Literature DB >> 23733001

Impact of t(11;14)(q13;q32) on the outcome of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Koji Sasaki1, Gary Lu, Rima M Saliba, Qaiser Bashir, Chitra Hosing, Uday Popat, Nina Shah, Simrit Parmar, Yvonne Dinh, Sairah Ahmed, Elizabeth J Shpall, Partow Kebriaei, Jatin J Shah, Robert Z Orlowski, Richard Champlin, Muzaffar H Qazilbash.   

Abstract

The t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation is seen in 15%-20% patients with multiple myeloma (MM). It generally is not associated with worse outcomes. We studied the impact of t(11;14)(q13;q32) on outcome in patients with MM who received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Eligible patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy followed by auto-HCT at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between February 2000 and August 2010, and had conventional cytogenetic (CC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results available before auto-HCT (n = 993). The cohort was divided into 3 groups of patients: (1) normal (diploid by CC and negative by FISH; n = 869); (2) t(11;14)(q13;q32) by CC or FISH (n = 27); and (3) high-risk (HR) abnormalities by CC or FISH (n = 97). Of the 27 patients with t(11;14)(q13;q32), 18 had isolated t(11;14)(q13;q32) and 9 had concurrent HR abnormalities. The primary objective was to compare outcomes in patients with t(11;14)(q13;q32) and patients with diploid or HR markers detected by CC or FISH studies. The median duration of follow-up in surviving patients was 37 months. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 47% for the normal group, 27% for the t(11;14)(q13;q32) group, and 13% for the HR group (P < .00001). The 3-year OS was 83% for the normal group, 63% for the t(11;14)(q13;q32) group, and 34% for the HR group (P < .00001). On multivariate analysis, t(11;14)(q13;q32) and HR abnormalities by CC or FISH and relapsed disease at auto-HCT were associated with shorter PFS, whereas t(11;14)(q13;q32) and HR abnormalities by CC or FISH, β2 microglobulin of >3.5, and relapsed disease at the time of auto-HCT were associated with shorter OS. In conclusion, patients with t(11;14)(q13;q32) had worse outcomes than patients with normal CC or FISH studies, but better outcomes than patients with HR markers detected by CC or FISH studies.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous transplantation; Cytogenetics; Myeloma; t(11;14)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733001      PMCID: PMC4150684          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  31 in total

1.  The (11;14)(q13;q32) translocation in multiple myeloma. A morphologic and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  J D Hoyer; C A Hanson; R Fonseca; P R Greipp; G W Dewald; P J Kurtin
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p.

Authors:  Kai Neben; Henk M Lokhorst; Anna Jauch; Uta Bertsch; Thomas Hielscher; Bronno van der Holt; Hans Salwender; Igor W Blau; Katja Weisel; Michael Pfreundschuh; Christof Scheid; Ulrich Dührsen; Walter Lindemann; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Norma Peter; Christian Teschendorf; Hans Martin; Mathias Haenel; Hans G Derigs; Marc S Raab; Anthony D Ho; Helgi van de Velde; Dirk Hose; Pieter Sonneveld; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) is the hallmark of IgM, IgE, and nonsecretory multiple myeloma variants.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Richard Garand; Laurence Lodé; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Régis Bataille
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  A randomized phase 2 trial of a preparative regimen of bortezomib, high-dose melphalan, arsenic trioxide, and ascorbic acid.

Authors:  Manish Sharma; Hassan Khan; Peter F Thall; Robert Z Orlowski; Roland L Bassett; Nina Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Simrit Parmar; Michael Wang; Jatin J Shah; Chitra M Hosing; Uday R Popat; Sergio A Giralt; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Multiple myeloma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Myeloma and the t(11;14)(q13;q32); evidence for a biologically defined unique subset of patients.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily A Blood; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Richard J Bailey; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; James D Hoyer; David Harrington; Neil E Kay; Brian Van Ness; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma: a clash of philosophies.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Gösta Gahrton; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Predictive role of interphase cytogenetics for survival of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Königsberg; N Zojer; J Ackermann; E Krömer; H Kittler; E Fritz; H Kaufmann; T Nösslinger; L Riedl; H Gisslinger; U Jäger; I Simonitsch; R Heinz; H Ludwig; H Huber; J Drach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Recurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Thierry Facon; Xavier Leleu; Nadine Morineau; Pauline Huyghe; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Régis Bataille; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  9 in total

