Literature DB >> 23743715

Action strategies used by children to avoid two vertical obstacles in non-confined space.

Amy L Hackney1, Michael E Cinelli.   

Abstract

Information used to determine the action strategies necessary to successfully pass through apertures is based on the dimensions of the individual and the mover's action capabilities (Warren in J Exp Psychol 10:683-703, 1984; Warren and Whang in J Exp Psychol 13:371-383, 1987). Previous research has demonstrated that when children must pass through small spaces, they will produce a shoulder rotation at apertures 1.6 times their shoulder width and smaller (i.e., critical point) and their avoidance strategies are based more on dynamic than geometric measures (Snapp-Childs and Bingham in Exp Brain Res 198:527-533, 2009; Wilmut and Barnett in Exp Brain Res 210:185-194, 2011). The question remains as to whether similar strategies exist when children are given a choice in their obstacle avoidance strategy. The current study aimed to determine the action strategies employed by children when confronted with a non-confined obstacle avoidance task. Specifically, the study intended to identify the aperture width that elicited a change in action (e.g., a shoulder rotation or a change in travel path). Children (N = 12, mean age = 7.1 years, ±0.2) were instructed to walk along a 10-m path toward a visible goal located at the end of the pathway and avoid colliding with the two vertical obstacles placed halfway (5 m) down the path on either side of the midline. The space between the obstacles ranged between 0.6 and 1.8 times the participant's shoulder width (presented in increments of 0.2). Results revealed that when the aperture was too small for straight passage, children choose to circumvent the obstacles rather than rotate their shoulders the majority of the time. However, unlike young and older adults (Hackney and Cinelli in Gait Posture 37:93-97, 2013a, Exp Brain Res 225:419-429, 2013b), this strategy was not used consistently. Instead, changes in travel path were highly variable both across participants and within trials. This variability suggests that a true critical point cannot be established for children in this non-confined task. Variable actions at the time of crossing were significantly correlated with the medial-lateral center of mass variability during the approach to the obstacles. These results further support the idea that children's actions may be more affected by dynamic factors than geometric measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743715     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3585-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space.

Authors:  Martin Gérin-Lajoie; Carol L Richards; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Travel path conditions dictate the manner in which individuals avoid collisions.

Authors:  Michael E Cinelli; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The affordance of barrier crossing in young children exhibits dynamic, not geometric, similarity.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Action strategies of older adults walking through apertures.

Authors:  Amy L Hackney; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Young and older adults use body-scaled information during a non-confined aperture crossing task.

Authors:  Amy L Hackney; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances.

Authors:  W H Warren; S Whang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  What infants know and what they do: perceiving possibilities for walking through openings.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05

8.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing.

Authors:  W H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Emma C Celano; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perception of whether an object can be carried through an aperture depends on anticipated speed.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Eric A Malek
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2007
View more
  3 in total

1.  Motor decisions are not black and white: selecting actions in the "gray zone".

Authors:  D M Comalli; D Persand; K E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Flexibility in action: Development of locomotion under overhead barriers.

Authors:  Jaya Rachwani; Orit Herzberg; Brianna E Kaplan; David M Comalli; Sinclaire O'Grady; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2022-03-21

3.  Walking through an aperture with visual information obtained at a distance.

Authors:  Daisuke Muroi; Takahiro Higuchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.