| Literature DB >> 30456467 |
Maurizio Cecconi1,2, Glenn Hernandez3, Martin Dunser4, Massimo Antonelli5, Tim Baker6,7, Jan Bakker3,8,9,10,11, Jacques Duranteau12,13, Sharon Einav14, A B Johan Groeneveld15, Tim Harris16,17, Sameer Jog18, Flavia R Machado19, Mervyn Mer20, M Ignacio Monge García21, Sheila Nainan Myatra22, Anders Perner23, Jean-Louis Teboul24,25, Jean-Louis Vincent26, Daniel De Backer27.
Abstract
An international team of experts in the field of fluid resuscitation was invited by the ESICM to form a task force to systematically review the evidence concerning fluid administration using basic monitoring. The work included a particular emphasis on pre-ICU hospital settings and resource-limited settings. The work focused on four main questions: (1) What is the role of clinical assessment to guide fluid resuscitation in shock? (2) What basic monitoring is required to perform and interpret a fluid challenge? (3) What defines a fluid challenge in terms of fluid type, ranges of volume, and rate of administration? (4) What are the safety endpoints during a fluid challenge? The expert panel found insufficient evidence to provide recommendations according to the GRADE system, and was only able to make recommendations for basic interventions, based on the available evidence and expert opinion. The panel identified significant gaps in the scientific evidence on fluid administration outside the ICU (excluding the operating theater). Globally, scientific communities and health care systems should address these critical gaps in evidence through research on how basic fluid administration in resource-rich and resource-limited settings can be improved for the benefit of patients and societies worldwide.Entities:
Keywords: Fluid Responsivenss; Fluids; Intensive Care; Shock
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456467 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5415-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0342-4642 Impact factor: 17.440