1.  Outcome of Patients with Multiple Myeloma and CKS1B Gene Amplification after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Fabian Bock; Gary Lu; Samer A Srour; Sameh Gaballa; Heather Y Lin; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Medhavi Honhar; Maximilian Stich; Nina Das Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Krina Patel; Uday Popat; Chitra Hosing; Martin Korbling; Ruby Delgado; Gabriela Rondon; Jatin J Shah; Sheeba K Thomas; Elisabet E Manasanch; Berend Isermann; Robert Z Orlowski; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Natural history of t(11;14) multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A Lakshman; M Alhaj Moustafa; S V Rajkumar; A Dispenzieri; M A Gertz; F K Buadi; M Q Lacy; D Dingli; A L Fonder; S R Hayman; M A Hobbs; W I Gonsalves; Y L Hwa; P Kapoor; N Leung; R S Go; Y Lin; T V Kourelis; J A Lust; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; R A Kyle; S K Kumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Impact of cytogenetic classification on outcomes following early high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G P Kaufman; M A Gertz; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; D Dingli; S R Hayman; P Kapoor; J A Lust; S Russell; R S Go; Y L Hwa; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar; S K Kumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Multiple myeloma with t(11;14): unique biology and evolving landscape.

Authors:  Susan Bal; Shaji K Kumar; Rafael Fonseca; Francesca Gay; Vania Tm Hungria; Ahmet Dogan; Luciano J Costa
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.942

5.  African Americans with translocation t(11;14) have superior survival after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in comparison with Whites in the United States.

Authors:  Talha Badar; Parameswaran Hari; Omar Dávila; Raphael Fraser; Baldeep Wirk; Binod Dhakal; Cesar O Freytes; Cesar Rodriguez Valdes; Cindy Lee; David H Vesole; Ehsan Malek; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Heather Landau; Hemant S Murthy; Hillard M Lazarus; Jesus G Berdeja; Kenneth R Meehan; Melhem Solh; Miguel Angel Diaz; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Natalie S Callander; Nosha Farhadfar; Qaiser Bashir; Rammurti T Kamble; Ravi Vij; Reinhold Munker; Robert A Kyle; Saurabh Chhabra; Shahrukh Hashmi; Siddhartha Ganguly; Sundar Jagannath; Taiga Nishihori; Yago Nieto; Shaji Kumar; Nina Shah; Anita D'Souza
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Gene Expression Profiling in Multiple Myeloma: Redefining the Paradigm of Risk-Adapted Treatment.

Authors:  Claudio Cerchione; Saad Z Usmani; A Keith Stewart; Martin Kaiser; Leo Rasche; Martin Kortüm; María-Victoria Mateos; Andrew Spencer; Pieter Sonneveld; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Incidence and effect of secondary cardiac amyloidosis on outcomes of patients with t(11;14) multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jinghua Wang; Shuo Yang; Pengjun Liao; Lingji Zeng; Wei Ling; Li Wan; Jianyu Weng; Liye Zhong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Cytogenetic abnormality in patients with multiple myeloma analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Ying Hu; Wenming Chen; Shilun Chen; Zhongxia Huang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  What Multiple Myeloma With t(11;14) Should Be Classified Into in Novel Agent Era: Standard or Intermediate Risk?

Authors:  Wen Gao; Juan Du; Junru Liu; Huixing Zhou; Zhiyao Zhang; Yuan Jian; Guangzhong Yang; Guorong Wang; Ying Tian; Yanchen Li; Yin Wu; Weijun Fu; Juan Li; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.