INTRODUCTION: Occupational exposure to endotoxin, found in Gram-negative bacteria in organic material, has been associated predominantly with a reduced risk of lung cancer among workers. An inverse exposure-response gradient among women textile workers in Shanghai, China, has been reported previously. In this case-cohort study, we investigated the influence of left truncation, which can itself induce a downward trend, on the observed association. METHODS: Subjects were enrolled between 1989 and 1991 and followed until 1998. The data were left-truncated as all subjects were hired before baseline. An analysis was performed with 3038 subcohort members and 602 cases of incident lung cancer. To evaluate left truncation, we compared lung cancer rates in those hired longer ago with those hired more recently among unexposed subjects. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to estimate incident rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among those who were never exposed to workplace endotoxin, we compared lung cancer rates in those hired >35 years before enrolment with workers hired ≤35 years before enrolment and observed a reduced risk in the former group, IRR=0.74, 95% CI (0.51 to 1.07). After accounting for this downward bias from left truncation, the reduced risk associated with endotoxin remained among those hired ≤50 years before enrolment. In contrast, there was suggestion of an increased risk of lung cancer among those hired >50 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: After examination of left truncation bias, an inverse dose-response between endotoxin and lung cancer remained for all subjects except those hired longest ago.
INTRODUCTION: Occupational exposure to endotoxin, found in Gram-negative bacteria in organic material, has been associated predominantly with a reduced risk of lung cancer among workers. An inverse exposure-response gradient among women textile workers in Shanghai, China, has been reported previously. In this case-cohort study, we investigated the influence of left truncation, which can itself induce a downward trend, on the observed association. METHODS: Subjects were enrolled between 1989 and 1991 and followed until 1998. The data were left-truncated as all subjects were hired before baseline. An analysis was performed with 3038 subcohort members and 602 cases of incident lung cancer. To evaluate left truncation, we compared lung cancer rates in those hired longer ago with those hired more recently among unexposed subjects. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to estimate incident rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among those who were never exposed to workplace endotoxin, we compared lung cancer rates in those hired >35 years before enrolment with workers hired ≤35 years before enrolment and observed a reduced risk in the former group, IRR=0.74, 95% CI (0.51 to 1.07). After accounting for this downward bias from left truncation, the reduced risk associated with endotoxin remained among those hired ≤50 years before enrolment. In contrast, there was suggestion of an increased risk of lung cancer among those hired >50 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: After examination of left truncation bias, an inverse dose-response between endotoxin and lung cancer remained for all subjects except those hired longest ago.
Authors: Susan Peters; Hans Kromhout; Ann C Olsson; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Irene Brüske; Dario Consonni; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Jack Siemiatycki; Lorenzo Richiardi; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Simonato; Per Gustavsson; Nils Plato; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Wolfgang Ahrens; Hermann Pohlabeln; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; David Zaridze; Adrian Cassidy; Jolanta Lissowska; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Peter Rudnai; Eleonora Fabianova; Francesco Forastiere; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Isabelle Stücker; Rodica Stanescu Dumitru; Simone Benhamou; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Benjamin Kendzia; Beate Pesch; Kurt Straif; Thomas Brüning; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Thorax Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Virissa Lenters; Ioannis Basinas; Laura Beane-Freeman; Paolo Boffetta; Harvey Checkoway; David Coggon; Lützen Portengen; Malcolm Sim; Inge M Wouters; Dick Heederik; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-12-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Peggy S Lai; Jing-Qing Hang; Feng-Ying Zhang; Xinyi Lin; Bu-Yong Zheng; Hei-Lian Dai; Li Su; Tianxi Cai; David C Christiani Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: H Checkoway; J I Lundin; S Costello; R Ray; W Li; E A Eisen; G Astrakianakis; N Seixas; K Applebaum; D L Gao; D B Thomas Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 7.640