Marlene E Gubata1, Elizabeth R Packnett, Caitlin D Blandford, Amanda L Piccirillo, David W Niebuhr, David N Cowan. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland (Drs Gubata, Niebuhr, and Cowan and Mss Packnett, Blandford, and Piccirillo); and Allied Technology Group, Inc, Rockville, Maryland (Mss Packnett, Blandford, and Piccirillo and Dr Cowan).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been recognized as a major public health issue for several decades. Despite technological advancements in protective equipment and medical care available during recent military conflicts, TBI is the most common neurological condition among Soldiers and Marines evaluated for discharge from service. This study describes the demographic, service-related, and disability characteristics of Soldiers and Marines referred for combat-related TBI disability evaluation. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of Soldiers and Marines evaluated for combat-related disability between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2010 was performed. Traumatic brain injury cases were identified using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities code for TBI and compared with other combat-related disabilities. RESULTS: Combat-related TBI disability rates have significantly increased in both the Army and the Marine Corps since 2005. Significantly more unfitting conditions are present on average in combat-related TBI cases than in other combat-related disability cases. Combat-related TBI disability cases are more likely to be medically retired than other types of combat-related disability. CONCLUSIONS: Because veterans with combat-related TBI disabilities are likely to require chronic care for TBI-associated medical conditions, disability evaluation policy and programs must ensure that combat-related TBI disabilities are accurately identified and compensated, and the potential long-term care needs are addressed.
BACKGROUND:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been recognized as a major public health issue for several decades. Despite technological advancements in protective equipment and medical care available during recent military conflicts, TBI is the most common neurological condition among Soldiers and Marines evaluated for discharge from service. This study describes the demographic, service-related, and disability characteristics of Soldiers and Marines referred for combat-related TBI disability evaluation. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of Soldiers and Marines evaluated for combat-related disability between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2010 was performed. Traumatic brain injury cases were identified using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities code for TBI and compared with other combat-related disabilities. RESULTS: Combat-related TBI disability rates have significantly increased in both the Army and the Marine Corps since 2005. Significantly more unfitting conditions are present on average in combat-related TBI cases than in other combat-related disability cases. Combat-related TBI disability cases are more likely to be medically retired than other types of combat-related disability. CONCLUSIONS: Because veterans with combat-related TBI disabilities are likely to require chronic care for TBI-associated medical conditions, disability evaluation policy and programs must ensure that combat-related TBI disabilities are accurately identified and compensated, and the potential long-term care needs are addressed.
Authors: J P Hayes; A Reagan; M W Logue; S M Hayes; N Sadeh; D R Miller; M Verfaellie; E J Wolf; R E McGlinchey; W P Milberg; A Stone; S A Schichman; M W Miller Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Christian D Cerecedo-López; Jennifer H Kim-Lee; Diana Hernandez; Sandra A Acosta; Cesar V Borlongan Journal: Med Hypotheses Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 1.538
Authors: Yll Agimi; Lemma Ebssa Regasa; Brian Ivins; Saafan Malik; Katherine Helmick; Donald Marion Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga; Dezon Finch; Jill Massengale; Tracy Kretzmer; Stephen L Luther; James A McCart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Todd E White; Monique C Surles-Zeigler; Gregory D Ford; Alicia S Gates; Benem Davids; Timothy Distel; Michelle C LaPlaca; Byron D Ford Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Georgina Perez Garcia; Gissel M Perez; Rita De Gasperi; Miguel A Gama Sosa; Alena Otero-Pagan; Dylan Pryor; Rania Abutarboush; Usmah Kawoos; Patrick R Hof; David G Cook; Sam Gandy; Stephen T Ahlers; Gregory A Elder Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 4.869
Authors: Georgina Perez-Garcia; Rita De Gasperi; Miguel A Gama Sosa; Gissel M Perez; Alena Otero-Pagan; Anna Tschiffely; Richard M McCarron; Stephen T Ahlers; Gregory A Elder; Sam Gandy Journal: eNeuro Date: 2018-01-30
Authors: Karolina Minta; Gunnar Brinkmalm; Faiez Al Nimer; Eric P Thelin; Fredrik Piehl; Mats Tullberg; Anna Jeppsson; Erik Portelius; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Ulf Andreasson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 4.379