Literature DB >> 23718722

The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.

Eline M Bunnik1, Antina de Jong, Niels Nijsingh, Guido M W R de Wert.   

Abstract

The advent of new genetic and genomic technologies may cause friction with the principle of respect for autonomy and demands a rethinking of traditional interpretations of the concept of informed consent. Technologies such as whole-genome sequencing and micro-array based analysis enable genome-wide testing for many heterogeneous abnormalities and predispositions simultaneously. This may challenge the feasibility of providing adequate pre-test information and achieving autonomous decision-making. At a symposium held at the 11th World Congress of Bioethics in June 2012 (Rotterdam), organized by the International Association of Bioethics, these challenges were presented for three different areas in which these so-called 'new genetics' technologies are increasingly being applied: newborn screening, prenatal screening strategies and commercial personal genome testing. In this article, we build upon the existing ethical framework for a responsible set-up of testing and screening offers and reinterpret some of its criteria in the light of the new genetics. As we will argue, the scope of a responsible testing or screening offer should align with the purpose(s) of testing and with the principle of respect for autonomy for all stakeholders involved, including (future) children. Informed consent is a prerequisite but requires a new approach. We present preliminary and general directions for an individualized or differentiated set-up of the testing offer and for the informed consent process. With this article we wish to contribute to the formation of new ideas on how to tackle the issues of autonomy and informed consent for (public) healthcare and direct-to-consumer applications of the new genetics.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23718722     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  22 in total

Review 1.  Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  International differences in the evaluation of conditions for newborn bloodspot screening: a review of scientific literature and policy documents.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; Selina C Metternick-Jones; Karla J Lister
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The devil is in the details: confidentiality challenges in the age of genetics.

Authors:  Barbara J Daly; Ashley Rosko; Shulin Zhang; Hillard M Lazarus
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2015-03

4.  Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Kelly Gilmore; Emily Hardisty; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Ashley N Tomlinson; Debra Skinner; Denise L Perry; Sarah R Scollon; Myra I Roche; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Whole Exome Sequencing: Applications in Prenatal Genetics.

Authors:  Angie C Jelin; Neeta Vora
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Patient feedback and early outcome data with a novel tiered-binned model for multiplex breast cancer susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Diana Harris; Evelyn M Stevens; Kara N Maxwell; Abha Kulkarni; Tyler Chavez; Amanda Brandt; Jessica M Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Megan E Grove; Mildred K Cho; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.159

9.  Multiplex genetic testing: reconsidering utility and informed consent in the era of next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Susan Domchek
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lilian Downie; Jane Halliday; Sharon Lewis; David J Amor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.