Literature DB >> 23747986

Development and pilot testing of a video-assisted informed consent process.

Susan C Sonne1, Jeannette O Andrews, Stephanie M Gentilin, Stephanie Oppenheimer, Jihad Obeid, Kathleen Brady, Sharon Wolf, Randal Davis, Kathryn Magruder.   

Abstract

The informed consent process for research has come under scrutiny, as consent documents are increasingly long and difficult to understand. Innovations are needed to improve comprehension in order to make the consent process truly informed. We report on the development and pilot testing of video clips that could be used during the consent process to better explain research procedures to potential participants. Based on input from researchers and community partners, 15 videos of common research procedures/concepts were produced. The utility of the videos was then tested by embedding them in mock-informed consent documents that were presented via an online electronic consent system designed for delivery via iPad. Three mock consents were developed, each containing five videos. All participants (n = 61) read both a paper version and the video-assisted iPad version of the same mock consent and were randomized to which format they reviewed first. Participants were given a competency quiz that posed specific questions about the information in the consent after reviewing the first consent document to which they were exposed. Most participants (78.7%) preferred the video-assisted format compared to paper (12.9%). Nearly all (96.7%) reported that the videos improved their understanding of the procedures described in the consent document; however, the comprehension of material did not significantly differ by consent format. Results suggest videos may be helpful in providing participants with information about study procedures in a way that is easy to understand. Additional testing of video consents for complex protocols and with subjects of lower literacy is warranted.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic forms; Informed consent process; Tablet computing; Videos

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747986      PMCID: PMC3769445          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  17 in total

1.  Enhancing comprehension of consent for research in older patients with psychosis: a randomized study of a novel consent procedure.

Authors:  L B Dunn; L A Lindamer; B W Palmer; L J Schneiderman; D V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.

Authors:  James Flory; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials.

Authors:  P Fortun; J West; L Chalkley; A Shonde; C Hawkey
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2008-05-16

4.  Effects of writing/speaking on comprehension of information for informed consent.

Authors:  J M Sorrell
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Evaluating the quality of informed consent.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman; Philip W Lavori; Maryann Boeger; Carole Cain; Robert Edsond; Vicki Morrison; Shing Shing Yeh
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Patient-reported conformity of informed consent procedures and participation in clinical research.

Authors:  T Agoritsas; T V Perneger
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2010-09-22

8.  Videotape aids informed consent decision.

Authors:  G L Barbour; M J Blumenkrantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand?

Authors:  K D Hopper; T R TenHave; J Hartzel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.

Authors:  R E Ryan; M J Prictor; K J McLaughlin; S J Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  18 in total

1.  Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Janice L Krieger; Dorothy Hagmajer; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.

Authors:  Eugene I Kane; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-10-31

3.  Use of an iPad™ application in preoperative counseling for pelvic reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Casey L Kinman; Kate V Meriwether; Cayse M Powell; Deslyn T G Hobson; Jeremy T Gaskins; Sean L Francis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Evaluating the Perceptions of Teleconsent in Urban and Rural Communities.

Authors:  Saif Khairat; Katie Tirtanadi; Paige Ottmar; Betsy Sleath; Jihad Obeid
Journal:  Eur J Biomed Inform (Praha)       Date:  2019-07-05

5.  Recall and decay of consent information among parents of infants participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial using an audio-visual tool in The Gambia.

Authors:  Robert B Mboizi; Muhammed O Afolabi; Michael Okoye; Beate Kampmann; Anna Roca; Olubukola T Idoko
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Gesualdo; Margherita Daverio; Laura Palazzani; Dimitris Dimitriou; Javier Diez-Domingo; Jaime Fons-Martinez; Sally Jackson; Pascal Vignally; Caterina Rizzo; Alberto Eugenio Tozzi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Patient-Reported Use of Personalized Video Recordings to Improve Neurosurgical Patient-Provider Communication.

Authors:  Andrew J Meeusen; Randall Porter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-02

8.  Use of Multimedia Technology in the Doctor-Patient Relationship for Obtaining Patient Informed Consent.

Authors:  Andrzej Michalski; Marcin Stopa; Bogdan Miśkowiak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-10-26

9.  Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations in Medical Research: Perceptions and Experiences of Older Italians, Their Families, Ethics Administrators and Researchers.

Authors:  Robyn Woodward-Kron; Jo-Anne Hughson; Anna Parker; Agnese Bresin; John Hajek; Ute Knoch; Tuong Dien Phan; David Story
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2016-04-26

Review 10.  A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Hughson; Robyn Woodward-Kron; Anna Parker; John Hajek; Agnese Bresin; Ute Knoch; Tuong Phan; David Story
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.