Literature DB >> 12176874

Recurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

Philippe Moreau1, Thierry Facon, Xavier Leleu, Nadine Morineau, Pauline Huyghe, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Régis Bataille, Hervé Avet-Loiseau.   

Abstract

Recently, we have described the biological correlations associated with the main translocations involving the 14q32 chromosomal region, that is, t(14q32), in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We have now extended the analysis to the prognostic value of these chromosomal rearrangements in 168 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving intensive chemotherapy within clinical trials of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM). Patients with t(4;14) displayed a poor outcome (short event-free survival and short overall survival), whereas those with t(11;14) displayed long survival. On the other hand, patients with neither t(4;14) nor t(11;14) presented an intermediate outcome. Importantly, chromosome 13 abnormalities (C13As) significantly influence the prognosis of this latter group. In contrast, C13As affected the outcome of the other patients to a much lesser extent, either because of an almost constant association (in the t(4;14) group) or because of a lack of any significant prognostic impact (in the t(11;14) group; only one event occurred in the 10 patients with t(11;14) and C13As). Considering that t(4;14) and t(11;14) (1) are the only (so far recognized) true, recurrent t(14q32)'s, (2) are linked to specific immunoglobulin isotypes, and (3) display specific outcomes, they represent distinct entities corresponding to a specific oncogenesis and prognosis. These data emphasized the interest in analyzing these two translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in prospective therapeutic trials in order to consider these translocations as distinct entities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12176874     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  50 in total

1.  NY-ESO-1 is highly expressed in poor-prognosis multiple myeloma and induces spontaneous humoral and cellular immune responses.

Authors:  Frits van Rhee; Susann M Szmania; Fenghuang Zhan; Sushil K Gupta; Mindy Pomtree; Pei Lin; Ramesh B Batchu; Amberly Moreno; Guilio Spagnoli; John Shaughnessy; Guido Tricot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Clinical implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13 in myeloma patients treated with high-dose therapy.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Philip R Greipp; Mark R Litzow; Kimberly J Henderson; Scott A Van Wier; Greg J Ahmann; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Plasma cell myeloma with lymphoplasmacytic morphology and cyclin D1 expression, an uncommon variant.

Authors:  Daniel A Hale; John R Krause
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Microarray-based understanding of normal and malignant plasma cells.

Authors:  John De Vos; Dirk Hose; Thierry Rème; Karin Tarte; Jérôme Moreaux; Karéne Mahtouk; Michel Jourdan; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jean-François Rossi; Friedrich W Cremer; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Lenalidomide maintenance for high-risk multiple myeloma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Alsina; Pamela S Becker; Xiaobo Zhong; Alexia Adams; Parameswaran Hari; Scott Rowley; Edward A Stadtmauer; David H Vesole; Brent Logan; Daniel Weisdorf; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Leslie L Popplewell; Brian McClune; William Bensinger; Marcie Riches; Sergio A Giralt; Marcelo C Pasquini
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  MB4-2 breakpoint in MMSET combined with del(17p) defines a subset of t(4;14) multiple myeloma with very poor prognosis.

Authors:  Anne Lazareth; Xiu-Yi Song; Aurelie Coquin; Stephanie Harel; Lionel Karlin; Karim Belhadj; Damien Roos-Weil; Laurent Frenzel; Jerôme Tamburini; Margaret Macro; Sylvie Chevret; Hervé Avet Loiseau; Stephane Minvielle; Jean Paul Fermand; Jean Soulier; Jean Christophe Bories; Bertrand Arnulf
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.

Authors:  H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  NEK2 induces drug resistance mainly through activation of efflux drug pumps and is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma and other cancers.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Ye Yang; Jiliang Xia; He Wang; Mohamed E Salama; Wei Xiong; Hongwei Xu; Shashirekha Shetty; Tiehua Chen; Zhaoyang Zeng; Lei Shi; Maurizio Zangari; Rodney Miles; David Bearss; Guido Tricot; Fenghuang Zhan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Multistep tumorigenesis of multiple myeloma: its molecular delineation.

Authors:  Shinsuke Iida; Ryuzo Ueda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  The MMSET protein is a histone methyltransferase with characteristics of a transcriptional corepressor.

Authors:  Jotin Marango; Manabu Shimoyama; Hitomi Nishio; Julia A Meyer; Dong-Joon Min; Andres Sirulnik; Yolanda Martinez-Martinez; Marta Chesi; P Leif Bergsagel; Ming-Ming Zhou; Samuel Waxman; Boris A Leibovitch; Martin J Walsh; Jonathan D Licht
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.