Literature DB >> 26420202

Genetic variation facilitates seedling establishment but not population growth rate of a perennial invader.

Shou-Li Li1, Anti Vasemägi2, Satu Ramula3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assessing the demographic consequences of genetic variation is fundamental to invasion biology. However, genetic and demographic approaches are rarely combined to explore the effects of genetic variation on invasive populations in natural environments. This study combined population genetics, demographic data and a greenhouse experiment to investigate the consequences of genetic variation for the population fitness of the perennial, invasive herb Lupinus polyphyllus.
METHODS: Genetic and demographic data were collected from 37 L. polyphyllus populations representing different latitudes in Finland, and genetic variation was characterized based on 13 microsatellite loci. Associations between genetic variation and population size, population density, latitude and habitat were investigated. Genetic variation was then explored in relation to four fitness components (establishment, survival, growth, fecundity) measured at the population level, and the long-term population growth rate (λ). For a subset of populations genetic variation was also examined in relation to the temporal variability of λ. A further assessment was made of the role of natural selection in the observed variation of certain fitness components among populations under greenhouse conditions. KEY
RESULTS: It was found that genetic variation correlated positively with population size, particularly at higher latitudes, and differed among habitat types. Average seedling establishment per population increased with genetic variation in the field, but not under greenhouse conditions. Quantitative genetic divergence (Q(ST)) based on seedling establishment in the greenhouse was smaller than allelic genetic divergence (F'(ST)), indicating that unifying selection has a prominent role in this fitness component. Genetic variation was not associated with average survival, growth or fecundity measured at the population level, λ or its variability.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that although genetic variation may facilitate plant invasions by increasing seedling establishment, it may not necessarily affect the long-term population growth rate. Therefore, established invasions may be able to grow equally well regardless of their genetic diversity.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demography; Fabaceae.; Lupinus polyphyllus; fitness; genetic diversity; invasion ecology; life history traits; population dynamics; population growth rate; vital rates

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26420202      PMCID: PMC4701146          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  37 in total

1.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly.

Authors:  David Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions.

Authors:  Joe Roman; John A Darling
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Brian D Inouye; Marc T J Johnson; Nora Underwood; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Permanent genetic resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 February 2013-31 March 2013.

Authors:  M C Arias; Christiane Atteke; S C Augusto; J Bailey; Pilar Bazaga; Luciano B Beheregaray; Laure Benoit; Rumsaïs Blatrix; Céline Born; R M Brito; Hai-kui Chen; Sara Covarrubias; Clara de Vega; Champlain Djiéto-Lordon; Marie-Pierre Dubois; F O Francisco; Cristina García; P H P Gonçalves; Clementina González; Carla Gutiérrez-Rodríguez; Michael P Hammer; Carlos M Herrera; H Itoh; S Kamimura; H Karaoglu; S Kojima; Shou-Li Li; Hannah J Ling; Pável F Matos-Maraví; Doyle McKey; Judicaël Mezui-M'Eko; Juan Francisco Ornelas; R F Park; María I Pozo; Satu Ramula; Cristina Rigueiro; Jonathan Sandoval-Castillo; L R Santiago; Miyuki M Seino; Chang-Bing Song; H Takeshima; Anti Vasemägi; C R Wellings; Ji Yan; Du Yu-Zhou; Chang-Rong Zhang; Tian-Yun Zhang
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 7.  The devil is in the details: genetic variation in introduced populations and its contributions to invasion.

Authors:  Katrina M Dlugosch; Samantha R Anderson; Joseph Braasch; F Alice Cang; Heather D Gillette
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Q(ST) < F(ST) As a signature of canalization.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Lamy; Christophe Plomion; Antoine Kremer; Sylvain Delzon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 9.  Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Tuomas Leinonen; R J Scott McCairns; Robert B O'Hara; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Granivory of invasive, naturalized, and native plants in communities differentially susceptible to invasion.

Authors:  B M Connolly; D E Pearson; R N Mack
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  2 in total

1.  Global gene flow releases invasive plants from environmental constraints on genetic diversity.

Authors:  Annabel L Smith; Trevor R Hodkinson; Jesus Villellas; Jane A Catford; Anna Mária Csergő; Simone P Blomberg; Elizabeth E Crone; Johan Ehrlén; Maria B Garcia; Anna-Liisa Laine; Deborah A Roach; Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Glenda M Wardle; Dylan Z Childs; Bret D Elderd; Alain Finn; Sergi Munné-Bosch; Maude E A Baudraz; Judit Bódis; Francis Q Brearley; Anna Bucharova; Christina M Caruso; Richard P Duncan; John M Dwyer; Ben Gooden; Ronny Groenteman; Liv Norunn Hamre; Aveliina Helm; Ruth Kelly; Lauri Laanisto; Michele Lonati; Joslin L Moore; Melanie Morales; Siri Lie Olsen; Meelis Pärtel; William K Petry; Satu Ramula; Pil U Rasmussen; Simone Ravetto Enri; Anna Roeder; Christiane Roscher; Marjo Saastamoinen; Ayco J M Tack; Joachim Paul Töpper; Gregory E Vose; Elizabeth M Wandrag; Astrid Wingler; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptive differentiation of Festuca rubra along a climate gradient revealed by molecular markers and quantitative traits.

Authors:  Bojana Stojanova; Mária Šurinová; Jaroslav Klápště; Veronika Koláříková; Věroslava Hadincová; Zuzana Münzbergová
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.