Literature DB >> 23729332

Comparative exploration of whole-body MR through locally rigid transforms.

Oleh Dzyubachyk1, Jorik Blaas, Charl P Botha, Marius Staring, Monique Reijnierse, Johan L Bloem, Rob J van der Geest, Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whole-body MRI is seeing increasing use in the study and diagnosis of disease progression. In this, a central task is the visual assessment of the progressive changes that occur between two whole-body MRI datasets, taken at baseline and follow-up. Current radiological workflow for this consists in manual search of each organ of interest on both scans, usually on multiple data channels, for further visual comparison. Large size of datasets, significant posture differences, and changes in patient anatomy turn manual matching in an extremely labor-intensive task that requires from radiologists high concentration for long period of time. This strongly limits the productivity and increases risk of underdiagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a novel approach to the comparative visual analysis of whole-body MRI follow-up data. Our method is based on interactive derivation of locally rigid transforms from a pre-computed whole-body deformable registration. Using this approach, baseline and follow-up slices can be interactively matched with a single mouse click in the anatomical region of interest. In addition to the synchronized side-by-side baseline and matched follow-up slices, we have integrated four techniques to further facilitate the visual comparison of the two datasets: the "deformation sphere", the color fusion view, the magic lens, and a set of uncertainty iso-contours around the current region of interest.
RESULTS: We have applied our method to the study of cancerous bone lesions over time in patients with Kahler's disease. During these studies, the radiologist carefully visually examines a large number of anatomical sites for changes. Our interactive locally rigid matching approach was found helpful in localization of cancerous lesions and visual assessment of changes between different scans. Furthermore, each of the features integrated in our software was separately evaluated by the experts.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated how our method significantly facilitates examination of whole-body MR datasets in follow-up studies by enabling the rapid interactive matching of regions of interest and by the explicit visualization of change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23729332      PMCID: PMC3702961          DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0820-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  23 in total

Review 1.  A survey of medical image registration.

Authors:  J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations.

Authors:  David Mattes; David R Haynor; Hubert Vesselle; Thomas K Lewellen; William Eubank
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Automated segmentation of necrotic femoral head from 3D MR data.

Authors:  Reza A Zoroofi; Yoshinobu Sato; Takashi Nishii; Nobuhiko Sugano; Hideki Yoshikawa; Shinichi Tamura
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Whole-body T1 mapping improves the definition of adipose tissue: consequences for automated image analysis.

Authors:  Joel Kullberg; Jan-Erik Angelhed; Lars Lönn; John Brandberg; Håkan Ahlström; Hans Frimmel; Lars Johansson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Full body virtual autopsies using a state-of-the-art volume rendering pipeline.

Authors:  Patric Ljung; Calle Winskog; Anders Persson; Claes Lundström; Anders Ynnerman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.579

7.  [Generating statements at whole-body imaging with a workflow-optimized software tool--first experiences with multireader analysis].

Authors:  C Müller-Horvat; C Plathow; B Ludescher; M P Lichy; V Canda; C Zindel; H K Hahn; H-O Peitgen; J Kuhnigk; C D Claussen; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-07

8.  Whole-body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted images.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Nakanishi; Midori Kobayashi; Kazunori Nakaguchi; Miyaji Kyakuno; Nobuyuki Hashimoto; Hiromitsu Onishi; Noboru Maeda; Saki Nakata; Masatomo Kuwabara; Takamichi Murakami; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display.

Authors:  Taro Takahara; Yutaka Imai; Tomohiro Yamashita; Seiei Yasuda; Seiji Nasu; Marc Van Cauteren
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body MR screening.

Authors:  Joan C Vilanova; Joaquim Barceló
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  1 in total

1.  Computer-aided evaluation of inflammatory changes over time on MRI of the spine in patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Evgeni Aizenberg; Rosaline van den Berg; Zineb Ez-Zaitouni; Désirée van der Heijde; Monique Reijnierse; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 1.930

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.