Literature DB >> 23733238

Prognosis of normal stress-only gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a single center study.

Maria João Vidigal Ferreira1, Maria João Cunha, Anabela Albuquerque, Ana Paula Moreira, Domingos Ramos, Gracinda Costa, João Lima, Mariano Pego.   

Abstract

It has been advocated that using the stress followed by rest protocol, if the stress images were normal there is no need of rest images, reducing radiation exposure and costs. Our purpose was to assess the prognosis of a group of patients with normal stress-only gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. This was retrospective study that includes 790 patients with normal myocardial stress only perfusion gated SPECT images. Images were considered as normal if a homogeneous myocardial distribution of the tracer was associated with a normal ejection fraction. The mean follow-up was of 42.8 ± 13.3 months. The considered events were death of all causes, myocardial infarction and myocardial revascularization. During this period there were 85 events (10.8 %), including 57 deaths of all causes (67.1 %), 9 myocardial infarctions (10.6 %), 19 revascularizations (2.4 %). In the first year of follow-up there were 32 events (4.0 %) and excluding non cardiac deaths there were 8 events (1.0 %). Using Cox survival analysis, diabetes (HR = 2.2; CI = 1.4-3.4; p ≤ 0.0005), the history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR = 2.1; CI = 1.3-3.2; p ≤ 0.001), age (HR = 1.0; CI = 1.0-1.0; p ≤ 0.05) and type of stress protocol were related with events (exercise test vs. adenosine) (Exercise test: HR = 0.5; CI = 0.3-0.8; p ≤ 0.01). In a multivariate analysis the independent predictors were diabetes, CAD and the type of stress protocol. Based on these results, normal stress-only images are associated with an excellent prognosis even in patients at higher risk, diabetics and patients with known CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733238     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0245-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The evolution of nuclear cardiology takes us back to the beginning to develop today's "new standard of care" for cardiac imaging: how quantifying regional radioactive counts at five and 60 minutes post-stress unmasks hidden ischemia.

Authors:  Richard M Fleming; Gordon M Harrington; Riaz Baqir; Scott Jay; Sridevi Challapalli; Kayla Avery; Jim Green
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2009

3.  Prognostic value of exercise myocardial scintigraphy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions.

Authors:  Alfredo R Galassi; Gerald S Werner; Salvatore D Tomasello; Salvatore Azzarelli; Davide Capodanno; Giombattista Barrano; Francesco Marza'; Luca Costanzo; Mariabarbara Campisano; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarian population.

Authors:  Nili Zafrir; Israel Mats; Alejandro Solodky; Tuvia Ben-Gal; Jaqueline Sulkes; Alexander Battler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Relationship of transient ischemic dilation in dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging and stress-induced changes of functional parameters evaluated by Tl-201 gated SPECT.

Authors:  Guang-Uei Hung; Kung-Wei Lee; Ching-Pei Chen; Wan-Yu Lin; Kuang-Tao Yang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain.

Authors:  Peter B Gibson; Diane Demus; Richard Noto; William Hudson; Lynne L Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Resolution of asymptomatic myocardial ischemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study.

Authors:  Frans J Th Wackers; Deborah A Chyun; Lawrence H Young; Gary V Heller; Ami E Iskandrian; Janice A Davey; Eugene J Barrett; Raymond Taillefer; Steven D Wittlin; Neil Filipchuk; Robert E Ratner; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Clinical value of stress-only Tc-99m SPECT imaging: importance of attenuation correction.

Authors:  Shishir Mathur; Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Richard Ruffin; Arshad Yekta; Deborah Katten; Nitya Alluri; Alan W Ahlberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sequential SPECT/CT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in a large cohort: evaluation of the need for additional imaging and radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elsemiek M Engbers; Jorik R Timmer; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Ad H J Oostdijk; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Time to get on the stress-only bandwagon?

Authors:  Matthew W Parker; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review.

Authors:  B M Pampana Gowd; Gary V Heller; Matthew W Parker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Effect of a patient-specific minimum activity in stress myocardial perfusion imaging using CZT-SPECT: Prognostic value, radiation dose, and scan outcome.

Authors:  J D van Dijk; N M Borren; M Mouden; J A van Dalen; J P Ottervanger; P L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prognosis of stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with prone imaging.

Authors:  Ariel Gutstein; Tamir Bental; Ajejandro Solodky; Israel Mats; Nili Zafrir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Current Practices in Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy in Brazil and Adherence to the IAEA Recommendations: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Carlos Vitor Braga Rodrigues; Anderson Oliveira; Christiane Cigagna Wiefels; Maurício de Souza Leão; Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.