Elizabeth E Hibberd1, Kevin Laudner2, David J Berkoff3, Kristen L Kucera4, Bing Yu5, Joseph B Myers4. 1. Department of Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa; 2. School of Kinesiology and Recreation, Illinois State University, Normal; 3. Department of Orthopaedics. 4. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, and. 5. Division of Physical Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Alterations to upper extremity physical characteristics of competitive swimmers (posture, range of motion [ROM], and subacromial-space distance) are commonly attributed to cumulative training load during a swimmer's competitive career. However, this accepted clinical belief has not been established in the literature. It is important to understand whether alterations in posture and associated physical characteristics occur as a result of sport training or factors other than swimming participation to better understand injury risk and possible interventions. OBJECTIVE: To compare posture, subacromial-space distance, and glenohumeral external-rotation, internal-rotation, and horizontal-adduction ROM between adolescent competitive swimmers and nonoverhead athletes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Local swimming pools and high school athletic training rooms. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four competitive adolescent swimmers and 31 nonoverhead athletes who were not currently experiencing any elbow, shoulder, neck, or back pain that limited their sport activity. INTERVENTION(S): Posture, subacromial-space distance, and glenohumeral ROM were measured using photography, diagnostic ultrasound, and a digital inclinometer, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Forward shoulder posture, forward head posture, normalized subacromial-space distance, internal-rotation ROM, and external-rotation ROM. RESULTS: No clinically significant differences existed between swimmers and nonoverhead athletes for posture, normalized subacromial-space distance, or external- or internal-rotation ROM. Swimmers presented with less horizontal-adduction ROM than nonoverhead athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Factors other than swimming participation, such as school and technology use, play important roles in the adaptation of physical characteristics in adolescents. Adolescents, regardless of swimming participation, presented with postural deviations. It is important to consider factors other than swimming participation that contribute to alterations in physical characteristics to understand injury risk and injury-prevention strategies in competitive adolescent swimmers.
CONTEXT: Alterations to upper extremity physical characteristics of competitive swimmers (posture, range of motion [ROM], and subacromial-space distance) are commonly attributed to cumulative training load during a swimmer's competitive career. However, this accepted clinical belief has not been established in the literature. It is important to understand whether alterations in posture and associated physical characteristics occur as a result of sport training or factors other than swimming participation to better understand injury risk and possible interventions. OBJECTIVE: To compare posture, subacromial-space distance, and glenohumeral external-rotation, internal-rotation, and horizontal-adduction ROM between adolescent competitive swimmers and nonoverhead athletes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Local swimming pools and high school athletic training rooms. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four competitive adolescent swimmers and 31 nonoverhead athletes who were not currently experiencing any elbow, shoulder, neck, or back pain that limited their sport activity. INTERVENTION(S): Posture, subacromial-space distance, and glenohumeral ROM were measured using photography, diagnostic ultrasound, and a digital inclinometer, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Forward shoulder posture, forward head posture, normalized subacromial-space distance, internal-rotation ROM, and external-rotation ROM. RESULTS: No clinically significant differences existed between swimmers and nonoverhead athletes for posture, normalized subacromial-space distance, or external- or internal-rotation ROM. Swimmers presented with less horizontal-adduction ROM than nonoverhead athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Factors other than swimming participation, such as school and technology use, play important roles in the adaptation of physical characteristics in adolescents. Adolescents, regardless of swimming participation, presented with postural deviations. It is important to consider factors other than swimming participation that contribute to alterations in physical characteristics to understand injury risk and injury-prevention strategies in competitive adolescent swimmers.
Entities:
Keywords:
posture; range of motion; subacromial space
Authors: Elizabeth E Hibberd; Saki Oyama; Jeffrey T Spang; William Prentice; Joseph B Myers Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Joseph B Myers; Sakiko Oyama; Craig A Wassinger; Robert D Ricci; John P Abt; Kevin M Conley; Scott M Lephart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Charles A Thigpen; Darin A Padua; Lori A Michener; Kevin Guskiewicz; Carol Giuliani; Jay D Keener; Nicholas Stergiou Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Timothy F Tyler; Stephen J Nicholas; Steven J Lee; Michael Mullaney; Malachy P McHugh Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 6.202