Element pool changes within a scrub-oak ecosystem after 11 years of exposure to elevated CO2.

The effects of elevated CO2 on ecosystem element stocks are equivocal, in part because cumulative effects of CO2 on element pools are difficult to detect. We conducted a complete above and belowground inventory of non-nitrogen macro- and micronutrient stocks in a subtropical woodland exposed to twice-ambient CO2 concentrations for 11 years. We analyzed a suite of nutrient elements and metals important for nutrient cycling in soils to a depth of ~2 m, in leaves and stems of the dominant oaks, in fine and coarse roots, and in litter. In conjunction with large biomass stimulation, elevated CO2 increased oak stem stocks of Na, Mg, P, K, V, Zn and Mo, and the aboveground pool of K and S. Elevated CO2 increased root pools of most elements, except Zn. CO2-stimulation of plant Ca was larger than the decline in the extractable Ca pool in soils, whereas for other elements, increased plant uptake matched the decline in the extractable pool in soil. We conclude that elevated CO2 caused a net transfer of a subset of nutrients from soil to plants, suggesting that ecosystems with a positive plant growth response under high CO2 will likely cause mobilization of elements from soil pools to plant biomass.

Introduction

Many studies n class="Chemical">hapan> class="Chemical">ve evaluated the effects of elevated CO2 on nitrogen cycling, and focused on the hypothesis that tree growth response to elevated CO2 may be limited by N availability, or change with N use efficiency [1]–[4], but the impact of CO2 on elements other than N has been studied less frequently. The nutrients P, K and Ca can also limit plant productivity [5], [6], non-N nutrients can limit N2 fixation and C storage [7], and changes in Al, Mn and Fe concentrations might affect the availability of other mineral nutrients in soils [8]. To fully assess the impact of elevated CO2 on ecosystem nutrient cycling, it is important to evaluate effects on all elements that are necessary for plant nutrition and elements that control the availability of other nutrients in the soil system.

Photosynthesis and growth are often stimulated by elevated pan> class="Chemical">CO2 in C3 plants [9], [10], often leading to more biomass production. Increased growth increases nutrient demands [11]. It has been suggested that nutrients become more limiting for growth over time and can limit terrestrial C uptake [12]. Increased production of carbohydrates in plants is suggested to reduce element concentrations in plants [13]. Elevated CO2 generally reduces plant N concentration, but increased growth does not inherently dilute the concentration of other elements in plant tissues [14]–[18]. In sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Johnson et al. [17] found significant declines in foliar Fe concentration with elevated CO2. At the POP-EUROFACE CO2 experiment, there was no change in poplar leaf K or Ca concentrations, while Mg concentration actually increased in those trees [19]. A cross-experiment evaluation of elevated CO2 by Natali et al. [20] showed significantly lower Fe concentration in sweet gum at the Duke FACE site, decreased Al, V and Fe concentrations in sweet gum at the Oak Ridge FACE site, but increased Mn and Mo concentrations in Quercus myrtifolia at the Smithsonian Institution Elevated CO2 site in Florida. Lastly, a recent meta-analysis of 14 tree species and 10 nutrient elements found that elevated CO2 lowers Cu, Fe, K, Mg, P and S concentrations, but only at high N availability [15].

Element availability pan> class="Chemical">varies by soil type and ecosystem. Soil element availability is a function of soil organic matter content (SOM) and pH, with elements generally less adsorbed to metal oxides and SOM in acid soils [21]. Elevated CO2 has been shown to increase P availability, possibly a function of decline in SOM in the experimental plots [22]. Elevated CO2 has also been implicated in reducing leaching of soil N and P from upper soil layers [17]. A recent study found that trace metal concentrations increased in soils exposed to elevated CO2 at Duke FACE and Oak Ridge FACE, but decreased under elevated CO2 for every element surveyed at the Florida SERC experiment [20].

Johnson et al. [23] reported a decreapan> class="Chemical">se in foliar N and S concentration of scrub-oak (Q. myrtifolia), an increase in oak foliar Mn, and no change in P, K, Cu, B or Zn after 5 years of CO2 enrichment [23]. However, because biomass was significantly higher under elevated CO2, total plant pool sizes (on an area basis) for all elements were increased under elevated CO2. The data reported here were collected at the end of the Florida CO2 experiment, providing an assessment of the cumulative effect of more than a decade of CO2 enrichment on soil element pools. We evaluate the impacts of elevated CO2 on a scrub-oak stand in a fire-regenerated ecosystem by quantifying soil, litter and plant tissue (above and below ground tissue) element pools after 11 years, and to determine if elevated CO2 facilitated nutrient retention, loss or redistribution in this system.

Our overarching hypothesis was tpan> class="Chemical">hat declines in soil nutrients under elevated CO2 are quantitatively caused by increases in plant pools, in other words, that the cumulative impact of elevated CO2 is to redistribute elements in the plant-soil system. Specifically, we hypothesized that nutrient cycling in the Florida ecosystem changed under elevated CO2 in the following ways:

1) Increan class="Chemical">ses inpan> abopan> class="Chemical">veground biomass driven by elevated CO2 will increase the pool size of elements in those tissues (leaves, stems, litter and roots).

2) Increan class="Chemical">sed planpan>t uptake depletes planpan>t soluble elemenpan>t pools inpan> soils expopan> class="Chemical">sed to elevated CO2.

