BACKGROUND: The study aimed to determine predictive factors for postcesarean pain and analgesia using an assessment of pain threshold and suprathreshold thermal stimuli as well as degree of somatization and anxiety. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under subarachnoid anesthesia were enrolled. Preoperative thermal pain threshold, intensity, and unpleasantness to heat stimuli applied to arm and lower back, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, and patient expectation for postoperative pain and need for analgesia were assessed. After surgery, overall, resting, and movement pain and analgesic consumption were recorded. Prediction of pain and analgesic use outcomes was made by principal component factor analysis, followed by stepwise linear regression. RESULTS: Resting pain was predicted by two factors, thermal pain and unpleasantness and patient expectation (r2 = 0.26, P < 0.01), evoked pain by thermal pain threshold in the back (r2= 0.20, P < 0.009), composite pain by thermal pain and unpleasantness and preoperative blood pressure (r2 = 0.28, P < 0.008), intraoperative analgesic need by preexisting pain (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.006), recovery room analgesia by thermal pain threshold and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.27, P < 0.01), and total analgesic need by State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.01). These models predicted the upper twentieth percentile of composite pain scores and analgesic requirement with sensitivity of 0.71 to 0.80 and specificity of 0.76 to 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest a meaningful combination of preoperative patient responses from physical and psychological tests yields a valid multifactorial predictive model for postoperative pain and analgesic requirement with significant improvements over individual predictive variables.
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to determine predictive factors for postcesarean pain and analgesia using an assessment of pain threshold and suprathreshold thermal stimuli as well as degree of somatization and anxiety. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under subarachnoid anesthesia were enrolled. Preoperative thermal pain threshold, intensity, and unpleasantness to heat stimuli applied to arm and lower back, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, and patient expectation for postoperative pain and need for analgesia were assessed. After surgery, overall, resting, and movement pain and analgesic consumption were recorded. Prediction of pain and analgesic use outcomes was made by principal component factor analysis, followed by stepwise linear regression. RESULTS: Resting pain was predicted by two factors, thermal pain and unpleasantness and patient expectation (r2 = 0.26, P < 0.01), evoked pain by thermal pain threshold in the back (r2= 0.20, P < 0.009), composite pain by thermal pain and unpleasantness and preoperative blood pressure (r2 = 0.28, P < 0.008), intraoperative analgesic need by preexisting pain (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.006), recovery room analgesia by thermal pain threshold and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.27, P < 0.01), and total analgesic need by State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.01). These models predicted the upper twentieth percentile of composite pain scores and analgesic requirement with sensitivity of 0.71 to 0.80 and specificity of 0.76 to 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest a meaningful combination of preoperative patient responses from physical and psychological tests yields a valid multifactorial predictive model for postoperative pain and analgesic requirement with significant improvements over individual predictive variables.
Authors: Nurten Seringec Akkececi; Gozen Oksuz; Aykut Urfalioğlu; Ramazan Gunesacar; Murat Bakacak; Mahmut Arslan; Bekir Mehmet Kelleci Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Heberto Suarez-Roca; Rebecca Y Klinger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Ru-Rong Ji; Martin I Sigurdsson; Nathan Waldron; Joseph P Mathew; William Maixner Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Steven D Passik; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Erik Schuster; Daria Orlowska; Christopher R France Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Christopher R Abrecht; Marise Cornelius; Albert Wu; Robert N Jamison; David Janfaza; Richard D Urman; Claudia Campbell; Michael Smith; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; Robert R Edwards; Kristin L Schreiber Journal: Pain Med Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Stephen Bruehl; A Vania Apkarian; Jane C Ballantyne; Ann Berger; David Borsook; Wen G Chen; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Susan D Horn; Michael J Iadarola; Charles E Inturrisi; Lixing Lao; Sean Mackey; Jianren Mao; Andrea Sawczuk; George R Uhl; James Witter; Clifford J Woolf; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Yu Lin Journal: J Pain Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 5.820