K2P (KCNK) potassium channels generate "leak" potassium currents that strongly influence cellular excitability and contribute to pain, somatosensation, anesthesia, and mood. Despite their physiological importance, K2Ps lack specific pharmacology. Addressing this issue has been complicated by the challenges that the leak nature of K2P currents poses for electrophysiology-based high-throughput screening strategies. Here, we present a yeast-based high-throughput screening assay that avoids this problem. Using a simple growth-based functional readout, we screened a library of 106,281 small molecules and identified two new inhibitors and three new activators of the mammalian K2P channel K2P2.1 (KCNK2, TREK-1). By combining biophysical, structure-activity, and mechanistic analysis, we developed a dihydroacridine analogue, ML67-33, that acts as a low micromolar, selective activator of temperature- and mechano-sensitive K2P channels. Biophysical studies show that ML67-33 reversibly increases channel currents by activating the extracellular selectivity filter-based C-type gate that forms the core gating apparatus on which a variety of diverse modulatory inputs converge. The new K2P modulators presented here, together with the yeast-based assay, should enable both mechanistic and physiological studies of K2P activity and facilitate the discovery and development of other K2P small molecule modulators.
K2P (KCNK) potassium channels generate "leak" potassium currents that strongly influence cellular excitability and contribute to pain, somatosensation, anesthesia, and mood. Despite their physiological importance, K2Ps lack specific pharmacology. Addressing this issue has been complicated by the challenges that the leak nature of K2P currents poses for electrophysiology-based high-throughput screening strategies. Here, we present a yeast-based high-throughput screening assay that avoids this problem. Using a simple growth-based functional readout, we screened a library of 106,281 small molecules and identified two new inhibitors and three new activators of the mammalianK2P channel K2P2.1 (KCNK2, TREK-1). By combining biophysical, structure-activity, and mechanistic analysis, we developed a dihydroacridine analogue, ML67-33, that acts as a low micromolar, selective activator of temperature- and mechano-sensitive K2P channels. Biophysical studies show that ML67-33 reversibly increases channel currents by activating the extracellular selectivity filter-based C-type gate that forms the core gating apparatus on which a variety of diverse modulatory inputs converge. The new K2P modulators presented here, together with the yeast-based assay, should enable both mechanistic and physiological studies of K2P activity and facilitate the discovery and development of other K2P small molecule modulators.
K2P channels regulate electrical
activity in various
tissues through generation of a plasma membrane “leak”
potassium conductance.[1,2] Channels from this family function
in excitable and nonexcitable cells and are implicated in vasodilation,
respiratory control, nociception, neuroprotection, anesthesia, and
antidepressant responses.[1−3] Due to their involvement in pain,
ischemia, and migraine, K2Ps are proposed as targets for
a range of cardiovascular and neurological disorders;[3] however, despite this considerable interest, the K2P family is poorly responsive to classic potassium channel
blockers[4] and remains practically pharmacologically
orphaned.[2,3] Development of specific K2P pharmacology
has been hindered by the scarcity of facile methods to detectpotassium
flux in cells and by the fact that the channels produce a voltage-independent
“leak” current that is a challenge for conventional
electrophysiological screening assays. Thus, there is a need to develop
new screening strategies for identifying K2P modulators.Here, we report the development and implementation of a high-throughput
yeast-based screening assay for small molecule modulators of the polymodal
K2P, K2P2.1 (KCNK2, TREK-1).[5−7] This channel is regulated by heat,[8] mechanical
force,[9] general anesthetics,[9,10] and G-protein coupled receptors[6] and
is involved in pain,[11,12] general anesthetic responses,[13] neuroprotection from ischemia,[13] and depression.[14] Although a
variety of pharmacologic agents affectK2P2.1 (TREK-1)
function, such as millimolar concentrations of volatile halogenated[4,9,10,15,16] and gaseous general anesthetics,[4,15,17] the neuroprotective agent riluzole
(10–100 μM),[4,18] and the antidepressant
fluoxetine (Prozac) (IC50 ∼10 μM),[4,19,20] these compounds have other molecular
targets.[15] Hence, we set out to develop
small molecules that could control K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activity
selectively. Such molecules should serve as tools to dissect the unconventional
gating apparatus that controls K2P2.1 (TREK-1) function[21−23] and may also provide lead compounds for novel anesthetics, neuroprotectants,
and drugs against mood disorders.Using a yeast-based screen,
coupled with electrophysiological analysis,
we discovered K2P2.1 (TREK-1) inhibitors and activators
in a single 106,281 small molecule screening campaign. These modulators
comprise different chemical classes and reversibly affectK2P2.1 (TREK-1). Beginning with a carbazole-based scaffold present in
the activator ML67, we developed ML67-33, an activator that rapidly
and reversibly affects K2P2.1 (TREK-1) with an EC50 in the low micromolar range and by acting on the extracellular C-type
gate though a novel mechanism. This dihydroacridine analogue also
activates the two temperature- and mechano-sensitive K2P channels most closely related to K2P2.1 (TREK-1), K2P10.1 (TREK-2), and K2P4.1 (TRAAK) but has no effects
on more distantly related K2Ps. Thus, ML67-33 represents
a novel K2P activator that has specificity within the K2P family. Our success with this yeast-based assay establishes
a new means for discovering K2P small molecule modulators.
