Literature DB >> 32215587

Screening Candidates for Refractive Surgery With Corneal Tomographic-Based Deep Learning.

Yi Xie1, Lanqin Zhao1, Xiaonan Yang1, Xiaohang Wu1, Yahan Yang1, Xiaoman Huang1, Fang Liu1, Jiping Xu1, Limian Lin1, Haiqin Lin1, Qiting Feng1, Haotian Lin1,2, Quan Liu1.   

Abstract

Importance: Evaluating corneal morphologic characteristics with corneal tomographic scans before refractive surgery is necessary to exclude patients with at-risk corneas and keratoconus. In previous studies, researchers performed screening with machine learning methods based on specific corneal parameters. To date, a deep learning algorithm has not been used in combination with corneal tomographic scans. Objective: To examine the use of a deep learning model in the screening of candidates for refractive surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A diagnostic, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China, with examination dates extending from July 18, 2016, to March 29, 2019. The investigation was performed from July 2, 2018, to June 28, 2019. Participants included 1385 patients; 6465 corneal tomographic images were used to generate the artificial intelligence (AI) model. The Pentacam HR system was used for data collection. Interventions: The deidentified images were analyzed by ophthalmologists and the AI model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The performance of the AI classification system.
Results: A classification system centered on the AI model Pentacam InceptionResNetV2 Screening System (PIRSS) was developed for screening potential candidates for refractive surgery. The model achieved an overall detection accuracy of 94.7% (95% CI, 93.3%-95.8%) on the validation data set. Moreover, on the independent test data set, the PIRSS model achieved an overall detection accuracy of 95% (95% CI, 88.8%-97.8%), which was comparable with that of senior ophthalmologists who are refractive surgeons (92.8%; 95% CI, 91.2%-94.4%) (P = .72). In distinguishing corneas with contraindications for refractive surgery, the PIRSS model performed better than the classifiers (95% vs 81%; P < .001) in the Pentacam HR system on an Asian patient database. Conclusions and Relevance: PIRSS appears to be useful in classifying images to provide corneal information and preliminarily identify at-risk corneas. PIRSS may provide guidance to refractive surgeons in screening candidates for refractive surgery as well as for generalized clinical application for Asian patients, but its use needs to be confirmed in other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32215587      PMCID: PMC7099445          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  35 in total

1.  Screening of prior refractive surgery by a wavelet-based neural network.

Authors:  M K Smolek; S D Klyce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Neural network-based system for early keratoconus detection from corneal topography.

Authors:  P Agostino Accardo; Stefano Pensiero
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Corneal ectasia risk score: statistical validity and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Michael W Belin; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  [Central and peripheral corneal pachymetry--standard evaluation with the Pentacam system].

Authors:  F Rüfer; A Schröder; M-K Arvani; C Erb
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Validation of an Objective Keratoconus Detection System Implemented in a Scheimpflug Tomographer and Comparison With Other Methods.

Authors:  Irene Ruiz Hidalgo; Jos J Rozema; Alain Saad; Damien Gatinel; Pablo Rodriguez; Nadia Zakaria; Carina Koppen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Neural network classification of corneal topography. Preliminary demonstration.

Authors:  N Maeda; S D Klyce; M K Smolek
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Corneal topography: history, technique, and clinical uses.

Authors:  J Brody; S Waller; M Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1994

8.  Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.

Authors:  Maria Clara Arbelaez; Francesco Versaci; Gabriele Vestri; Piero Barboni; Giacomo Savini
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Identifying Medical Diagnoses and Treatable Diseases by Image-Based Deep Learning.

Authors:  Daniel S Kermany; Michael Goldbaum; Wenjia Cai; Carolina C S Valentim; Huiying Liang; Sally L Baxter; Alex McKeown; Ge Yang; Xiaokang Wu; Fangbing Yan; Justin Dong; Made K Prasadha; Jacqueline Pei; Magdalene Y L Ting; Jie Zhu; Christina Li; Sierra Hewett; Jason Dong; Ian Ziyar; Alexander Shi; Runze Zhang; Lianghong Zheng; Rui Hou; William Shi; Xin Fu; Yaou Duan; Viet A N Huu; Cindy Wen; Edward D Zhang; Charlotte L Zhang; Oulan Li; Xiaobo Wang; Michael A Singer; Xiaodong Sun; Jie Xu; Ali Tafreshi; M Anthony Lewis; Huimin Xia; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Screening patients with the corneal navigator.

Authors:  Stephen D Klyce; Michael D Karon; Michael K Smolek
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  8 in total

1.  Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert.

Authors:  Eyal Cohen; Dor Bank; Nir Sorkin; Raja Giryes; David Varssano
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Artificial Intelligence for Refractive Surgery Screening: Finding the Balance Between Myopia and Hype-ropia.

Authors:  Travis K Redd; J Peter Campbell; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Howard Maile; Ji-Peng Olivia Li; Daniel Gore; Marcello Leucci; Padraig Mulholland; Scott Hau; Anita Szabo; Ismail Moghul; Konstantinos Balaskas; Kaoru Fujinami; Pirro Hysi; Alice Davidson; Petra Liskova; Alison Hardcastle; Stephen Tuft; Nikolas Pontikos
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 4.  Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Myopia: Current and Future Directions.

Authors:  Chenchen Zhang; Jing Zhao; Zhe Zhu; Yanxia Li; Ke Li; Yuanping Wang; Yajuan Zheng
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-11

5.  Decision Tree Algorithm for Visual Art Design in a Psychotherapy System for College Students.

Authors:  Han Wang; Xiang Ji; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.565

6.  Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Hyunmin Ahn; Na Eun Kim; Jae Lim Chung; Young Jun Kim; Ikhyun Jun; Tae-Im Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 7.  Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tariq Alasbali
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 1.974

8.  [Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST : A study based on algorithms of machine learning].

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Larissa Häfner; Timo Eppig; Berthold Seitz; Nóra Szentmáry; Elias Flockerzi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.059

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.