Literature DB >> 30456467

Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring: narrative review and expert panel recommendations from an ESICM task force.

Maurizio Cecconi1,2, Glenn Hernandez3, Martin Dunser4, Massimo Antonelli5, Tim Baker6,7, Jan Bakker3,8,9,10,11, Jacques Duranteau12,13, Sharon Einav14, A B Johan Groeneveld15, Tim Harris16,17, Sameer Jog18, Flavia R Machado19, Mervyn Mer20, M Ignacio Monge García21, Sheila Nainan Myatra22, Anders Perner23, Jean-Louis Teboul24,25, Jean-Louis Vincent26, Daniel De Backer27.   

Abstract

An international team of experts in the field of fluid resuscitation was invited by the ESICM to form a task force to systematically review the evidence concerning fluid administration using basic monitoring. The work included a particular emphasis on pre-ICU hospital settings and resource-limited settings. The work focused on four main questions: (1) What is the role of clinical assessment to guide fluid resuscitation in shock? (2) What basic monitoring is required to perform and interpret a fluid challenge? (3) What defines a fluid challenge in terms of fluid type, ranges of volume, and rate of administration? (4) What are the safety endpoints during a fluid challenge? The expert panel found insufficient evidence to provide recommendations according to the GRADE system, and was only able to make recommendations for basic interventions, based on the available evidence and expert opinion. The panel identified significant gaps in the scientific evidence on fluid administration outside the ICU (excluding the operating theater). Globally, scientific communities and health care systems should address these critical gaps in evidence through research on how basic fluid administration in resource-rich and resource-limited settings can be improved for the benefit of patients and societies worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid Responsivenss; Fluids; Intensive Care; Shock

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30456467     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  101 in total

1.  A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Neil Boyce; Julie French; John Myburgh; Robyn Norton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Understanding arterial load.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Paula Saludes Orduña; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Early peripheral perfusion-guided fluid therapy in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michel E van Genderen; Noel Engels; Ralf J P van der Valk; Alexandre Lima; Eva Klijn; Jan Bakker; Jasper van Bommel
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Persistent occult hypoperfusion is associated with a significant increase in infection rate and mortality in major trauma patients.

Authors:  J A Claridge; T D Crabtree; S J Pelletier; K Butler; R G Sawyer; J S Young
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-01

5.  ["Shock index"].

Authors:  M Allgöwer; C Burri
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1967-10-27       Impact factor: 0.628

6.  The ten principles behind arterial pressure.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Alexia Letierce; Olfa Hamzaoui; Denis Chemla; Nadia Anguel; David Osman; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; Wesley H Self; Todd W Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Maurizio Cecconi; Maria Cronhjort; Michael Darmon; Stephan M Jakob; Ville Pettilä; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Sharon Einav; Rupert Pearse; Samir Jaber; Peter Kranke; Frank J Overdyk; David K Whitaker; Federico Gordo; Albert Dahan; Andreas Hoeft
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The surviving sepsis campaign: fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy research priorities in adult patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 2.  Microcirculation: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Goksel Guven; Matthias P Hilty; Can Ince
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.

Authors:  Laura Evans; Andrew Rhodes; Waleed Alhazzani; Massimo Antonelli; Craig M Coopersmith; Craig French; Flávia R Machado; Lauralyn Mcintyre; Marlies Ostermann; Hallie C Prescott; Christa Schorr; Steven Simpson; W Joost Wiersinga; Fayez Alshamsi; Derek C Angus; Yaseen Arabi; Luciano Azevedo; Richard Beale; Gregory Beilman; Emilie Belley-Cote; Lisa Burry; Maurizio Cecconi; John Centofanti; Angel Coz Yataco; Jan De Waele; R Phillip Dellinger; Kent Doi; Bin Du; Elisa Estenssoro; Ricard Ferrer; Charles Gomersall; Carol Hodgson; Morten Hylander Møller; Theodore Iwashyna; Shevin Jacob; Ruth Kleinpell; Michael Klompas; Younsuck Koh; Anand Kumar; Arthur Kwizera; Suzana Lobo; Henry Masur; Steven McGloughlin; Sangeeta Mehta; Yatin Mehta; Mervyn Mer; Mark Nunnally; Simon Oczkowski; Tiffany Osborn; Elizabeth Papathanassoglou; Anders Perner; Michael Puskarich; Jason Roberts; William Schweickert; Maureen Seckel; Jonathan Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Tobias Welte; Janice Zimmerman; Mitchell Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Soufia Ayed; Francesca Moretto; Danila Azzolina; Nello De Vita; Francesco Gavelli; Simone Carelli; Arthur Pavot; Christopher Lai; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.334

5.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Fluid Resuscitation and Vasopressor Therapy Research Priorities in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.296

Review 6.  Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Francesca Collino; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

7.  Central venous pressure measurement is associated with improved outcomes in septic patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Zhu Zhu; Chenyan Zhao; Yanxia Guo; Dongyu Chen; Yao Wei; Jun Jin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  How to detect a positive response to a fluid bolus when cardiac output is not measured?

Authors:  Zakaria Ait-Hamou; Jean-Louis Teboul; Nadia Anguel; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Letter to the Editor: Stroke volume is the key measure of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Jon-Emile S Kenny; Igor Barjaktarevic
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Optimal target in septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Eduardo Kattan; Ricardo Castro; Magdalena Vera; Glenn Hernández
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.