Literature DB >> 23753039

Culturally targeted patient navigation for increasing african americans' adherence to screening colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.

Lina Jandorf1, Caitlyn Braschi, Elizabeth Ernstoff, Carrie R Wong, Linda Thelemaque, Gary Winkel, Hayley S Thompson, William H Redd, Steven H Itzkowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation has been an effective intervention to increase cancer screening rates. This study focuses on predicting outcomes of screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer among African Americans using different patient navigation formats.
METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial, patients more than 50 years of age without significant comorbidities were randomized into three navigation groups: peer-patient navigation (n = 181), pro-patient navigation (n = 123), and standard (n = 46). Pro-patient navigations were health care professionals who conducted culturally targeted navigation, whereas peer-patient navigations were community members trained in patient navigation who also discussed their personal experiences with screening colonoscopy. Two assessments gathered sociodemographic, medical, and intrapersonal information.
RESULTS: Screening colonoscopy completion rate was 75.7% across all groups with no significant differences in completion between the three study arms. Annual income more than $10,000 was an independent predictor of screening colonoscopy adherence. Unexpectedly, low social influence also predicted screening colonoscopy completion.
CONCLUSIONS: In an urban African American population, patient navigation was effective in increasing screening colonoscopy rates to 15% above the national average, regardless of patient navigation type or content. IMPACT: Because patient navigation successfully increases colonoscopy adherence, cultural targeting may not be necessary in some populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23753039      PMCID: PMC3769457          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  47 in total

1.  Disparities despite coverage: gaps in colorectal cancer screening among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Christopher B Forrest; Shibao Feng; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-10-10

2.  A lay educator approach to sickle cell disease education.

Authors:  A P Holmes; J Hatch; G A Robinson
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  1992 Spring-Summer

3.  The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  S A Flocke; K C Stange; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; M R Andersen; A M Stoddard; N Urban; B K Rimer; D S Lane; S A Fox; M E Costanza
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting.

Authors:  Denis Nash; Sulaiman Azeez; David Vlahov; Melissa Schori
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Increasing mammography and breast self-examination in African American women using the Witness Project model.

Authors:  D O Erwin; T S Spatz; R C Stotts; J A Hollenberg; L A Deloney
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators in older persons.

Authors:  Idris Guessous; Chiranjeev Dash; Pauline Lapin; Mary Doroshenk; Robert A Smith; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Understanding the barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among low income immigrant hispanics.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Jennie Ellison; Cristina Villagra; Gary Winkel; Alejandro Varela; Zeida Quintero-Canetti; Anabella Castillo; Linda Thélémaque; Sheba King; Katherine Duhamel
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2010-08

9.  Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population.

Authors:  Peter C Raich; Elizabeth M Whitley; William Thorland; Patricia Valverde; Diane Fairclough
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Elizabeth Medlin; Sandra Lisboa; Lisa Valley-Shah; Robert H Fletcher; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  50 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Reinier G S Meester; Samir Gupta; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences among Black and Latino Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Sumedha V Chablani; Noah Cohen; Drusilla White; Steven H Itzkowitz; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-10

3.  Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Strategies African-American Cancer Survivors Use to Overcome Fears and Fatalistic Attitudes.

Authors:  Jill B Hamilton; Nakia C Best; Kayoll V Galbraith; Valarie C Worthy; L T C Angelo D Moore
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Reuland; Alison T Brenner; Richard Hoffman; Andrew McWilliams; Robert L Rhyne; Christina Getrich; Hazel Tapp; Mark A Weaver; Danelle Callan; Laura Cubillos; Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ajeesh Sunny; Luis Rustveld
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Predicting Colonoscopy Screening Behavior and Future Screening Intentions for African Americans Older than 50 Years.

Authors:  Lynne B Klasko-Foster; Lina M Jandorf; Deborah O Erwin; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.104

8.  Colorectal neoplasia detection among black and Latino individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristen K Lee; Lina Jandorf; Linda Thélèmaque; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Lina Jandorf; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature.

Authors:  Amy E Ustjanauskas; Marissa Bredice; Sumayah Nuhaily; Lisa Kath; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.