Literature DB >> 1549430

Sex differences in performance and hemispheric organization for a nonverbal auditory task.

G W McRoberts1, B Sanders.   

Abstract

Musically experienced and inexperienced men and women discriminated among fundamental-frequency contours presented either binaurally (i.e., same contour to both ears) or dichotically (i.e., different contours to each ear). On two separate occasions, males made significantly fewer errors than did females in the binaural condition, but not in the dichotic condition. Subjects with prior musical experience were superior to musically naive subjects in both conditions. The dichotic pitch task produced a left-ear advantage, which was unrelated to gender or musical experience. The results suggest that the male advantage on the binaural task reflects a sex difference in the coordination of the two hemispheres during conjoint processing of the same stimuli rather than a difference in the direction or degree of hemispheric specialization for these stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549430     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  The measure of laterality.

Authors:  J C Marshall; D Caplan; J M Holmes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  RESPONSES OF AUDITORY CORTICAL NEURONS TO STIMULI OF CHANGING FREQUENCY.

Authors:  I C WHITFIELD; E F EVANS
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Left hemisphere dominance for rhythmic elements in dichotically-presented melodies.

Authors:  H W Gordon
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Cerebral lateralization and spatial ability.

Authors:  J Levy
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Sex and the single hemisphere: specialization of the right hemisphere for spatial processing.

Authors:  D F Witelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Cerebral and sex differences in the categorization of haptic information.

Authors:  H Cohen; J Levy
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  T G Bever; R J Chiarello
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Hemispheric asymmetry for dichotically-presented chords in musicians and non-musicians, males and females.

Authors:  H W Gordon
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1978-09

10.  The brain connection: the corpus callosum is larger in left-handers.

Authors:  S F Witelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Finding your voice: a singing lesson from functional imaging.

Authors:  Sarah J Wilson; David F Abbott; Dean Lusher; Ellen C Gentle; Graeme D Jackson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Are men better than women at acoustic size judgements?

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; Anna M Taylor; David Reby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Individual differences in the discrimination of novel speech sounds: effects of sex, temporal processing, musical and cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; John C Thoresen; Neil W Kirk; Felix Schaeffler; Patricia J Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.