| Literature DB >> 23738809 |
Michal Cachovan1, Alexander Hans Vija, Joachim Hornegger, Torsten Kuwert.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routine single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) currently lacks quantitative information on regional activity concentration (ACC) of the injected tracer (e.g. kBq/ml). Furthermore, little is known on the skeletal absolute concentration of 99mTc-DPD after intravenous injection in bone scintigraphy. The aim of this study is to determine ACC in the healthy lumbar vertebrae of patients using a recently published quantitative SPECT/computed tomography (CT) protocol.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23738809 PMCID: PMC3680030 DOI: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-45
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Figure 1Transverse and coronal images of a patient's SPECT/CT fused data sets including the three lower LV. The ellipses depict the VOIs selected.
Statistical analysis of all variables collected for 50 female patients and 133 vertebral bodies
| Age (years) | 69.88 | 13.73 | 65.98 to 73.78 |
| Weight (kg) | 69.39 | 13.38 | 65.59 to 73.19 |
| Height (cm) | 160.72 | 6.05 | 159.00 to 162.44 |
| Administered activity (MBq) | 562.84 | 102.33 | 533.76 to 591.92 |
| Activity per 1 kg BW (MBq/kg) | 8.26 | 1.41 | 7.86 to 8.66 |
| ACC (kBq/ml) | 48.15 | 13.66 | 45.81 to 50.50 |
| ACC (SUVBW) | 5.91 | 1.54 | 5.64 to 6.17 |
| ACC (SUVLBW) | 3.89 | 0.92 | 3.74 to 4.05 |
| ACC (SUVBSA) | 5.93 | 1.40 | 5.69 to 6.17 |
| % ID per ml (10−3) | 8.75 | 2.23 | 8.12 to 9.39 |
| Bone density (HU) | 106.52 | 58.00 | 96.57 to 116.46 |
| LAC (cm−1) | 0.168 | 0.007 | 0.167 to 0.170 |
ACC activity concentration, BW body weight, BSA body surface area, CI confidence interval, HU Hounsfield units, % ID percentage of injected dose, LAC linear attenuation coefficient, LBW lean body weight, SD standard deviation, SUV standardised uptake value.
Figure 2Correlation plot between ACC and bone density. ACC (expressed as SUVBW) is on the vertical axis, and bone density (HU) is on the horizontal axis. The dark red dashed curves depict the 95% confidence interval, the green dashed curves are the borders of the 95% prediction interval and the blue line shows the linear regression line fit.
Figure 3Correlation plot between bone density and age. Bone density (HU) is on the vertical axis, and age (years) is on the horizontal axis. The dark red dashed curves depict the 95% confidence interval, the green dashed curves are the borders of the 95% prediction interval and the blue line shows the linear regression line fit.
Figure 4Correlation plot between ACC and age. ACC (expressed as SUVBW) is on the vertical axis and age (years) is on the horizontal axis. The dark red dashed curves depict the 95% confidence interval, the green dashed curves are the borders of the 95 % prediction interval and the blue line shows the linear regression line fit.
Correlation analyses between the measures of tracer uptake and the CT-based bone density variables
| ACC (kBq/ml) | 0.483 | −0.379 | 0.422* |
| ACC (SUVBW) | 0.678 | −0.385 | 0.586 |
| ACC (SUVLBW) | 0.648 | −0.452 | 0.570 |
| ACC (SUVBSA) | 0.637 | −0.424 | 0.552 |
| HU | | −0.650 | 0.960 |
| LAC | 0.960 | −0.698 |
ACC activity concentration, BSA body surface area, BW body weight, HU Hounsfield unit, LAC linear attenuation coefficient, LBW lean body weight, r, Pearson's correlation coefficient, SUV, standardised uptake value. *Correlation significance for LAC vs. ACC (kBq/ml) was p < 0.001. All the other correlations were p < 0.0001.