Literature DB >> 23746611

Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification.

David Smadja1, David Touboul, Ayala Cohen, Etti Doveh, Marcony R Santhiago, Glauco R Mello, Ronald R Krueger, Joseph Colin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a method for automatizing the detection of subclinical keratoconus based on a tree classification.
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
METHODS: setting: University Hospital of Bordeaux. participants: A total of 372 eyes of 197 patients were enrolled: 177 normal eyes of 95 subjects, 47 eyes of 47 patients with forme fruste keratoconus, and 148 eyes of 102 patients with keratoconus. observation procedure: All eyes were imaged with a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Fifty-five parameters derived from anterior and posterior corneal measurements were analyzed for each eye and a machine learning algorithm, the classification and regression tree, was used to classify the eyes into the 3 above-mentioned conditions. main outcome measures: The performance of the machine learning algorithm for classifying eye conditions was evaluated, and the curvature, elevation, pachymetric, and wavefront parameters were analyzed in each group and compared.
RESULTS: The discriminating rules generated with the automated decision tree classifier allowed for discrimination between normal and keratoconus with 100% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity, and between normal and forme fruste keratoconus with 93.6% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity. The algorithm selected as the most discriminant variables parameters related to posterior surface asymmetry and thickness spatial distribution.
CONCLUSION: The machine learning classifier showed very good performance for discriminating between normal corneas and forme fruste keratoconus and provided a tool that is closer to an automated medical reasoning. This might help in the surgical decision before refractive surgery by providing a good sensitivity in detecting ectasia-susceptible corneas.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746611     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  38 in total

1.  Correlation between visual function and refractive, topographic, pachymetric and aberrometric data in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Neslihan Bayraktar Bilen; Ibrahim F Hepsen; Carlos G Arce
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Jihan Akhtar; Michael J Lynn; Renato Ambrósio; William J Dupps; Ronald R Krueger; Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis.

Authors:  Oren Golan; Andre L Piccinini; Eric S Hwang; Ildamaris Montes De Oca Gonzalez; Mark Krauthammer; Sumitra S Khandelwal; David Smadja; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert.

Authors:  Eyal Cohen; Dor Bank; Nir Sorkin; Raja Giryes; David Varssano
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.029

5.  Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Winston Chamberlain; Ou Tan; Robert Brass; Jack L Weiss; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Screening Candidates for Refractive Surgery With Corneal Tomographic-Based Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yi Xie; Lanqin Zhao; Xiaonan Yang; Xiaohang Wu; Yahan Yang; Xiaoman Huang; Fang Liu; Jiping Xu; Limian Lin; Haiqin Lin; Qiting Feng; Haotian Lin; Quan Liu
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure and Other Biomechanical Parameters to Distinguish between Subclinical Keratoconus and Healthy Corneas.

Authors:  Cristina Peris-Martínez; María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; María Carmen García-Domene; María Dolores Pinazo-Durán; María José Luque-Cobija; María Ángeles Del Buey-Sayas; Susana Ortí-Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Forme Fruste Keratoconus Imaging and Validation via Novel Multi-Spot Reflection Topography.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-25

10.  Keratoconus detection of changes using deep learning of colour-coded maps.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Jiaxin Zhao; Katja C Iselin; Davide Borroni; Davide Romano; Akilesh Gokul; Charles N J McGhee; Yitian Zhao; Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Mohammed Ziaei; Stephen Kaye; Vito Romano; Yalin Zheng
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.