Literature DB >> 23754481

[Postoperative complaints : gender differences in expectations, prevalence and appraisal].

M Hüppe1, A Kemter, C Schmidtke, K-F Klotz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women report more severe postoperative complaints than men (e.g. nausea and pain) and expectations of complaints prior to surgery influence the postoperative complaints. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore if gender differences in complaint expectation can account for differences in postoperative complaints. A further objective was to investigate the effective load of complaints and to look for gender differences.
METHODS: In total 281 patients (128 men and 153 women) were included in the study and all patients underwent elective general surgery. Patients were asked for symptom expectations and symptom experiences prior to surgery. After surgery they answered the Anesthesiological Questionnaire (ANP) a validated self-rating method for the assessment of postoperative symptoms and complaints. The symptoms referred to in the questionnaire included sensation of cold, sensation of heat, nausea and vomiting, tickly throat, croakiness, dry mouth and thirst, difficulty in breathing, sore throat, pain in the area of surgery, pain in the area of infusion, muscle pain, back pain, headache, difficulties in urination, difficulty in awakening and feeling of somatic discomfort. In addition patients rated the affective load of the postoperative complaints.
RESULTS: In previous surgery women reported experiencing more postoperative somatic complaints than men. Sex-related differences were significant (p < 0.05) for sensation of cold, nausea and vomiting, tickly throat, croakiness, sore throat, pain and the feeling of somatic discomfort. Likewise, women expected more intensive postoperative complaints following the forthcoming operation. After surgery women reported significantly more severe complaints in negative symptoms of the ANP (e.g. nausea and vomiting, pain and somatic discomfort). Effect sizes of sex-related differences varied according to the symptom (e.g. for pain effect strength d = 0.50, for nausea d = 0.60 and for thirst d = 0.13). Effect sizes decreased when the effect of expectation was statistically controlled. Logistic regression revealed that expectation was an independent predictor for the sensation of severe nausea (odds ratio OR 4.3] and intensive postoperative pain (OR 2.6). Regardless of gender, postoperative pain, nausea and dry mouth/thirst were symptoms with the highest affective load.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative expectations increase gender differences in somatic complaints following surgery. Anesthesiological education of patients should influence dysfunctional expectations. Postoperative pain, nausea and thirst should be the main targets of interventions to improve patient complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754481     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-013-2182-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  34 in total

1.  Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Antonella Pollo; Giuliano Maggi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Response expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevance.

Authors:  Antonella Pollo; Martina Amanzio; Anna Arslanian; Caterina Casadio; Giuliano Maggi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Presurgery psychological factors predict pain, nausea, and fatigue one week after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Guy H Montgomery; Julie B Schnur; Joel Erblich; Michael A Diefenbach; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Patients' direct experiences as central elements of placebo analgesia.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Kathrine Næsted Nørskov; Gitte Laue Petersen; Donald D Price
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  [Patient-oriented anesthesia] .

Authors:  M Dinkel; T Schmidt; B Landsleitner; M Messner; K Börchers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Descriptive data analysis: a concept between confirmatory and exploratory data analysis.

Authors:  K Abt
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Multifactorial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement.

Authors:  Peter H Pan; Robert Coghill; Timothy T Houle; Melvin H Seid; W Michael Lindel; R Lamar Parker; Scott A Washburn; Lynne Harris; James C Eisenach
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients.

Authors:  A Macario; M Weinger; S Carney; A Kim
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  [Perioperative monitoring of the course of anesthesia, the postanesthesia visit and inquiry of patient satisfaction. A prospective study of parameters in process and outcome quality in anesthesia].

Authors:  U Bothner; B Schwilk; P Steffen; L H Eberhart; U Becker; M Georgieff
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 0.698

Review 10.  Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Leonardo Lopiano; Michele Lanotte; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 44.182

View more
  3 in total

1.  Recovery and prediction of postoperative muscle power - is it still a problem?

Authors:  Martin Zoremba; Dennis Kornmann; Benjamin Vojnar; Rene Burchard; Thomas Wiesmann; Hinnerk Wulf; Thomas Kratz
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Attila Ovari; Ilona Bicker; Susann Machmueller; Tobias Schuldt; Martin Sauer; Stefan Soltesz; Gabriele Noeldge-Schomburg; Robert Mlynski; Thomas Mencke
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment.

Authors:  Johannes A C Laferton; Tobias Kube; Stefan Salzmann; Charlotte J Auer; Meike C Shedden-Mora
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.