Literature DB >> 23744609

Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies.

M M Gil1, M S Quezada, B Bregant, M Ferraro, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of routine maternal blood cell-free (cf) DNA testing in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 at 10 weeks' gestation.
METHOD: In this prospective study, women attending The Fetal Medicine Centre in London, UK, between October 2012 and April 2013, with singleton pregnancy and live fetus with CRL 32-45 mm, were screened for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cfDNA testing at 10 weeks and the combined test at 12 weeks.
RESULTS: cfDNA testing was performed in 1005 singleton pregnancies with a median maternal age of 37 (range, 20-49) years. Risks for trisomies were provided for 957 (95.2%) cases and in 98.0% these were available within 14 days from sampling. In 48 (4.8%) cases no result was provided due to problems with delivery to the laboratory, low fetal fraction or assay failure. Repeat sampling was performed in 40 cases and a result obtained in 27 (67.5%) of these. In 11 cases the risk score for trisomy 21 and in five cases that for trisomy 18 was > 99%, in one the risk for trisomy 13 was 34% and in 968 the risk for each of the three trisomies was < 0.01%. The suspected trisomies were confirmed by karyotyping after chorionic villus sampling (CVS), except in one case of trisomy 18 in which the karyotype was normal. On the basis of the maternal age distribution of the study population, the expected and observed numbers for each of the three trisomies were similar. Both cfDNA and combined testing detected all trisomies, but the estimated false-positive rates (FPR) were 0.1% and 3.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Routine screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cfDNA testing at 10 weeks is feasible and has a lower FPR than does combined testing, but abnormal results require confirmation by CVS.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23744609     DOI: 10.1002/uog.12504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  34 in total

1.  Discrepancy in fetal sex assignment between cell free fetal DNA and ultrasound.

Authors:  J I Iruretagoyena; M Grady; D Shah
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Repeated failed non-invasive prenatal testing in a woman with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid syndrome: lessons learnt.

Authors:  C Y Y Hui; W C Tan; E L Tan; L K Tan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-05

3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome abnormalities: a source of confusion.

Authors:  Erkan Kalafat; Mehmet Murat Seval; Batuhan Turgay; Acar Koç
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 4.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

5.  The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Emily Suskin; Laura Hercher; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Komal Bajaj
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road?

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Louise Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  A prospective clinical trial to compare the performance of dried blood spots prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with conventional non-invasive testing technology.

Authors:  Huiying Hu; Yulin Jiang; Minghui Zhang; Shanying Liu; Na Hao; Jing Zhou; Juntao Liu; Xiaojin Zhang; Liangkun Ma
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-01-05

8.  Use of amniotic fluid for determining pregnancies at risk of preterm birth and for studying diseases of potential environmental etiology.

Authors:  Laura A Geer; Benny F G Pycke; David M Sherer; Ovadia Abulafia; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 9.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  The utilization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA testing and decrease in invasive diagnostic procedures: an institutional experience.

Authors:  K E Pettit; A D Hull; L Korty; M C Jones; D H Pretorius
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.