Literature DB >> 23719796

Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex.

David E Anderson1, Edward F Ester, John T Serences, Edward Awh.   

Abstract

Multiple studies have documented an inverse relationship between the number of to-be-attended or remembered items in a display ("set size") and task performance. The neural source of this decline in cognitive performance is currently under debate. Here, we used a combination of fMRI and a forward encoding model of orientation selectivity to generate population tuning functions for each of two stimuli while human observers attended either one or both items. We observed (1) clear population tuning functions for the attended item(s) that peaked at the stimulus orientation and decreased monotonically as the angular distance from this orientation increased, (2) a set-size-dependent decline in the relative precision of orientation-specific population responses, such that attending two items yielded a decline in selectivity of the population tuning function for each item, and (3) that the magnitude of the loss of precision in population tuning functions predicted individual differences in the behavioral cost of attending an additional item. These findings demonstrate that attending multiple items degrades the precision of perceptual representations for the target items and provides a straightforward account for the associated impairments in visually guided behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719796      PMCID: PMC3710664          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0239-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  76 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory.

Authors:  A Raffone; G Wolters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo; Miranda Scolari; Tiffany Ho; L Tugan Muftuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis.

Authors:  W Singer; C M Gray
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Laura L Colgin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  7 in total

1.  Normalization in human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; Vanessa Arnedo; Shani Offen; David J Heeger; Arthur C Grant
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Janneke F M Jehee; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Spatial specificity of working memory representations in the early visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Induced α rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision.

Authors:  David E Anderson; John T Serences; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations related to retrospectively orienting attention within working memory.

Authors:  Claudia Poch; Pablo Campo; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Reconstructions of information in visual spatial working memory degrade with memory load.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Edward F Ester; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 10.834

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.