Literature DB >> 2372495

Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation.

L Gustafsson1, H O Adami.   

Abstract

Parameters characterising the progression of cervical neoplasia were estimated from population-based cancer and mortality statistics in Sweden for 1958-1981 by means of a dynamic computer model. Proceeding from that model and these data, the incidence and prevalence curves were constructed, the effects of the extensive cytological screening measures introduced during the 1960s were assessed, and future gains due to the measures already undertaken up to 1981 could be simulated. About 4,000 cases of cancer in situ were diagnosed annually in Sweden after the end of the 1960s, most of them in women born later than 1919. The maximum reduction in the number of invasive cancers up to 1981 was 42% for women born in 1919-1923, but increased progressively for later birth cohorts and reached 69% for those born in 1934-1938. The corresponding reduction in mortality rates was of the same magnitude. The screening measures up to 1981 will ultimately result in a reduction of invasive cancer by about 12,500 cases and of the number of deaths due to this disease by about 4,100. Only a part of the total gain in the number of lives saved had been revealed at the end of the study period in 1981.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2372495      PMCID: PMC1971706          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1990.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

1.  Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-13

2.  An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model.

Authors:  D M Parkin; S M Moss
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register. Non-notified cancer cases recorded on death certificates in 1978.

Authors:  B Mattsson; A Wallgren
Journal:  Acta Radiol Oncol       Date:  1984

4.  Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980.

Authors:  F Pettersson; E Björkholm; I Näslund
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland.

Authors:  J E Macgregor; S M Moss; D M Parkin; N E Day
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-25

7.  Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer. What can you expect?

Authors:  B Stenkvist; R Bergström; G Eklund; C H Fox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia: consistent results obtained by an identification technique.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; H O Adami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Ages and frequencies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  E G Knox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of screening programmes for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  M Hakama; J Chamberlain; N E Day; A B Miller; P C Prorok
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Optimization of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; H O Adami
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cervical cancer screening and follow-up in 4 geographically diverse US health care systems, 1998 through 2007.

Authors:  Sheila Weinmann; Andrew E Williams; Aruna Kamineni; Diana S M Buist; Erin E Masterson; Natasha K Stout; Azadeh Stark; Tyler R Ross; Christopher L Owens; Terry S Field; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Immigrant women's experiences and views on the prevention of cervical cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria Grandahl; Tanja Tydén; Maria Gottvall; Ragnar Westerling; Marie Oscarsson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Alcoholism and cancer risk: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  H O Adami; J K McLaughlin; A W Hsing; A Wolk; A Ekbom; L Holmberg; I Persson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Low risk of cervical cancer during a long period after negative screening in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M E van den Akker-van Marle; M van Ballegooijen; J D F Habbema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  When Life Got in the Way: How Danish and Norwegian Immigrant Women in Sweden Reason about Cervical Screening and Why They Postpone Attendance.

Authors:  Fatima Azerkan; Catarina Widmark; Pär Sparén; Elisabete Weiderpass; Per Tillgren; Elisabeth Faxelid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; P Sparén; M Gustafsson; E Wilander; R Bergström; H O Adami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.