Literature DB >> 25295881

Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Wenhua Cao1, Gino Lim, Li Liao, Yupeng Li, Shengpeng Jiang, Xiaoqiang Li, Heng Li, Kazumichi Suzuki, X Ronald Zhu, Daniel Gomez, Xiaodong Zhang.   

Abstract

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is commonly delivered via the spot-scanning technique. To 'scan' the target volume, the proton beam is controlled by varying its energy to penetrate the patient's body at different depths. Although scanning the proton beamlets or spots with the same energy can be as fast as 10-20 m s(-1), changing from one proton energy to another requires approximately two additional seconds. The total IMPT delivery time thus depends mainly on the number of proton energies used in a treatment. Current treatment planning systems typically use all proton energies that are required for the proton beam to penetrate in a range from the distal edge to the proximal edge of the target. The optimal selection of proton energies has not been well studied. In this study, we sought to determine the feasibility of optimizing and reducing the number of proton energies in IMPT planning. We proposed an iterative mixed-integer programming optimization method to select a subset of all available proton energies while satisfying dosimetric criteria. We applied our proposed method to six patient datasets: four cases of prostate cancer, one case of lung cancer, and one case of mesothelioma. The numbers of energies were reduced by 14.3%-18.9% for the prostate cancer cases, 11.0% for the lung cancer cases and 26.5% for the mesothelioma case. The results indicate that the number of proton energies used in conventionally designed IMPT plans can be reduced without degrading dosimetric performance. The IMPT delivery efficiency could be improved by energy layer optimization leading to increased throughput for a busy proton center in which a delivery system with slow energy switch is employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25295881      PMCID: PMC4371785          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  29 in total

1.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning.

Authors:  S Webb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  H Edwin Romeijn; Ravindra K Ahuja; James F Dempsey; Arvind Kumar; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimization of beam parameters and treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10

5.  Degeneracy, frequency response and filtering in IMRT optimization.

Authors:  Jorge Llacer; Nzhde Agazaryan; Timothy D Solberg; Claus Promberger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The clinical potential of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Antony J Lomax; Eros Pedroni; Hanspeter Rutz; Gudrun Goitein
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.820

7.  Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Paul L Nguyen; John J Coen; Karen P Doppke; Robert J Schneider; Judith A Adams; Thomas R Bortfeld; Anthony L Zietman; Thomas F Delaney; William U Shipley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Timothy C Y Chan; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  D Pflugfelder; J J Wilkens; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Demonstration of scan path optimization in proton therapy.

Authors:  Joanne H Kang; Jan J Wilkens; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  A novel energy layer optimization framework for spot-scanning proton arc therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Qihui Lyu; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Synchrotron-Based Pencil Beam Scanning Nozzle with an Integrated Mini-Ridge Filter: A Dosimetric Study to Optimize Treatment Delivery.

Authors:  Xianliang Wang; Yupeng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Heng Li; Koichi Miyazaki; Rintaro Fujimoto; Hiroshi Akiyama; Michael T Gillin; Falk Poenisch; Narayan Sahoo; David Grosshans; Brandon Gunn; Steven Jay Frank; Pei Wang; Jinyi Lang; Qing Hou; Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.

Authors:  Maryam Zaghian; Wenhua Cao; Wei Liu; Laleh Kardar; Sharmalee Randeniya; Radhe Mohan; Gino Lim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Developing an accurate model of spot-scanning treatment delivery time and sequence for a compact superconducting synchrocyclotron proton therapy system.

Authors:  Lewei Zhao; Gang Liu; Shupeng Chen; Jiajian Shen; Weili Zheng; An Qin; Di Yan; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.309

Review 6.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Redefine the role of range shifter in treating bilateral head and neck cancer in the era of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Xuanfeng Ding; Xiaoqiang Li; An Qin; Jun Zhou; Di Yan; Peter Chen; Chinnaiyan Prakash; Craig Stevens; Rohan Deraniyagala; Peyman Kabolizadeh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  Future Developments in Charged Particle Therapy: Improving Beam Delivery for Efficiency and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jacinta Yap; Andrea De Franco; Suzie Sheehy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Linear Energy Transfer Incorporated Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy Optimization: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding; Weili Zheng; Gang Liu; Guillaume Janssens; Kevin Souris; Ana M Barragán-Montero; Di Yan; Craig Stevens; Peyman Kabolizadeh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.