Literature DB >> 23752432

What the French ban of Bt MON810 maize means for science-based risk assessment.

Marcel Kuntz, John Davison, Agnès E Ricroch.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23752432     DOI： 10.1038/nbt.2613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN： 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Confronting the Gordian knot.

Authors:  L Val Giddings; Ingo Potrykus; Klaus Ammann; Nina V Fedoroff
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Determination of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein in soil collected in the final growing seasons of a nine-year field trial of Bt-maize MON810.

Authors:  Helga Gruber; Vijay Paul; Heinrich H D Meyer; Martin Müller
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones.

Authors:  Maite Sabalza; Bruna Miralpeix; Richard M Twyman; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  The postmodern assault on science. If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?

Authors:  Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Why the postmodern attitude towards science should be denounced.

Authors:  Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment.

Authors:  M K Sears; R L Hellmich; D E Stanley-Horn; K S Oberhauser; J M Pleasants; H R Mattila; B D Siegfried; G P Dively
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified?

Authors:  Agnès Ricroch; Jean Baptiste Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.788
  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Science-based risk assessment requires careful evaluation of all studies.

Authors:  Fern Wickson; Thomas Bøhn; Brian Wynne; Angelika Hilbeck; Silvio Funtowicz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Society and GMOs--chicken and egg? The lessons from the GM crops debate in Europe over risk management and communication provide valuable pointers for the upcoming debate on GM animals.

Authors:  Núria Vàzquez-Salat; Louis-Marie Houdebine
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Jaime Aguilera; Zoltán Diveki; Ana Gomes; Yi Liu; Claudia Paoletti; Patrick du Jardin; Lieve Herman; Joe N Perry; Elisabeth Waigmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  The GMO case in France: politics, lawlessness and postmodernism.

Authors:  Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 6.  New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.

Authors:  John Davison; Klaus Ammann
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 7.  Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.

Authors:  Jan M Lucht
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 8.  Public Submissions on the Uganda National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 Reveal Potential Way Forward for Uganda Legislators to Pass the Bill.

Authors:  Clet Wandui Masiga
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-06

9.  Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Phil Macdonald
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 10.  Perspectives on genetically modified crops and food detection.

Authors:  Chih-Hui Lin; Tzu-Ming Pan
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.157
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.