Literature DB >> 23736252

Supraspinatus tendon and subacromial space parameters measured on ultrasonographic imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome.

Lori A Michener1, Sevgi S Subasi Yesilyaprak, Amee L Seitz, Mark K Timmons, Matthew K Walsworth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the supraspinatus tendon thickness, subacromial space, and the relationship between tendon thickness and subacromial space to further elucidate the mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome.
METHODS: In a single-blind cross-sectional study, subjects were recruited with subacromial impingement syndrome (n = 20) and asymptomatic controls (n = 20) matched for age, gender, and hand dominance. Ultrasound images were collected using a 4-12-MHz linear transducer in B-mode of the supraspinatus tendon in the transverse (short axis) and the anterior aspect of the subacromial space outlet. Using image callipers, measurements of tendon thickness were taken at 3 points along the tendon and averaged for a single thickness measure. The subacromial space outlet was measured via the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) defined by the inferior acromion and superior humeral head. The occupation ratio was calculated as the tendon thickness as a percentage of AHD.
RESULTS: The subacromial impingement syndrome group had a significantly thicker tendon (mean difference = 0.6 mm, p = 0.048) and a greater tendon occupation ratio (mean difference = 7.5 %, p = 0.014) compared to matched controls. There were no AHD group differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The supraspinatus tendon was thicker and occupied a greater percentage of AHD, supporting an intrinsic mechanism. An extrinsic mechanism of tendon compression is theoretically supported, but future imaging studies need to confirm direct compression with elevation. Treatment to reduce tendon thickness may reduce symptoms, and surgical intervention to increase subacromial space may be considered if tendon compression can be verified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23736252     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2542-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of chronic tears of the rotator cuff by ultrasound. A new index.

Authors:  T Wallny; U A Wagner; S Prange; O Schmitt; H Reich
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-07

2.  The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data.

Authors:  J Erik Giphart; Olivier A J van der Meijden; Peter J Millett
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Sonographic versus radiographic measurement of the subacromial space width.

Authors:  R Azzoni; P Cabitza
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun

4.  Supraspinatus tendon US morphology in basketball players: correlation with main pathologic models of secondary impingement syndrome in young overhead athletes. Preliminary report.

Authors:  R Girometti; A De Candia; M Sbuelz; F Toso; C Zuiani; M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  The scapular assistance test results in changes in scapular position and subacromial space but not rotator cuff strength in subacromial impingement.

Authors:  Amee L Seitz; Philip W McClure; Sheryl Finucane; Jessica M Ketchum; Matthew K Walsworth; N Douglas Boardman; Lori A Michener
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity.

Authors:  Brian G Leggin; Lori A Michener; Michael A Shaffer; Susan K Brenneman; Joseph P Iannotti; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Reliability study of the sonographic measurement of the acromiohumeral distance in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  B G Pijls; F P Kok; L I F Penning; N A Guldemond; H J Arens
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.910

8.  Ultrasound measurement of rotator cuff thickness and acromio-humeral distance in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder.

Authors:  Jerzy J Cholewinski; Damian J Kusz; Piotr Wojciechowski; Lukasz S Cielinski; Miroslaw P Zoladz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Matthew K Walsworth; William C Doukas; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Philip W McClure; Andrew R Karduna
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  32 in total

1.  State of the art in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Klaus Bak; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Quantitative and qualitative analyses of subacromial impingement by kinematic open MRI.

Authors:  Atsushi Tasaki; Akimoto Nimura; Taiki Nozaki; Akira Yamakawa; Mamoru Niitsu; Wataru Morita; Yoshimitsu Hoshikawa; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Thickness of the Rotator Cuff Tendons at the Articular Margin: An Anatomic Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  William C Sessions; Rebekah L Lawrence; J Tyler Steubs; Paula M Ludewig; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

5.  The effect of glenohumeral plane of elevation on supraspinatus subacromial proximity.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; William C Sessions; Megan C Jensen; Justin L Staker; Aya Eid; Ryan Breighner; Nathaniel E Helwig; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of clinical trial participant selection criteria.

Authors:  Amy R Watts; Ben Williams; Susan W Kim; Donald C Bramwell; Jeganath Krishnan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-08-20

7.  Development of shoulder pain with job-related repetitive load: mechanisms of tendon pathology and anxiety.

Authors:  Federico Pozzi; Catarina O Sousa; Hillary A Plummer; Brittany Andrade; Daniel Awokuse; Naoko Kono; Wendy J Mack; Shawn C Roll; Lori A Michener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.507

8.  Distribution of bone and tissue morphological properties related to subacromial space geometry in a young, healthy male population.

Authors:  Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley; John M O'Neill; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Comparison of Upper Extremity Physical Characteristics Between Adolescent Competitive Swimmers and Nonoverhead Athletes.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hibberd; Kevin Laudner; David J Berkoff; Kristen L Kucera; Bing Yu; Joseph B Myers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Ultrasound assessment for grading structural tendon changes in supraspinatus tendinopathy: an inter-rater reliability study.

Authors:  Kim Gordon Ingwersen; John Hjarbaek; Henrik Eshoej; Camilla Marie Larsen; Jette Vobbe; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.