Literature DB >> 11207392

Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids.

Martina Amanzio1, Antonella Pollo, Giuliano Maggi, Fabrizio Benedetti.   

Abstract

Individual differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the type of pain and the method of drug administration can account for the response variability to analgesics. By integrating a clinical and an experimental approach, we report here that another important source of variability is represented by individual differences in non-specific (placebo) activation of endogenous opioid systems. In the first part of this study, we analyzed the effectiveness of buprenorphine, tramadol, ketorolac and metamizol in the clinical setting, where the placebo effect was completely eliminated by means of hidden infusions. We found that the hidden injections were significantly less effective and less variable compared with open injections (in full view of the subject), suggesting that part of the response variability was due to non-specific factors (placebo). Since we could not administer the opioid antagonist, naloxone, to these patients, in the second part of this study, we induced experimental ischemic arm pain in healthy volunteers and found that, as occurred in clinical pain, the analgesic response to a hidden injection of the non-opioid ketorolac was less effective and less variable than an open injection. Most importantly, we obtained the same effects by adding naloxone to an open injection of ketorolac, thus blocking the opioid-mediated placebo component of analgesia. These findings indicate that both the psychological (hidden injection) and pharmacological (naloxone) blockade of the placebo response reduce the effectiveness of, and the response variability to, analgesic drugs. Therefore, an important source of response variability to analgesics appears to be due to differences in non-specific activation of endogenous opioid systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11207392     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00486-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  87 in total

1.  Reevaluating the placebo effect in medical practice.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Wayne B Jonas; John Killen; Franklin G Miller; David Shurtleff
Journal:  Z Psychol       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Is the increasing use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy causing the renaissance of complementary medicine?

Authors:  Samuel Vozeh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing?

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  The Soul in Medicine: Rabbinic and Scientific Controversies.

Authors:  Henri Zukier
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-12

5.  Debate on the use of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Robert W Jackson
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

Review 6.  Placebo analgesia: friend or foe?

Authors:  Donald D Price; Roger B Fillingim; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Uncovering the expectancy effect: the validation of the acupuncture expectancy scale.

Authors:  Jun J Mao; Sharon X Xie; Marjorie A Bowman
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.305

Review 8.  Understanding placebo and nocebo responses for pain management.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

9.  Placebo and Active Treatment Additivity in Placebo Analgesia: Research to Date and Future Directions.

Authors:  Matthew J Coleshill; Louise Sharpe; Luana Colloca; Robert Zachariae; Ben Colagiuri
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 10.  Clinical Use of Placebo Effects in Patients With Pain Disorders.

Authors:  Regine Klinger; Julia Stuhlreyer; Marie Schwartz; Julia Schmitz; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.