BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability and accuracy of sonographic (US) acromiohumeral distance (AHD) measurement for both experienced and novice operators in US in patients suffering from subacromial impingement syndrome. METHOD: A total of 43 patients (50 shoulders) diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome were recruited from an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The US measurement of AHD was obtained consecutively in a neutral position and in a 60 degrees abduction position. A total of 300 blinded measurements were taken. RESULT: In the neutral abduction group the intra- observer interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.94 for the experienced operator and 0.92 for the novice operator. The inter-observer ICC was 0.70 and the accuracy was 1.1 mm. In the 60 degrees abduction group, the intra-observer ICC was 0.90 for the experienced operator and 0.87 for the novice operator. The inter-observer ICC was 0.64 and the accuracy was 1.4 mm. All ICCs were significant at a level of p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: The inaccuracy of the method was 1 mm regardless of the experience of the observer. US AHD measurement in patients with shoulder complaints is not as accurate as reported in healthy subjects. This may have important implications for the clinical use of this parameter. Copyright 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability and accuracy of sonographic (US) acromiohumeral distance (AHD) measurement for both experienced and novice operators in US in patients suffering from subacromial impingement syndrome. METHOD: A total of 43 patients (50 shoulders) diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome were recruited from an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The US measurement of AHD was obtained consecutively in a neutral position and in a 60 degrees abduction position. A total of 300 blinded measurements were taken. RESULT: In the neutral abduction group the intra- observer interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.94 for the experienced operator and 0.92 for the novice operator. The inter-observer ICC was 0.70 and the accuracy was 1.1 mm. In the 60 degrees abduction group, the intra-observer ICC was 0.90 for the experienced operator and 0.87 for the novice operator. The inter-observer ICC was 0.64 and the accuracy was 1.4 mm. All ICCs were significant at a level of p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: The inaccuracy of the method was 1 mm regardless of the experience of the observer. US AHD measurement in patients with shoulder complaints is not as accurate as reported in healthy subjects. This may have important implications for the clinical use of this parameter. Copyright 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Martin Hufeland; Christina Brusis; Hannes Kubo; Jan Grassmann; David Latz; Thilo Patzer Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Lori A Michener; Sevgi S Subasi Yesilyaprak; Amee L Seitz; Mark K Timmons; Matthew K Walsworth Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jennifer A Soo Hoo; Hyungtaek Kim; Julia Fram; Yen-Sheng Lin; Christopher Page; Imaani Easthausen; Prakash Jayabalan Journal: PM R Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 2.218
Authors: S Navarro-Ledesma; F Struyf; M T Labajos-Manzanares; M Fernandez-Sanchez; A Luque-Suarez Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 2.362