Results
and Discussion
High-Throughput Yeast Screen Identifies K2P2.1 (TREK-1)
Activators and Inhibitors
We desired to address the dearth
of K2P channel pharmacology by developing a high-throughput
screen (HTS) for small molecule K2P modulators. Prior studies
have established that growth of the potassium-uptake-deficient yeast
strain SGY1528[24] could be rescued in solid-media
assays by ectopic expression of diverse potassium channels,[25−27] including K2P2.1 (TREK-1).[22] Although this platform has been used to screen libraries of <10,000
compounds against the inward rectifier Kir2.1[28,29] and has proven advantageous for studying blocker interactions with
potassium channels,[27,30] the solid media format limits
the scalability for screening large libraries of compounds. Hence,
we focused on developing a means to monitor rescue of growth under
limiting potassium concentrations by heterologously expressed potassium
channels, such as K2P2.1 (TREK-1), in a liquid media HTS
format.We measured the signal generated by the vital dye resazurin
(Alamar Blue), which live cells convert to a fluorescent form,[31] to quantify the abundance of living SGY1528
grown in liquid culture in 386-well plates for 24 h in media containing
a range of potassium concentrations (Figure 1). When cultured in media containing 0–50 mM KCl, cells expressing
the yeastpotassium transporter Trk1p[32] exhibited similar levels of resazurin fluorescence signals indicative
of robust growth (fluorescence intensity range: 116 ± 3.2–110
± 3.3, arbitrary units, AU, mean ± SE; p = 0.18, t test, Figure 1A). In contrast, yeast bearing a plasmid for a nonfunctional channel[26] showed little growth in potassium-limited conditions,
0–2 mM KCl (30 ± 0.1–32 ± 0.2 AU) and only
propagated with 50 mM KCl (87 ± 1.5 AU, Figure 1A). Yeast expressing K2P2.1 (TREK-1) that were
grown in potassium-limited conditions, 0–2 mM KCl, had resazurin
fluorescence signals that were substantially larger than the negative
control and that indicated rescue by a functional channel (67 ±
0.5 vs 30 ± 0.1 AU, respectively, p < 0.001, t test, Figure 1A). Interestingly,
in nonlimiting 50 mM KCl media, K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-expressing
cells exhibited reduced growth compared to potassium-limited conditions,
1.2 or 2 mM KCl, (84 ± 1.2 AU, p < 0.001
vs 1.2 or 2 mM KCl, t test) that was comparable to
that of the negative control (Figure 1A). This
effect was not observed for Trk1p (Figure 1A) and is reminiscent of prior studies where activation of a heterologously
expressed potassium channel caused yeast growth inhibition.[33] Together, these experiments show that K2P2.1 (TREK-1) supports viability of SGY1528 in liquid media
under potassium-limiting conditions, a result that agrees with solid
media studies.[22] Importantly, this liquid-based,
384-well format was suited to automated plate reader analysis. Hence,
we next sought to define conditions suitable for a HTS screen for
regulators of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activity.
Figure 1
Yeast screen identifies
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) small molecule
modulators. (A) Resazurin (Alamar blue) measurement of potassium concentration
growth effects on SGY1528 yeast expressing the indicated constructs.
Error bars show ± SE, n = 16. For some points,
error bars are smaller than symbols. (B) Exemplar scatter plot showing
growth inhibition score distribution from a 384-well screening plate.
Each point represents end-point normalized resazurin fluorescence.
Error bars show ± SD. (C, D) Dose–response for (C) ML67
and (D) ML45 on growth inhibition of yeast expressing K2P2.1 (TREK-1) (black circles) or Trk1p (blue triangles). Compound
structures are shown.
Yeast screen identifies
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) small molecule
modulators. (A) Resazurin (Alamar blue) measurement of potassium concentration
growth effects on SGY1528 yeast expressing the indicated constructs.
Error bars show ± SE, n = 16. For some points,
error bars are smaller than symbols. (B) Exemplar scatter plot showing
growth inhibition score distribution from a 384-well screening plate.
Each point represents end-point normalized resazurin fluorescence.
Error bars show ± SD. (C, D) Dose–response for (C) ML67
and (D) ML45 on growth inhibition of yeast expressing K2P2.1 (TREK-1) (black circles) or Trk1p (blue triangles). Compound
structures are shown.Resazurin assessment of the effects of 1% dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO),
the test compound carrier, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, a
growth inhibition control, established two important assay properties.
First, DMSO did not inhibit growth of K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-expressing
yeast in potassium-limiting conditions (2 mM KCl) where the active
channel is required for survival, whereas SDS was lethal. Second,
measurement of the Z′ value, a widely used
HTS assay metric for determining the separation between negative and
positive controls where Z′ > 0.5 indicates
a robust screen,[34] yielded a favorable
value, Z′ = 0.76 (Figure 1B). Hence, we proceeded with a screening campaign to identify
candidate K2P2.1 (TREK-1) modulators.We screened
a library of 106,281 small molecules at 10 μM
each for their ability to inhibit growth of K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-expressing
yeast (Figure 1B, Supplementary
Figure S1, Supplementary Table S1). Each plate included wells
for 1% DMSO and 0.1% SDS, which served as the respective 0% and 100%
growth inhibition controls for calculating the degree of compound-induced
growth inhibition (Supplementary Figure S1). From the initial screen, we chose 320 compounds for further evaluation
from the set that inhibited growth in the range of 44–92% (a
range representing 1.25–3σ above the mean inhibition
from the screen and including an upper limit chosen to reduce toxic
compound identification, cf. Supplementary Methods). To distinguish generally toxic compounds in this set from those
that caused K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-specific effects, we tested
each of the 320 compounds over a range of 0.4–50 μM in
dose–response screen against yeast expressing K2P2.1 (TREK-1) or Trk1p (Figure 1C,D). These
tests identified 81 compounds having at least a 2-fold difference
in the apparent IC50 required to prevent growth K2P2.1 (TREK-1) versus Trk1p expressing yeast, e.g., ML45 and ML67 (Figure 1C,D). From these K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-specific
compounds, we were able to purchase 61 in quantities sufficient for
electrophysiological analysis.Twenty-five of the 61 candidate
compounds were soluble in aqueous
solution at a concentration range suited for initial electrophysiological
assays (100–750 μM) and were tested by two-electrode
voltage clamp for activity against K2P2.1 (TREK-1) expressed
in Xenopus oocytes. Electrophysiological characterization
identified five compounds that affected K2P2.1 (TREK-1).
