Eugene I Kane1, Joseph J Gallo2. 1. a Office of Clinical Research , National Institute of Mental Health. 2. b Department of Mental Health , Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Questions have been raised by researchers and ethics committees about whether human research subjects comprehend study participation when signing a research consent form. METHODS: To determine existing beliefs about the informed consent review process, impediments to shorter consent, and augmented/alternative consent methods, a survey of institutional review board (IRB) chairpersons was conducted. RESULTS: IRB chairs expressed concern with (but do not often assess) the length, complexity, and reading level of the consent form or participant comprehension. IRB chairs reported varied (but generally low) familiarity, acceptance, and use of possible solutions and alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Best practice standards should be developed for (1) assessing consent form reading level; (2) measuring and monitoring participant comprehension; (3) alternative consent methods and enhancements; and (4) electronic signatures.
BACKGROUND: Questions have been raised by researchers and ethics committees about whether human research subjects comprehend study participation when signing a research consent form. METHODS: To determine existing beliefs about the informed consent review process, impediments to shorter consent, and augmented/alternative consent methods, a survey of institutional review board (IRB) chairpersons was conducted. RESULTS: IRB chairs expressed concern with (but do not often assess) the length, complexity, and reading level of the consent form or participant comprehension. IRB chairs reported varied (but generally low) familiarity, acceptance, and use of possible solutions and alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Best practice standards should be developed for (1) assessing consent form reading level; (2) measuring and monitoring participant comprehension; (3) alternative consent methods and enhancements; and (4) electronic signatures.
Authors: Aaron S Fink; Allan V Prochazka; William G Henderson; Debra Bartenfeld; Carsie Nyirenda; Alexandra Webb; David H Berger; Kamal Itani; Thomas Whitehill; James Edwards; Mark Wilson; Cynthia Karsonovich; Patricia Parmelee Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Fernanda Mexas; Anne Efron; Ronir Raggio Luiz; Michelle Cailleaux-Cezar; Richard E Chaisson; Marcus B Conde Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Evelien De Sutter; Drieda Zaçe; Stefania Boccia; Maria Luisa Di Pietro; David Geerts; Pascal Borry; Isabelle Huys Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stephanie A Kraft; Kathryn M Porter; Devan M Duenas; Erin Sullivan; Maya Rowland; Brian E Saelens; Benjamin S Wilfond; Seema K Shah Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-07-01