OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between exposure to endotoxins and lung cancer risk by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of workers in the cotton textile and agricultural industries; industries known for high exposure levels of endotoxins. METHODS: Risk estimates were extracted from studies published before 2009 that met predefined quality criteria, including 8 cohort, 1 case-cohort, and 2 case-control studies of cotton textile industry workers, and 15 cohort and 2 case-control studies of agricultural workers. Summary risk estimates were calculated using random effects meta-analyses. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses. RESULTS: The summary risk of lung cancer was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.57-0.90) for textile workers and 0.62 (0.52-0.75) for agricultural workers. The relative risk of lung cancer was below 1.0 for most subgroups defined according to sex, study design, outcome, smoking adjustment, and geographic area. Two studies provided quantitative estimates of endotoxin exposure and both studies tended to support a dose-dependent protective effect of endotoxins on lung cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Despite several limitations, this meta-analysis based on high-quality studies adds weight to the hypothesis that occupational exposure to endotoxin in cotton textile production and agriculture is protective against lung cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between exposure to endotoxins and lung cancer risk by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of workers in the cotton textile and agricultural industries; industries known for high exposure levels of endotoxins. METHODS: Risk estimates were extracted from studies published before 2009 that met predefined quality criteria, including 8 cohort, 1 case-cohort, and 2 case-control studies of cotton textile industry workers, and 15 cohort and 2 case-control studies of agricultural workers. Summary risk estimates were calculated using random effects meta-analyses. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses. RESULTS: The summary risk of lung cancer was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.57-0.90) for textile workers and 0.62 (0.52-0.75) for agricultural workers. The relative risk of lung cancer was below 1.0 for most subgroups defined according to sex, study design, outcome, smoking adjustment, and geographic area. Two studies provided quantitative estimates of endotoxin exposure and both studies tended to support a dose-dependent protective effect of endotoxins on lung cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Despite several limitations, this meta-analysis based on high-quality studies adds weight to the hypothesis that occupational exposure to endotoxin in cotton textile production and agriculture is protective against lung cancer.
Authors: John H Lange; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Ugo Fedeli; Emanuela Fadda; Ragnar Rylander; Eunil Lee Journal: Ann Agric Environ Med Date: 2003 Impact factor: 1.447
Authors: Parveen Bhatti; Laura Newcomer; Lynn Onstad; Kay Teschke; Janice Camp; Michael Morgan; Thomas L Vaughan Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Catherine C Lerro; Stella Koutros; Gabriella Andreotti; Dale P Sandler; Charles F Lynch; Lydia M Louis; Aaron Blair; Christine G Parks; Srishti Shrestha; Jay H Lubin; Paul S Albert; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Katie M Applebaum; Roberta M Ray; George Astrakianakis; Dao Li Gao; David B Thomas; David C Christiani; Michael P LaValley; Wenjin Li; Harvey Checkoway; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Ilir Agalliu; Sadie Costello; Katie M Applebaum; Roberta M Ray; George Astrakianakis; Dao Li Gao; David B Thomas; Harvey Checkoway; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Peggy S Lai; Jing-Qing Hang; Feng-Ying Zhang; Xinyi Lin; Bu-Yong Zheng; Hei-Lian Dai; Li Su; Tianxi Cai; David C Christiani Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.402