Two acted as inhibitors: a pyrimidine (ML45) and a thiophene (ML58)
(Supplementary Figure S2). Three activated
the channel: a thiazolidine (ML12), an amantadine derivative (ML42),
and a carbazole (ML67) (Supplementary Figure S3). Dose–response studies showed that ML45 reversibly inhibited
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) by ∼70% at the highest concentration
tested (IC50 ∼21 μM, Figure 2A,C,E). In contrast, ML67 reversibly activated K2P2.1 (TREK-1), increasing currents by up to ∼11-fold (EC50 213.0 ± 1.2 μM, Figure 2 B,D,E and Table 1). Because K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activators could provide a path to novel anesthetics,
analgesics, and neuroprotectants[3] and because
there were readily available derivatives, we chose to focus on the
activator ML67.
Figure 2
ML45 and ML67 reversibly modulate K2P activity
in Xenopus oocytes. (A, B) Exemplar two-electrode
voltage clamp
I–V curves for application of 100 μM (A) ML45 or (B)
ML67 measured using a −150 to 50 mV ramp from a −80
mV holding potential in 2 mM [K+]o. (C, D) Exemplar
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) responses to 100 μM (C) ML45 or (D)
ML67 measured at 20 mV and 0 mV for ML45 and ML67, respectively. (E)
ML45 and ML67 dose–response for K2P2.1 (TREK-1).
“Cpd” denotes tested compound. Data were normalized
to basal activity and fit with the Hill equation. (F) Dose–responses
measured by two-electrode voltage clamp for ML67 against K2P2.1 (TREK-1), black; K2P10.1 (TREK-2), red; K2P3.1 (TASK-1), green; and Kv7.2 (KCNQ2), blue. Error bars show SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2, where n and N is the number of oocytes or independent
oocyte batches, respectively.
Table 1
Effects of Activator Compounds on
K2P Channels and Mutantsa
channel
compound
EC50 (μM)
Hb
Emax (fold)
K2P2.1
(TREK-1)
ML67
213.0 ± 1.2
2.1 ± 0.6
∼11
ML67-2
ND
na
1.3 ± 0.1 at 500 μM
ML67-13
177.4 ± 1.1
2.2 ± 0.5
∼20
ML67-15
ND
4.7 ± 0.9 at 200 μM
ML67-17
162.2 ± 1.2
2.4 ± 1.1
∼14
ML67-18
124.8 ± 1.2
1.2 ± 0.2
∼18
ML67-29
250.6 ± 2.0
1.9 ± 1.4
∼18
ML67-33
36.3 ± 1.0
3.6 ± 0.4
11.1 ± 0.4
9.7 ± 1.2c
2.3 ± 0.7
11.4 ± 1.1
ML67-137
>40
na
9.2 ± 1.4d
K2P2.1 (TREK-1)
G137I
ML67-33
ND
na
0.9 ± 0.1 at 150 μM
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) W275S
ML67-33
21.8 ± 1.3
1.6 ± 0.7
5.1 ± 0.6
K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-3G
ML67-33
49.4 ± 1.1
2.2 ± 0.4
12.9 ± 1.0
K2P10.1 (TREK-2)
ML67
∼250
1.0 ± 0.4
10.1 ± 1.1 at 500 μM
ML67-33
30.2 ± 1.4
1.6 ± 0.6
11.4 ± 1.8
K2P4.1 (TRAAK)
ML67-33
27.3 ± 1.2
1.8 ± 0.4
14.7 ± 1.1d
K2P9.1 (TASK-3)
ML67-33
ND
na
2.1
± 0.4 at 150 μM
K2P5.1 (TASK-2)
ML67-33
ND
na
1.7 ± 0.3d
K2P3.1 (TASK-1)
ML67
ND
na
1.2 ± 0.0 at 500 μM
ML67-33
ND
na
1.1 ± 0.1d
K2P18.1 (TRESK)
ML67-33
ND
na
0.9 ± 0.1d
Kv7.2 (KCNQ2)
ML67
ND
na
1.8 ± 0.0 at 500 μM
ND = not determined; na = not
applicable.
Cooperativity
coefficient from
the Hill equation.
Measurements
from HEK293 cells.
Value
determined at 100 μM
compound.
ML45 and ML67 reversibly modulate K2P activity
in Xenopus oocytes. (A, B) Exemplar two-electrode
voltage clamp
I–V curves for application of 100 μM (A) ML45 or (B)
ML67 measured using a −150 to 50 mV ramp from a −80
mV holding potential in 2 mM [K+]o. (C, D) Exemplar
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) responses to 100 μM (C) ML45 or (D)
ML67 measured at 20 mV and 0 mV for ML45 and ML67, respectively. (E)
ML45 and ML67 dose–response for K2P2.1 (TREK-1).
“Cpd” denotes tested compound. Data were normalized
to basal activity and fit with the Hill equation. (F) Dose–responses
measured by two-electrode voltage clamp for ML67 against K2P2.1 (TREK-1), black; K2P10.1 (TREK-2), red; K2P3.1 (TASK-1), green; and Kv7.2 (KCNQ2), blue. Error bars show SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2, where n and N is the number of oocytes or independent
oocyte batches, respectively.ND = not determined; na = not
applicable.Cooperativity
coefficient from
the Hill equation.Measurements
from HEK293 cells.Value
determined at 100 μM
compound.We first addressed
whether ML67 was a selective or general potassium
channel opener. Two electrode voltage clamp studies showed that ML67
activated the closest K2P2.1 (TREK-1) homologue (Supplementary Figure S4) K2P10.1 (TREK-2)
(EC50 ∼250 μM) but not the more distantly
related K2P3.1 (TASK-1) (Figure 2F). Further, ML67 had no effect on the voltage-gated potassium channel
Kv7.2 (KCNQ2) (Figure 2F) for which small molecule
openers have been described.[35] Having established
that ML67 had some selectivity among diverse potassium channels, we
sought to characterize its structure–activity relationships
with respect to channel activation and improve upon its properties.
ML67 Derivatives Improve Potency for K2P2.1 (TREK-1)
Investigation of substitution on the ML67 central carbazole ring
showed that the hydrophobic halogen atoms were important. Removal
of the chloro substituents at the carbazole ring 3- and 6-positions
abolished activity (ML67-2, Figure 3A, Table 1), whereas the 3,6-dibromo congener ML67-13 showed
a slightly increased potency (EC50 177.4 ± 1.1 μM)
and a dramatically improved maximum response (efficacy) (Emax ∼20 fold) (Figure 3A,
Table 1). Thus, hydrophobic groups at the 3-
and 6-positions are vital for function in the ML67 series.
