Literature DB >> 23750846

Can ultrasound be used to estimate bone mineral density in children with growth problems?

Khalid M Khan1, Kyriakie Sarafoglou, Arif Somani, Brigitte Frohnert, Bradley S Miller.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess predictability of bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using by ultrasound speed of sound of the right and left radii (SOS-R and SOS-L) in patients with growth problems.
METHODS: Ultrasound and DXA were compared in patients with advanced, normal and delayed bone ages assessed by Greulich and Pyle (GP) and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW3) methods.
RESULTS: There was a strong correlation (r), of raw scores, between SOS-R and SOS-L, r = 0.81, p = 0.000 and their respective Z-scores, r = 0.78, p = 0.000. Z-score correlations were poor between SOS-R or SOS-L and LS-BMD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of SOS-R and Z-scores for predicting normal (>-1 to <1) and low (<-1) LS-BMD were poor. For high (>1) LS-BMD, Z-scores were 22%, 93%, 29% and 90%, respectively, for SOS-R and for SOS-L, 25%, 89%, 20% and 91%. For very low (<-2) LS-BMD, SOS-R and SOS-L were the same, respectively, 29%, 91%, 40% and 86%.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound of the radius is a poor predictor of radiologically assessed BMD at the LS, especially with delayed bone age. ©2013 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed bone age; Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; Growth; Radial ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23750846      PMCID: PMC4886708          DOI: 10.1111/apa.12314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  17 in total

1.  Clinical report—bone densitometry in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Laura K Bachrach; Irene N Sills
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Comparison between broad-band ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneum and total body bone mineral density in children.

Authors:  M Z Mughal; C M Langton; G Utretch; J Morrison; B L Specker
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  Role of serology and routine laboratory tests in childhood inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Khalid Khan; Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg; Harvey Sharp; Deborah Greenwood; Sally Weisdorf-Schindele
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.325

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Quantitative tibial ultrasonometry versus radiographic phalangeal absorptiometry in a Caucasian pediatric population.

Authors:  M H Lequin; R R van Rijn; S G Robben; W J van Leeuwen; W C Hop; C van Kuijk
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound are not interchangeable in diagnosing abnormal bones.

Authors:  J E Williams; C M Wilson; L Biassoni; R Suri; M S Fewtrell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications.

Authors:  V Gilsanz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Bone quantitative ultrasound and nutritional status in severely handicapped institutionalized children and adolescents.

Authors:  C Hartman; R Brik; A Tamir; J Merrick; R Shamir
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Assessment of osteoporosis by quantitative ultrasound versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in children with chronic rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Corina Hartman; Raanan Shamir; Orly Eshach-Adiv; Galina Iosilevsky; Riva Brik
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Use of quantitative ultrasound to assess bone status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study.

Authors:  C F Njeh; N Shaw; J M Gardner-Medwin; C M Boivin; T R Southwood
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Follow-up Association Study of Genetic Variants for Bone Mineral Density in a Korean Population.

Authors:  Seokjin Ham; Tae-Young Roh
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2014-09-30

2.  The utility of ultrasonographic bone age determination in detecting growth disturbances; a comparative study with the conventional radiographic technique.

Authors:  Parisa Hajalioghli; Mohammad Kazem Tarzamni; Sara Arami; Daniel Fadaei Fouladi; Morteza Ghojazadeh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Bone health in children and adolescents: the available imaging techniques.

Authors:  Stefano Stagi; Loredana Cavalli; Chiara Iurato; Salvatore Seminara; Maria Luisa Brandi; Maurizio de Martino
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-09

4.  Radial quantitative ultrasound and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: intermethod agreement for bone status assessment in children.

Authors:  Kar Hau Chong; Bee Koon Poh; Nor Aini Jamil; Nor Azmi Kamaruddin; Paul Deurenberg
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Determinants of bone mineral density through quantitative ultrasound screening of healthy children visiting ambulatory paediatric clinics.

Authors:  Abdulmoein E Al-Agha; Yousof O Kabli; Melissa G AlBeiruty; Asmaa A Milyani
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.484

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.