PURPOSE: To determine whether a whole-body T1-mapping acquisition method improves the definition of adipose tissue (AT) and simplifies automated AT segmentation compared to an image-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 10 subjects. Two whole-body volumes were acquired from each subject using two different flip angles. Whole-body T1 maps were calculated from each pair of whole-body volumes. AT was automatically segmented from the T1 maps and from the original image slices. The results were evaluated using manually segmented slices as reference. RESULTS: The T1-mapping method segmented more of the reference AT than the image-based method, with mean values (standard deviations (SDs)) of 87.7(5.1)% and 81.1(5.2)%, respectively. Compared to the image-based method, the T1-mapping method gives better histogram separation of AT in whole-body volumes. The suggested method also provides an output with smaller in-slice AT intensity variations. CONCLUSION: The T1-mapping method improves the definition of AT. T1-based analysis is superior to analysis based on the original images, and allows fully automated and accurate whole-body AT segmentation.
PURPOSE: To determine whether a whole-body T1-mapping acquisition method improves the definition of adipose tissue (AT) and simplifies automated AT segmentation compared to an image-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 10 subjects. Two whole-body volumes were acquired from each subject using two different flip angles. Whole-body T1 maps were calculated from each pair of whole-body volumes. AT was automatically segmented from the T1 maps and from the original image slices. The results were evaluated using manually segmented slices as reference. RESULTS: The T1-mapping method segmented more of the reference AT than the image-based method, with mean values (standard deviations (SDs)) of 87.7(5.1)% and 81.1(5.2)%, respectively. Compared to the image-based method, the T1-mapping method gives better histogram separation of AT in whole-body volumes. The suggested method also provides an output with smaller in-slice AT intensity variations. CONCLUSION: The T1-mapping method improves the definition of AT. T1-based analysis is superior to analysis based on the original images, and allows fully automated and accurate whole-body AT segmentation.
Authors: Andrew T Grainger; Arun Krishnaraj; Michael H Quinones; Nicholas J Tustison; Samantha Epstein; Daniela Fuller; Aakash Jha; Kevin L Allman; Weibin Shi Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Oleh Dzyubachyk; Jorik Blaas; Charl P Botha; Marius Staring; Monique Reijnierse; Johan L Bloem; Rob J van der Geest; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: L Johansson; M Roos; J Kullberg; J Weis; H Ahlström; M Sundbom; B Edén Engström; F A Karlsson Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 4.129