Figure 3
Studies to
improve ML67 potency. Effects of changes to ML67 (A)
halogen positions, (B) linker region, and (C) acidic group measured
against K2P2.1 (TREK-1) by a −150 to 50 mV ramp
from a −80 mV holding potential using two-electrode voltage
clamp in Xenopus oocytes in 2 mM [K+]o. “Cpd” denotes tested compound. Data (mean
± SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥
2) from 0 mV were normalized to basal activity and fitted to the Hill
equation. EC50 values are ML67-13, 177.4 ± 1.1 μM;
ML67-17, 162.2 ± 1.2 μM; ML67-29, 250.6 ± 2.0 μM
μM; ML67-18, 124.8 ± 1.2 μM; ML67-33, 36.3 ±
1.0 μM. Error bars show SE, n ≥ 6 and N ≥ 2 except for ML67-2 and ML67-15 where n = 4 and N = 2. Compound structures are
shown.
Studies to
improve ML67 potency. Effects of changes to ML67 (A)
halogen positions, (B) linker region, and (C) acidic group measured
against K2P2.1 (TREK-1) by a −150 to 50 mV ramp
from a −80 mV holding potential using two-electrode voltage
clamp in Xenopus oocytes in 2 mM [K+]o. “Cpd” denotes tested compound. Data (mean
± SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥
2) from 0 mV were normalized to basal activity and fitted to the Hill
equation. EC50 values are ML67-13, 177.4 ± 1.1 μM;
ML67-17, 162.2 ± 1.2 μM; ML67-29, 250.6 ± 2.0 μM
μM; ML67-18, 124.8 ± 1.2 μM; ML67-33, 36.3 ±
1.0 μM. Error bars show SE, n ≥ 6 and N ≥ 2 except for ML67-2 and ML67-15 where n = 4 and N = 2. Compound structures are
shown.With regard to the N-alkyl side chain, we found
that the carboxylate function was critical for activity, as the nitrile
congener (ML67-1) (Figure 3B) showed no activity,
even at 500 μM. Extending the alkyl chain by one methylene (ML67-15)
did not improve activity (Figure 3B). Rigidification
of the alkyl chain by a cyclobutane group (ML67-17 and ML67-29, cis:trans stereoisomer ratio 15:85 and
95:5, respectively) had a favorable effect compared to ML67-15: EC50 162.2 ± 1.2 and 250 ± 2 μM for ML67-17 and
ML67-29, respectively (Figure 3B, Table 1). The relative positioning of carbazole ring and
carboxylate function will be quite different in these two stereoisomeric
analogues. Therefore, their similar EC50 values suggest
that precise positioning of the carboxylate is not essential. Consistent
with this notion, replacement of the carboxylate with a bioisosteric
and anionic tetrazole ring (ML67-18) was well tolerated and improved
potency almost 2-fold (EC50 124.8 ± 1.2, Emax ∼18-fold, Figure 3C,
Table 1). Having established the importance
of the halogen substituents and anionic tetrazole, we turned to modification
of the core tricyclic ring system.We explored a number of halogenated
tricyclic ring systems bearing
anionic side chains. These yielded varying degrees of success at improving
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activation. The most effective had substitution
of the carbazole tricycle for 9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine. Analogue
ML67-33 exhibited a 5-fold improved potency compared to that of ML67-18,
but somewhat reduced efficacy (EC50 36.3 ± 1.0 μM, Emax 11.1 ± 0.4 fold, Figure 3C, Table 1). The corresponding dibromo
congener ML67-137 was no more potent than ML67-18 (Figure 3C, Table 1). As ML67-33 (2,7-dichloro-9,9-dimethyl-10-[2-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-ethyl]-9,10-dihydro-acridine) was the most
potent compound and had favorable solubility properties (clog P = 4.84, clog D = 3.29 at pH 7.4, Supplementary Table S2), we pursued a series
of experiments designed to test its mechanism of action.
ML67-33 Activates
the K2P2.1 (TREK-1) C-Type Gate
We examined how
ML67-33 affected K2P2.1 (TREK-1) expressed
in two widely used experimental systems, Xenopus oocytes
and mammalianHEK-293T cells. ML67-33 had similar potencies and efficacies
on K2P2.1 (TREK-1) expressed in both systems (Figure 4A and B) (EC50 36.3 ± 1.1 μM
and 9.7 ± 1.2 μM and Emax 11.1
± 0.4 and 11.4 ± 1.1 for oocytes and HEK cells, respectively,
Figure 4C, Table 1),
demonstrating that the compound acts independently of cellular context
(Figure 4A–C). Further, the effects
of ML-67-33 were fast, occurring within seconds (half-maximal activation
time, 4.1 ± 0.5 s, mean ± SE, n = 7, N = 2) and were reversible (Figure 4D). ML67-33 application to excised membrane patched from HEK cells
expressing K2P2.1 (TREK-1) showed that ML67-33 activated
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) in both the outside-out (Figure 5A) and inside-out (Figure 5B) configurations. The effectiveness in both contexts strongly suggests
that ML67-33 acts directly on the channel and does not require soluble
cytosolic factors. The times of half-maximal activation and return
to baseline following compound washout (t1/2act and t1/2wash, respectively) in the outside-out
configuration were indistinguishable from those measured in the whole-cell
configuration (t1/2act: t1/2wash mean ± SE, 4.1 ± 0.5 s: 3.9 ± 0.5
s and 4.6 ± 0.9 s,: 3.1 ± 0.7 s for whole-cell and outside-out,
respectively, Figure 5C and D). Both t1/2 values slowed substantially when the compound
was applied to the inside-out configuration. Notably, there was a
larger effect on washout from inside-out patches (t1/2act: t1/2wash, 10.8 ±
1.3 s: 22.0 ± 5.1 s, Figure 5C and D).
