Literature DB >> 23720532

Factors associated with choice of web or print intervention materials in the healthy directions 2 study.

Mary L Greaney1, Elaine Puleo, Gary G Bennett, Jess Haines, K Viswanath, Matthew W Gillman, Kim Sprunck-Harrild, Molly Coeling, Donna Rusinak, Karen M Emmons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many U.S. adults have multiple behavioral risk factors, and effective, scalable interventions are needed to promote population-level health. In the health care setting, interventions are often provided in print, although accessible to nearly everyone, are brief (e.g., pamphlets), are not interactive, and can require some logistics around distribution. Web-based interventions offer more interactivity but may not be accessible to all. Healthy Directions 2 was a primary care-based cluster randomized controlled trial designed to improve five behavioral cancer risk factors among a diverse sample of adults (n = 2,440) in metropolitan Boston. Intervention materials were available via print or the web. Purpose. To (a) describe the Healthy Directions 2 study design and (b) identify baseline factors associated with whether participants opted for print or web-based materials.
METHODS: Hierarchical regression models corrected for clustering by physician were built to examine factors associated with choice of intervention modality.
RESULTS: At baseline, just 4.0% of participants met all behavioral recommendations. Nearly equivalent numbers of intervention participants opted for print and web-based materials (44.6% vs. 55.4%). Participants choosing web-based materials were younger, and reported having a better financial status, better perceived health, greater computer comfort, and more frequent Internet use (p < .05) than those opting for print. In addition, Whites were more likely to pick web-based material than Black participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions addressing multiple behaviors are needed in the primary care setting, but they should be available in web and print formats as nearly equal number of participants chose each option, and there are significant differences in the population groups using each modality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-based health education; health promotion; multiple risk behaviors; multiple risk factor interventions; print intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23720532      PMCID: PMC4638389          DOI: 10.1177/1090198113486803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  48 in total

Review 1.  Addressing multiple behavioral risk factors in primary care. A synthesis of current knowledge and stakeholder dialogue sessions.

Authors:  Nicolaas P Pronk; C J Peek; Michael G Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Temporal and regional trends in the prevalence of healthy lifestyle characteristics: United States, 1994-2007.

Authors:  Jonathan P Troost; Ann P Rafferty; Zhehui Luo; Mathew J Reeves
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Tobacco use cessation and weight management among motor freight workers: results of the gear up for health study.

Authors:  Glorian Sorensen; Anne Stoddard; Lisa Quintiliani; Cara Ebbeling; Eve Nagler; May Yang; Lesley Pereira; Lorraine Wallace
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Creating a framework for getting quality into the public health system.

Authors:  Peggy A Honoré; Donald Wright; Donald M Berwick; Carolyn M Clancy; Peter Lee; Juleigh Nowinski; Howard K Koh
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; James O Prochaska; Joseph S Rossi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  The Chronic Illness Resources Survey: cross-validation and sensitivity to intervention.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Deborah J Toobert; Manuel Barrera; Lisa A Strycker
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2004-11-30

7.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion.

Authors:  James O Prochaska; Susan Butterworth; Colleen A Redding; Verna Burden; Nancy Perrin; Michael Leo; Marna Flaherty-Robb; Janice M Prochaska
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations.

Authors:  M Serdula; R Coates; T Byers; A Mokdad; S Jewell; N Chávez; J Mares-Perlman; P Newcomb; C Ritenbaugh; F Treiber
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Design and baseline characteristics of the 10 Small Steps Study: a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote healthy behaviour using a lifestyle score and personalised feedback.

Authors:  Sanjoti Parekh; Corneel Vandelanotte; David King; Frances M Boyle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  7 in total

1.  Feasibility of a web-based training system for peer community health advisors in cancer early detection among african americans.

Authors:  Sherie Lou Z Santos; Erin K Tagai; Min Qi Wang; Mary Ann Scheirer; Jimmie L Slade; Cheryl L Holt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A Web-Based and Print-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention for Prostate and Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Comparison of User Characteristics and Intervention Use.

Authors:  Rianne Henrica Johanna Golsteijn; Catherine Bolman; Denise Astrid Peels; Esmee Volders; Hein de Vries; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The Use of Cancer-Specific Patient-Centered Technologies Among Underserved Populations in the United States: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Will L Tarver; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Digital Health Promotion and Prevention in Settings: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anna Lea Stark; Cornelia Geukes; Christoph Dockweiler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  A formative evaluation of the SWITCH® obesity prevention program: print versus online programming.

Authors:  Gregory J Welk; Senlin Chen; Yoon Ho Nam; Tara E Weber
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2015-05-03

6.  Effectiveness of tailored lifestyle interventions, using web-based and print-mail, for reducing blood pressure among rural women with prehypertension: main results of the Wellness for Women: DASHing towards Health clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Hageman; Carol H Pullen; Melody Hertzog; Linda S Boeckner
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Supporting healthful lifestyles during pregnancy: a health coach intervention pilot study.

Authors:  Michael W Seward; Denise Simon; Martha Richardson; Emily Oken; Matthew W Gillman; Marie-France Hivert
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.