BACKGROUND: Organic dust is a complex mixture of particulate matter from microbial, plant or animal origin. Occupations with exposure to animal products have been associated with an increased lung cancer risk, while exposure to microbial components (eg, endotoxin) has been associated with a decreased risk. To date there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of the possible association between occupational organic dust exposure (and its specific constituents) and lung cancer risk in the general population. METHODS: The SYNERGY project has pooled information on lifetime working and smoking from 13 300 lung cancer cases and 16 273 controls from 11 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. A newly developed general population job-exposure matrix (assigning no, low or high exposure to organic dust, endotoxin, and contact with animals or fresh animal products) was applied to determine level of exposure. ORs for lung cancer were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study, cigarette pack-years, time since quitting smoking, and ever employment in occupations with established lung cancer risk. RESULTS: Occupational organic dust exposure was associated with increased lung cancer risk. The second to the fourth quartile of cumulative exposure showed significant risk estimates ranging from 1.12 to 1.24 in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.001). This association remained in the highest quartile after restricting analyses to subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. No association was observed between lung cancer and exposure to endotoxin or contact with animals or animal products. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure to organic dust was associated with increased lung cancer risk in this large pooled case-control study.
BACKGROUND: Organic dust is a complex mixture of particulate matter from microbial, plant or animal origin. Occupations with exposure to animal products have been associated with an increased lung cancer risk, while exposure to microbial components (eg, endotoxin) has been associated with a decreased risk. To date there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of the possible association between occupational organic dust exposure (and its specific constituents) and lung cancer risk in the general population. METHODS: The SYNERGY project has pooled information on lifetime working and smoking from 13 300 lung cancer cases and 16 273 controls from 11 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. A newly developed general population job-exposure matrix (assigning no, low or high exposure to organic dust, endotoxin, and contact with animals or fresh animal products) was applied to determine level of exposure. ORs for lung cancer were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study, cigarette pack-years, time since quitting smoking, and ever employment in occupations with established lung cancer risk. RESULTS: Occupational organic dust exposure was associated with increased lung cancer risk. The second to the fourth quartile of cumulative exposure showed significant risk estimates ranging from 1.12 to 1.24 in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.001). This association remained in the highest quartile after restricting analyses to subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. No association was observed between lung cancer and exposure to endotoxin or contact with animals or animal products. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure to organic dust was associated with increased lung cancer risk in this large pooled case-control study.
Authors: Katie M Applebaum; Roberta M Ray; George Astrakianakis; Dao Li Gao; David B Thomas; David C Christiani; Michael P LaValley; Wenjin Li; Harvey Checkoway; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Dirk Taeger; Beate Pesch; Benjamin Kendzia; Thomas Behrens; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Dirk Dahmann; Jack Siemiatycki; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Susan Peters; Ann Olsson; Irene Brüske; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Isabelle Stücker; Florence Guida; Adonina Tardón; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Richiardi; Hermann Pohlabeln; Wolfgang Ahrens; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Anush Mukeriya; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Jolanta Lissowska; Per Gustavsson; John Field; Michael W Marcus; Eleonora Fabianova; Andrea 't Mannetje; Neil Pearce; Peter Rudnai; Vladimir Bencko; Vladimir Janout; Rodica Stanescu Dumitru; Lenka Foretova; Francesco Forastiere; John McLaughlin; Paul Demers Paul Demers; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Joachim Schüz; Kurt Straif; Thomas Brüning Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: S C Fang; A J Mehta; J Q Hang; E A Eisen; H L Dai; H X Zhang; L Su; D C Christiani Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Ann C Olsson; Yiwen Xu; Joachim Schüz; Jelle Vlaanderen; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Susan Peters; Isabelle Stücker; Florence Guida; Irene Brüske; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Dario Consonni; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Lap Ah Tse; Ignatius Tak-sun Yu; Jack Siemiatycki; Lesley Richardson; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Richiardi; Lorenzo Simonato; Per Gustavsson; Nils Plato; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Wolfgang Ahrens; Hermann Pohlabeln; Adonina Tardón; David Zaridze; Michael W Marcus; Andrea 't Mannetje; Neil Pearce; John McLaughlin; Paul Demers; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Jolanta Lissowska; Peter Rudnai; Eleonora Fabianova; Rodica Stanescu Dumitru; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Paolo Boffetta; Cristina Fortes; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Benjamin Kendzia; Thomas Behrens; Beate Pesch; Thomas Brüning; Kurt Straif Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jonathan N Hofmann; Meredith S Shiels; Melissa C Friesen; Troy J Kemp; Anil K Chaturvedi; Charles F Lynch; Christine G Parks; Ligia A Pinto; Allan Hildesheim; Michael C R Alavanja; Laura E Beane Freeman Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 4.402