Taken together, these data indicate that although ML67-33 appears
to be membrane-permeable, its site of action on K2P2.1
(TREK-1) is more readily accessible from the extracellular side.
Figure 4
ML67-33
reversibly activates K2P2.1 (TREK-1) independent
of expression system. (A, B) Exemplar I–V curves showing the
effect of ML67-33 on K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activity in (A) Xenopus oocytes (two-electrode voltage clamp) or (B) HEK-293T
cells (whole cell patch clamp). In both, the external solution contained
2 mM [K+]o, pH 7.4. Currents were elicited by
a −150 to 50 mV voltage ramp from a −80 mV (oocytes)
or −40 mV (HEK-293T) holding potential. (C) Quantification
of the effect of ML67-33 on the indicated channels. Data (mean ±
SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2)
were normalized to basal channel activity and fit with the Hill equation.
EC50 36.3 ± 1.0 μM, 9.7 ± 1.2 μM
and Emax at 100 μM 11.1 ± 0.4,
11.4 ± 1.1 for oocytes and HEK cells, respectively. (D) Exemplar
reversible activation of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) by ML67-33 measured
at 0 mV in HEK-293T cells.
Figure 5
ML67-33 activates K2P2.1 (TREK-1) in excised membrane
patches. (A, B) Exemplar I–V curves showing ML67-33 effects
on K2P2.1 (TREK-1) in (A) outside-out and (B) inside-out
excised patches from HEK-293T cells. Currents were elicited by a −100
to 50 mV ramp from a −40 mV holding potential. (C) Exemplar
responses to ML67-33 measured at 0 mV in the indicated configurations.
Gray indicates presence of 20 μM ML67-33. (D) Time to half-maximal
activation following ML67-33 application and recovery from activation
(wash) following ML67-33 removal, measured in HEK-293T cells at 0
mV. Error bars: mean ± SE n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2. ** p ≤ 0.01; N.S.
indicates not significant (p ≥ 0.05) as determined
by t test.
ML67-33
reversibly activates K2P2.1 (TREK-1) independent
of expression system. (A, B) Exemplar I–V curves showing the
effect of ML67-33 on K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activity in (A) Xenopus oocytes (two-electrode voltage clamp) or (B) HEK-293T
cells (whole cell patch clamp). In both, the external solution contained
2 mM [K+]o, pH 7.4. Currents were elicited by
a −150 to 50 mV voltage ramp from a −80 mV (oocytes)
or −40 mV (HEK-293T) holding potential. (C) Quantification
of the effect of ML67-33 on the indicated channels. Data (mean ±
SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2)
were normalized to basal channel activity and fit with the Hill equation.
EC50 36.3 ± 1.0 μM, 9.7 ± 1.2 μM
and Emax at 100 μM 11.1 ± 0.4,
11.4 ± 1.1 for oocytes and HEK cells, respectively. (D) Exemplar
reversible activation of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) by ML67-33 measured
at 0 mV in HEK-293T cells.ML67-33 activates K2P2.1 (TREK-1) in excised membrane
patches. (A, B) Exemplar I–V curves showing ML67-33 effects
on K2P2.1 (TREK-1) in (A) outside-out and (B) inside-out
excised patches from HEK-293T cells. Currents were elicited by a −100
to 50 mV ramp from a −40 mV holding potential. (C) Exemplar
responses to ML67-33 measured at 0 mV in the indicated configurations.
Gray indicates presence of 20 μM ML67-33. (D) Time to half-maximal
activation following ML67-33 application and recovery from activation
(wash) following ML67-33 removal, measured in HEK-293T cells at 0
mV. Error bars: mean ± SE n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2. ** p ≤ 0.01; N.S.
indicates not significant (p ≥ 0.05) as determined
by t test.A selectivity filter-based C-type-like gate mediates K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activation from diverse inputs that include
basic extracellular
pH,[22,36] intracellular acidosis,[23] temperature,[22] mechanical force,[22] and intracellular C-terminal domain, Ct, phosphorylation.[21] The C-type gate active conformation can be stabilized
by high concentrations of extracellular potassium, [K+]o,[21−23,36] or by mutations in
the P1 pore helix, G137I,[21] or the M4 transmembrane
helix, W275S[22] (Figure 6A). We tested how each affected the response to ML67-33. The
data show that all three manipulations reduced the response of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) to ML67-33 (Figure 6B–G).
Indeed, the change causing the most potent C-type gate stabilization,
G137I,[21] made the channels completely resistant
to ML67-33 activation. In contrast, use of a triple glycine mutation,
K2P2.1-3G[21] (Figure 6A) that uncouples the pore from Ct, which acts as
a sensor for temperature[8,21,22] and mechanical stimulation,[9,22] resulted in channels
that could be readily activated by ML67-33. In this case, both the
ML67-33 potency and efficacy were similar to that of wild-type channels
(EC50 49.4 ± 0.1 μM, Emax12.9 ± 1.0, Figure 6F and G).
The observation that activation of the C-type gate renders the channels
resistant to ML67-33 whereas loss of coupling to Ct does not affectML67-33 activation indicates that ML67-33 acts directly on the components
comprising the C-type gate. Ct is central to K2P2.1 (TREK-1)
activation by the two most effective activators previously reported,
chloroform[4,9] and arachidonic acid,[4,9] and
is crucial for channel inhibition by fluoxetine (Prozac).[20] The lack of involvement of Ct in ML67-33 activation
together with evidence for the direct action of ML67-33 on the C-type
gate indicates that ML67-33 activates the channel by a novel mechanism
(Figure 6H).
Figure 6
ML67-33 activates the K2P2.1
(TREK-1) extracellular
C-type gate. (A) K2P2.1 (TREK-1) subunit cartoon diagram.
