Literature DB >> 32533538

Tailored Messages About Research Participation: Using an Interactive Information Aid to Improve Study Recruitment.

Susan E Morgan1, Wei Peng2, Aurora Occa3, Bingjing Mao2, Soroya McFarlane4, Gilles Grinfeder5, Barbara Millet5, Margaret M Byrne6.   

Abstract

After a diagnosis of cancer (or other serious disease), patients may be asked to consider joining a clinical trial. Because most people are unfamiliar with the scientific concepts that are necessary to the provision of meaningful informed consent, patient education is necessary. Increasing knowledge alone is not sufficient; understanding how clinical trial participation aligns with personal circumstances and knowledge is central to the decision-making process. In this study, 302 cancer patients and survivors evaluated an interactive information aid (IA) designed to inform their decision to join a research study or clinical trial by providing tailored information to patients' responses to questions pertaining to seven key barriers or facilitators of clinical trial participation. The development of the IA was done with input from the authors' Clinical Translational Science Institute; linked components of the IA were vetted by members and leaders of the institution's NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. Results of the study indicated that the information aid was successful in significantly reducing fears and increasing knowledge, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intentions about research participation relative to a control condition. Thus, an interactive information aid that provides information that is responsive to patients' values, knowledge, and personal circumstances can help patients to be better prepared to consider a decision about research participation.
© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer communication; Clinical trials; Information aids

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32533538     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   1.771


  9 in total

1.  Innovating information-delivery for potential clinical trials participants. What do patients want from multi-media resources?

Authors:  Catherine Shneerson; Richard Windle; Karen Cox
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-20

Review 2.  A communication model of shared decision making: accounting for cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Mary M Step
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Melissa Constantine; David Magnus; Kathryn M Porter; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Michael Green; Nancy E Kass; Benjamin S Wilfond; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  The relationships among knowledge, self-efficacy, preparedness, decisional conflict, and decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  S M Miller; S V Hudson; B L Egleston; S Manne; J S Buzaglo; K Devarajan; L Fleisher; J Millard; N Solarino; J Trinastic; N J Meropol
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.

Authors:  P Cameron; G R Pond; R Y Xu; P M Ellis; J R Goffin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy.

Authors:  V Jenkins; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Robert G Newcombe; Mary Politi; Marie-Anne Durand; Elizabeth Drake; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Sara Khangura; Anton Saarimaki; Stephanie Sivell; Mareike Stiel; Steven J Bernstein; Nananda Col; Angela Coulter; Karen Eden; Martin Härter; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Nora Moumjid; Dawn Stacey; Richard Thomson; Tim Whelan; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Parents' agendas in paediatric clinical trial recruitment are different from researchers' and often remain unvoiced: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kerry Woolfall; Valerie Shilling; Helen Hickey; Rosalind L Smyth; Emma Sowden; Paula R Williamson; Bridget Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  C Hutchison; C Cowan; T McMahon; J Paul
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Participation in Clinical Trials Among Patients With Lupus.

Authors:  Onengiya Harry; Carl D Langefeld; Lori E Crosby; Avani C Modi
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.902

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.