Literature DB >> 23731996

Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.

Richard T Scott1, Kathleen M Upham, Eric J Forman, Kathleen H Hong, Katherine L Scott, Deanne Taylor, Xin Tao, Nathan R Treff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blastocyst biopsy and rapid quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) implantation and delivery rates.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Academic reproductive medicine center. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples in whom the female partner (or oocyte donor) is between the ages of 21 and 42 years who are attempting conception through IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Embryonic aneuploidy screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sustained implantation and delivery rates. RESULT(S): We transferred 134 blastocysts to 72 patients in the study (CCS) group and 163 blastocysts to 83 patients in the routine care (control) group. Sustained implantation rates (probability that an embryo will implant and progress to delivery) were statistically significantly higher in the CCS group (89 of 134; 66.4%) compared with those from the control group (78 of 163; 47.9%). Delivery rates per cycle were also statistically significantly higher in the CCS group. Sixty one of 72 treatment cycles using CCS led to delivery (84.7%), and 56 of 83 (67.5%) control cycles ultimately delivered. Outcomes were excellent in both groups, but use of CCS clearly improved patient outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): Blastocyst biopsy with rapid qPCR-based comprehensive chromosomal screening results in statistically significantly improved IVF outcomes, as evidenced by meaningful increases in sustained implantation and delivery rates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01219283.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; blastocyst; comprehensive chromosomal screening; embryonic aneuploidy; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23731996     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  136 in total

1.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Taraneh Nazem; Alan Berkeley; Steven Palter; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Mired in mosaicism: the perils of genome trivialization.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Genotyping single-sperm cells by universal MARSALA enables the acquisition of linkage information for combined pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and genome screening.

Authors:  Haitao Wu; Xiaoting Shen; Lei Huang; Yanhong Zeng; Yumei Gao; Lin Shao; Baomin Lu; Yiping Zhong; Benyu Miao; Yanwen Xu; Yali Wang; Yubin Li; Luoxing Xiong; Sijia Lu; X Sunney Xie; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Genetics and Epigenetics of Infertility and Treatments on Outcomes.

Authors:  Margareta D Pisarska; Jessica L Chan; Kate Lawrenson; Tania L Gonzalez; Erica T Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

10.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.