Key residue positions, transmembrane segments (M1–M4), and
pore helices (P1 and P2) are indicated. First and second pore-forming
regions are tan and blue, respectively. (B–G) Exemplar two-electrode
voltage clamp I–V curves in Xenopus oocytes
and dose response curves showing ML67-33 responses in channels having
perturbed gating elements. (B) C-type gate stabilization by 90 mM
[K+]o. (C) ML67-33 dose response at +40 and
−40 mV in 90 mM [K+]o (90K) and 0 mV
in 2 mM [K+]o (2K). (D, E) C-type gate stabilization
by (D) G137I and (E) W275S. (F) Uncoupling Ct from the pore by the
K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-3G mutant. (G) ML67-33 dose responses for
the indicated channels at +40 mV (90K) or 0 mV (2K), normalized to
basal channel activity and fit with the Hill equation. Error bars
indicate SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥
2. (H) Model of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activation after ref (21). Green spheres indicate
potassium ions. Positions of Gly137 and Trp275 are indicated. Orange
arrows indicate pathway for coupling Ct activation to the C-type gate.
Elements involved in activation by ML67-33, chloroform,[9] and arachidonic acid[9] are indicated. I–V curves were measured in (B) 90 mM [K+]o or (D–F) 2 mM [K+]o. Currents were elicited by a −100 to 50 mV ramp from a 0
mV holding potential (90K) or by a −150 to 50 mV ramp, from
a −80 mV holding potential (2K).
ML67-33 activates the K2P2.1
(TREK-1) extracellular
C-type gate. (A) K2P2.1 (TREK-1) subunit cartoon diagram.
Key residue positions, transmembrane segments (M1–M4), and
pore helices (P1 and P2) are indicated. First and second pore-forming
regions are tan and blue, respectively. (B–G) Exemplar two-electrode
voltage clamp I–V curves in Xenopus oocytes
and dose response curves showing ML67-33 responses in channels having
perturbed gating elements. (B) C-type gate stabilization by 90 mM
[K+]o. (C) ML67-33 dose response at +40 and
−40 mV in 90 mM [K+]o (90K) and 0 mV
in 2 mM [K+]o (2K). (D, E) C-type gate stabilization
by (D) G137I and (E) W275S. (F) Uncoupling Ct from the pore by the
K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-3G mutant. (G) ML67-33 dose responses for
the indicated channels at +40 mV (90K) or 0 mV (2K), normalized to
basal channel activity and fit with the Hill equation. Error bars
indicate SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥
2. (H) Model of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activation after ref (21). Green spheres indicate
potassium ions. Positions of Gly137 and Trp275 are indicated. Orange
arrows indicate pathway for coupling Ct activation to the C-type gate.
Elements involved in activation by ML67-33, chloroform,[9] and arachidonic acid[9] are indicated. I–V curves were measured in (B) 90 mM [K+]o or (D–F) 2 mM [K+]o. Currents were elicited by a −100 to 50 mV ramp from a 0
mV holding potential (90K) or by a −150 to 50 mV ramp, from
a −80 mV holding potential (2K).
ML67-33 Activates Temperature- and Mechano-Sensitive K2P Channels
To examine the ML67-33 specificity within the
K2P family, we used heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes of representatives from different K2P subtypes[6] (Supplementary Figure S4). These included the two temperature-
and mechano-sensitive K2Ps most closely related to K2P2.1 (TREK-1), K2P10.1 (TREK-2) and K2P4.1 (TRAAK); a representative from the neighboring subgroup, the TALK subgroup, K2P5.1 (TASK-2); and representatives
from two divergent branches of the K2P family, the TASK subgroup, K2P3.1 (TASK-1) and K2P9.1 (TASK-3); and K2P18.1 (TRESK). ML67-33 exhibited substantial
activation of K2P10.1 (TREK-2) (Figure 7A, Supplementary Figure S5A) (EC50 30.2 ± 1.4, Emax 11.4 ±
1.8 fold, Table 1) and K2P4.1 (TRAAK)
(Figure 7B, Supplementary
Figure S5B) (EC50 27.3 ± 1.18 μM, Emax 14.7 ± 1.12 fold, Table 1). In stark contrast, ML67-33 showed little or no activity
against channels from the TALK group, K2P5.1 (TASK-2) (Figure 7C and G, Table 1); TASK group, K2P3.1
(TASK-1) (Figure 7D and G, Table 1) and K2P9.1 (TASK-3) (Figure 7E and G, Table 1); and K2P18.1 (TRESK) (Figure 7F and G, Table 1) even when applied at 100 μM, a concentration
at which K2P2.1 (TREK-1) shows a maximal response. Similar
to the parent compound ML67 (Figure 2F), ML67-33
at 100 μM showed no effect on Kv7.2 (KCNQ2) (Supplementary Figure S6). Together, these data establish that
ML67-33 is a selective activator of channels from the K2P2.1 (TREK-1) subfamily of temperature- and mechano-sensitive channels.
Figure 7
ML67-33
is a selective activator of temperature- and mechanosensitive
K2P channels. (A–F) Exemplar I–V curves showing
ML67-33 effects on (A) K2P10.1 (TREK-2), (B) K2P4.1 (TRAAK), (C) K2P5.1 (TASK-2), (D) K2P3.1
(TASK-1), (E) K2P9.1 (TASK-3), and (F) K2P18.1
(TRESK) measured in Xenopus oocytes using a −150
to 50 mV ramp from a −80 mV holding potential in 2 mM [K+]o. (G) ML67-33 dose responses for the indicated
channels. Data (mean ± SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2) were normalized to basal activity and fit
with the Hill equation. EC50 values: K2P2.1
(TREK-1) 36.3 ± 1.0 μM, K2P10.1 (TREK-2) 30.2
± 1.4 μM, and K2P4.1 (TRAAK) 27.3 ± 1.2
μM. Emax values at 100 μM
are K2P2.1 (TREK-1) 11.1 ± 0.4, K2P10.1
(TREK-2) 11.4 ± 1.8, K2P4.1 (TRAAK) 14.7 ± 1.1,
K2P5.1 (TASK-2) 2.0 ± 0.1, K2P9.1 (TASK-3)
1.7 ± 0.3, K2P3.1 (TASK-1) 1.1 ± 0.0, K2P18.1 (TRESK) 0.9 ± 0.1. Error bars indicate SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2.
