, M Tarayre.   

Abstract

Genetic diversity and the way a species is introduced influence the capacity of populations of invasive species to persist in, and adapt to, their new environment. The diversity of introduced populations affects their evolutionary potential, which is particularly important for species that have invaded a wide range of habitats and climates, such as European gorse, Ulex europaeus. This species originated in the Iberian peninsula and colonised Europe in the Neolithic; over the course of the past two centuries it was introduced to, and has become invasive in, other continents. We characterised neutral genetic diversity and its structure in the native range and in invaded regions. By coupling these results with historical data, we have identified the way in which gorse populations were introduced and the consequences of introduction history on genetic diversity. Our study is based on the genotyping of individuals from 18 populations at six microsatellite loci. As U. europaeus is an allohexaploid species, we used recently developed tools that take into account genotypic ambiguity. Our results show that genetic diversity in gorse is very high and mainly contained within populations. We confirm that colonisation occurred in two stages. During the first stage, gorse spread out naturally from Spain towards northern Europe, losing some genetic diversity. During the second stage, gorse was introduced by humans into different regions of the world, from northern Europe. These introductions resulted in the loss of rare alleles but did not significantly reduce genetic diversity and thus the evolutionary potential of this invasive species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23759725      PMCID: PMC3806022          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  34 in total

1.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?

Authors:  N C Ellstrand; K A Schierenbeck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants.

Authors:  Hilde Nybom
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions.

Authors:  Mariska te Beest; Johannes J Le Roux; David M Richardson; Anne K Brysting; Jan Suda; Magdalena Kubesová; Petr Pysek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Population genetic consequences of geographic disjunction: a prairie plant isolated on Great Lakes alvars.

Authors:  J A Hamilton; C G Eckert
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection.

Authors:  Stephen R Keller; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Genetic variation and relationships among Ulex (Fabaceae) species in southern Spain and northern Morocco assessed by chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers.

Authors:  Paloma Cubas; Cristina Pardo; Hikmat Tahiri
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  Evolutionary origins of invasive populations.

Authors:  Carol Eunmi Lee; Gregory William Gelembiuk
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multiple and mass introductions from limited origins: genetic diversity and structure of Solidago altissima in the native and invaded range.

Authors:  Yuzu Sakata; Joanne Itami; Yuji Isagi; Takayuki Ohgushi
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Quantifying genetic diversity: the starting point for population genetic studies using molecular markers.

Authors:  María Eugenia Barrandeguy; María Victoria García
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Genetic variation facilitates seedling establishment but not population growth rate of a perennial invader.

Authors:  Shou-Li Li; Anti Vasemägi; Satu Ramula
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Understanding invasion history and predicting invasive niches using genetic sequencing technology in Australia: case studies from Cucurbitaceae and Boraginaceae.

Authors:  Razia S Shaik; Xiaocheng Zhu; David R Clements; Leslie A Weston
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 5.  A mini-review on the impact of common gorse in its introduced ranges.

Authors:  Hansani S S Daluwatta Galappaththi; W A Priyanka P de Silva; Andrea Clavijo Mccormick
Journal:  Trop Ecol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 1.333

6.  The impact of a native hemiparasite on a major invasive shrub is affected by host size at time of infection.

Authors:  Robert M Cirocco; José M Facelli; Jennifer R Watling
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 6.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.