ML67-33
is a selective activator of temperature- and mechanosensitive
K2P channels. (A–F) Exemplar I–V curves showing
ML67-33 effects on (A) K2P10.1 (TREK-2), (B) K2P4.1 (TRAAK), (C) K2P5.1 (TASK-2), (D) K2P3.1
(TASK-1), (E) K2P9.1 (TASK-3), and (F) K2P18.1
(TRESK) measured in Xenopus oocytes using a −150
to 50 mV ramp from a −80 mV holding potential in 2 mM [K+]o. (G) ML67-33 dose responses for the indicated
channels. Data (mean ± SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2) were normalized to basal activity and fit
with the Hill equation. EC50 values: K2P2.1
(TREK-1) 36.3 ± 1.0 μM, K2P10.1 (TREK-2) 30.2
± 1.4 μM, and K2P4.1 (TRAAK) 27.3 ± 1.2
μM. Emax values at 100 μM
are K2P2.1 (TREK-1) 11.1 ± 0.4, K2P10.1
(TREK-2) 11.4 ± 1.8, K2P4.1 (TRAAK) 14.7 ± 1.1,
K2P5.1 (TASK-2) 2.0 ± 0.1, K2P9.1 (TASK-3)
1.7 ± 0.3, K2P3.1 (TASK-1) 1.1 ± 0.0, K2P18.1 (TRESK) 0.9 ± 0.1. Error bars indicate SE, n ≥ 6, N ≥ 2.
Discussion
K2P channels are the most diverse
potassium channel class[37] and function
in both excitable and nonexcitable cells.[1] The fact that this channel family responds poorly to classic potassium
channel blockers[4] and remains largely pharmacologically
orphaned[3,4] limits the ability to probe its function.
Additionally, because K2Ps produce voltage-independent
leak current, they present difficult targets for modulator discovery
by conventional electrophysiological screening techniques. Our studies
demonstrate that it is possible to use a solution-based yeast screening
platform built upon rescue of potassium uptake by a functional K2P channel to identify both inhibitors and activators of K2Ps. This assay provides a substantial advantage in terms of
scalability and quantification over solid-based media assays used
previously to screen small libraries against other potassium channels.[28,29]We identified a set of novel K2P2.1 (TREK-1) inhibitors
and activators in a single screening campaign covering 106,281 compounds.
Because all of the identified compounds inhibited K2P2.1
(TREK-1)-dependent yeast growth, our discovery of molecules that proved
to be activators was unexpected. Examination of the potassium dependency
of yeast rescue in solution showed that, unlike the potassium transporter
Trk1p, K2P2.1 (TREK-1) conferred a bell-shaped dependence
on growth rescue as a function of potassium (Figure 1A), an effect not seen previously in solid media assays.[22] Prior identification of gain-of-function mutants
of the yeast channel YKC1 (TOK1) has shown that hyperactive potassium
channels can negatively impactyeast growth.[33] Although the exact mechanism by which K2P2.1 (TREK-1)
hyper-activation causes growth inhibition remains unclear, the results
from the YKC1 (TOK1) studies suggest a rationale for why our high-throughput
screen identified inhibitors and activators of K2P2.1 (TREK-1)
in a single screening campaign. Because inhibitors and activators
of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) are desirable for both physiological
studies and as leads for therapeutic applications,[3] this unexpected benefit substantially expands the potential
of this assay to identify K2P modulators from diverse chemical
libraries.The two inhibitors and three activators that we identified
produced
fast, reversible changes in K2P2.1 (TREK-1) function that
occurred within seconds of compound application and removal (Supplementary Figures S2 and S3). This is notable
because the yeast HTS assay time scale is hours and could favor the
identification of slow-acting compounds that have indirect effects
on channel function by affecting factors such as channel biogenesis,
assembly, or trafficking. Although such compounds could in principle
be identified, the fact that we found diverse compounds that appear
to act directly and immediately on the channel indicates that there
is no strong bias for slow-acting effectors and underscores the potential
of this assay as a discovery platform for fast-acting K2P channel modulators.By combining biophysical characterization
and chemical synthesis,
we improved upon the properties of a lead activator, ML67 (Figure 3, Table 1), to create a dihydroacridine
derivative that reversibly activated K2P2.1 (TREK-1) (Figure 4) with an EC50 in the low-micromolar
range and an Emax of ∼11 (Table 1). The observation that ML67-33 activates K2P2.1 (TREK-1) in excised membrane patches (Figure 5) demonstrates that the compound does not act by
perturbing channel trafficking or via a mechanism that involves cytosolic
proteins and suggests that ML67-33 acts directly on the channel.Diverse gating signals that include protons, temperature, mechanical
force, and phosphorylation control K2P2.1 (TREK-1) function.
Although many of these are sensed by the intracellular cytoplasmic
domain, Ct,[8,21,38−40] their actions converge on a common C-type selectivity
filter-based gate located on the extracellular side of the membrane.[21−23,36,41] A variety of manipulations that stabilize this C-type gate, such
as high concentrations of extracellular potassium[36] and mutations in two elements central to C-type gate activation,
the P1 pore helix and M4 transmembrane helix,[22] reduced or eliminated the activating effects of ML67-33 (Figure 6B–E and G). By contrast, decoupling Ct from
the C-type gate failed to affect channel sensitivity to ML67-33 (Figure 6F and G). This result eliminates this region as
the target of ML67-33 action and is striking because in addition to
sensing physiological inputs, Ct is thought to be central to K2P2.1 (TREK-1) modulation by compounds such as chloroform,[9] arachidonic acid,[9] and fluoxetine (Prozac).[20] Further, we
found that ML67-33 acts quickly and reversibly when applied to channels
in whole cells and outside-out patches but displays slower on and
off rates when applied to channels in the inside-out patch configuration
(Figure 5C and D). Together, these observations
strongly support the idea that ML67-33 acts directly on the extracellular
C-type gate and indicate that ML67-33 has a mechanism that is different
from other K2P2.1 (TREK-1) modulators and that targets
the core machinery that controls channel gating (Figure 6H).ML67-33 activates two, closely related temperature-
and mechano-sensitive
K2P channels, K2P10.1 (TREK-2) and K2P4.1 (TRAAK), with an EC50 in the low-micromolar range
(Figure 7, Table 1).
In contrast, ML67-33 was ineffective against more the distantly related
members of the K2P family K2P5.1 (TASK-2), K2P3.1 (TASK-1), K2P9.1 (TASK-3), and K2P18.1 (TRESK) and against the voltage-gated channel Kv7.2 (KCNQ2)
(Figure 7, Supplementary
Figure S6). The C-type, selectivity filter-based gating mechanism
acts in channels that respond to ML67-33, K2P2.1 (TREK-1),[22,23,36] and K2P10.1 (TREK-2),[22] as well as those that were resistant to the
compound, K2P3.1 (TASK-1)[42−44] and K2P5.1
(TASK-2).[45] Thus, the presence of a C-type
gate is necessary but not sufficient for activation by ML67-33. Further,
the selectivity profile of the compound suggests that key targets
of ML67-33 action must lie in elements that are common to the K2P2.1 (TREK-1) subfamily.A number of compounds modulate
K2P2.1 (TREK-1) activity.[4] Many
are drugs having numerous molecular targets
or metabolites involved in multiple pathways such as local[46,47] and general[9,10,17] anesthetics, antidepressants,[9,19] neuroprotectants,[18,48] phospholipids,[38,49] protons,[36,39,50] and heavy metal ions.[17] Most of these K2P2.1 (TREK-1) modulators act
at >100 μM, have limited effects on current amplitude,[4] and current enhancements of <2-fold.[10,17,47,51] The largest reported activations are for chloroform (5.5-fold at
1.6 mM)[9] and arachidonic acid (3–12-fold
at 10–20 μM),[9,47] a polyunsaturated fatty
acid with multiple biological functions. ML67-33 acts at a lower concentration
(9.7–36.3 μM) and has a larger stimulatory effect (Emax ∼11-fold) than most previously reported
activators.[4] Although ML67-33 activation
matches that of the most effective but unspecific activator, arachidonic
acid,[9,47] ML67-33 stimulation of K2P2.1
(TREK-1) does not require Ct (Figure 6F), a
channel element that is central to the action of chloroform,[4,9] arachidonic acid,[4,9] and other gating inputs.[8,21,38−40] Instead, our
data indicate that the potent activation caused by ML67-33 involves
direct action on the C-type gate that forms the core gating apparatus
of the channel[21−23,41] (Figure 6H). These properties, together with the fact that ML67-33
acts within seconds, suggest that ML67-33 has a novel mechanism of
action and focuses attention on the C-type gate for future structure-based
development of K2P modulators.ML67-33 displays marked
specificity within the K2P group
and thus should provide a key step in the development of selective
regulators of the K2P2.1 (TREK-1) subfamily. Such compounds
may afford new entry points for neuroprotective and cardioprotective
molecules that could be useful for the treatment of ischemia or pain
control. Finally, the demonstrated ability of our high-throughput
yeast-based screening assay to identify both activators and inhibitors
of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) suggests that this platform can be adapted
to screen for regulators of other K2Ps. Our findings should
enable new mechanistic and physiological investigations of K2P activity as well as the further discovery of other K2P small molecule modulators.
Methods
Molecular
Biology
Murine K2P channels were
cloned into pGEMHE/pMO,[22] IRES-GFP (Invitrogen),
or pYES2-MET25 (high copy 2 μ, URA3)[26] for expression in oocytes, HEK-293T cells, and
yeast, respectively, using standard molecular biology procedures,
and verified by DNA sequencing.
Yeast, Media, Compounds,
and High-Throughput Screening
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain SGY1528 was transformed
with previously described plasmids.[22,26] Resazurin
(Alamar Blue, Invitrogen) signals were quantified using an automated
plate reader using 560 nm excitation/590 nm emission settings. Details
are found in the Supporting Information.Library compounds were assembled at the Small Molecule Discovery
Center from commercial sources. Individual compounds were purchased
or synthesized.
Electrophysiology
Two electrode
voltage clamp was done
as previously described.[21,22] HEK293T whole cell
and patch clamp recording was done following established protocols.[9] Data were fit with a modified Hill equation: I = Imin + (Imax – Imin)/(1 + 10(Log EC); Imax and Imin are
maximal and minimal current values, respectively, EC50 is
a half-maximal effective concentration, and H is
the Hill coefficient. Detailed procedures are found in the Supporting Information.
Statistical Analysis
Results are mean ± SD or
SEM from at least two independent experiments (denoted as N). Statistical analyses used the two-tailed Student’s t test; significance defined as p ≤
0.05.
Chemical Synthesis
ML67, ML67-2, and ML67-13 were obtained
from commercial sources. Syntheses of ML67-33, ML67-137, ML67-18,
ML67-15, ML67-17, and ML67-29 are described in Supporting Information.
Authors: Coeli M B Lopes; Tibor Rohács; Gábor Czirják; Tamás Balla; Péter Enyedi; Diomedes E Logothetis Journal: J Physiol Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Svetlana Tertyshnikova; Ronald J Knox; Mary Jane Plym; George Thalody; Corinne Griffin; Torben Neelands; David G Harden; Laura Signor; David Weaver; Robert A Myers; Nicholas J Lodge Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2004-12-17 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Abdelkrim Alloui; Katharina Zimmermann; Julien Mamet; Fabrice Duprat; Jacques Noël; Jean Chemin; Nicolas Guy; Nicolas Blondeau; Nicolas Voilley; Catherine Rubat-Coudert; Marc Borsotto; Georges Romey; Catherine Heurteaux; Peter Reeh; Alain Eschalier; Michel Lazdunski Journal: EMBO J Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Scott J Barraza; Philip C Delekta; Janice A Sindac; Craig J Dobry; Jianming Xiang; Richard F Keep; David J Miller; Scott D Larsen Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 3.641