3) Element retention in this ecosystem will increan class="Chemical">se unpan>der elepan> class="Chemical">vated CO2 because of increased plant element pools, especially in long-lived tissue like wood and coarse roots.

Materials and Methods

Study site

Our study was conducted at the Smithsonian Enn class="Chemical">vironpan>menpan>tpan> class="Chemical">al Research Center’s long-term elevated CO2 experiment at Kennedy Space Center, Cape Canaveral, Florida, USA (28° 38′ N, 80° 42′ W). The experiment consisted of 16 octagonal open-top chambers that were 2.5 m high covering a ground surface area of 9.42 m2. Eight chambers were kept at ambient atmospheric CO2 concentration (ambient treatment) and 8 chambers were maintained at ambient +360 µmol mol−1 CO2 (elevated treatment) from May 1996 to June 2007. Soils at the site are acidic sands (Arenic Haplahumods and Spodic Quartzipsamments). The vegetation is Florida coastal scrub-oak palmetto [23], [24]. In the experimental chambers, greater than 90% of the aboveground biomass is scrub oak [25].

Field collections

We n class="Chemical">harpan> class="Chemical">vested aboveground biomass in July 2007. We took foliar samples by collecting 5 fully expanded leaves per tree (Q. myrtifolia) from 5 distinct trees per plot. Oak stem samples were taken from 5 large branches from the main trunk per plot. We also took samples from the principal symbiotic nitrogen-fixing vine in the system, Galactia elliottii. We collected leaves from 5 G. elliottii vines per plot.

Soil was collected with a 7 cm diameter soil core at five locationpan>s within each cpan> class="Chemical">hamber. We separated horizons as follows: A horizon (0–10 cm), E horizon (10–30 cm), E2 horizon (30–100 cm) and spodic horizon (Bh), a distinct zone of organic matter accumulation that varied from ∼100–250 cm depth. Because the spodic horizon varies in depth and is the deepest soil layer above the vadose zone, not all of the chambers were sampled to the same depth. The cores from each plot were combined per depth into a single composite sample for element analysis.

We collected litter from 1.18 m2 of the cn class="Chemical">hamber. We collected roots from soil cores by siepan> class="Chemical">ving (2 mm mesh). For each soil depth, we separated roots by size into fine (<2 mm diameter) and coarse (>2 mm) fractions. Nutrient concentrations in root tissues were scaled up using root biomass estimates based on minirhizotron photographs (fine roots) and ground penetrating radar imaging [26].

Sample Preparation and Element Analysis

We ann class="Chemical">alyzed soil anpan>d planpan>t tissues from the experimenpan>tpan> class="Chemical">al site for the following elements (in order by atomic mass): Na, Mg, Al, P, S, K, Ca, V, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Se, Sr and Mo. All glass wear and plastic containers used for sample extractions and digestions were acid washed in 0.5 M HCl for 48 hours prior to use. All acid reagents were of trace-metal clean purity. Prior to soil digestions and extractions, roots were removed from soil core samples and all soil was passed through a 2 mm sieve and oven dried at 105 °C. An acid digestion was used to prepare samples for measuring total soil element concentrations. Dried soil samples of 100–150 mg were ashed at 600 °C prior to acid digestion in a MARS microwave digestor. Microwave digestion was performed for 20 minute runs at 200 °C with trace metal grade, concentrated HF, HNO3 − and HCl, until all soil was dissolved into solution.

Plant-available elemenpan>t pools in soil were determined using anpan> pan> class="Chemical">ammonium oxalate extraction [27]. One (1.0) g of soil was extracted in 15 ml of 0.3 M ammonium oxalate in a 60 ml sample cup, placed on a reciprocal shaker at 180 rpm for 18 h, filtered, diluted 10 times, and re-suspended in 10 ml of 0.32 M trace metal grade HNO3. We use this extraction as an estimate of plant-available element pools because the yields from this extraction fall within the published values for plant available elements and are consistent with the percent of the plant available element pool compared to the total (in this case acid digest) element pool [8], [28].

Plant tissues (leaves, woody biomass anpan>d roots) were opan> class="Chemical">ven dried at 60 °C for 24 h after collection. Roots were cleaned of excess soil by sonicating ∼3–5 g of root tissue in15 ml centrifuge tubes for 30 minutes in ultrapure (18 MΩ) water. The washed roots were again oven-dried for 24 h at 60°C. All plant samples were then ashed at 600 °C, and 500–600 mg of each ashed sample was acid digested on the MARS microwave digestor. Element analyses were conducted using Thermo X Series quadrupole ICP-MS.

Estimates of totn class="Chemical">al planpan>t biomass [25], were upan> class="Chemical">sed to calculate the aboveground pool of elements. We multiplied element concentrations from Q. myrtifolia leaves and stems with total leaf and stem biomass to estimate the overall content of nutrients in the three oak species. G. elliottii element concentrations were likewise multiplied by biomass. The belowground plant element pool (to 100 cm) was calculated by multiplying the element concentration of roots by their biomass.

Statistical Analyses & Data Availability

We analyzed the efpan> class="Chemical">fects of CO2 on Q. myrtifolia biomass, element concentration, and element mass with a one-way ANOVA. We also used a two-way ANOVA model to test for CO2 effects and differences in the element mass of different plant pools (leaves, stems, litter and roots), and interactions between those factors. The effect of elevated CO2 on soil element mass was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA model with CO2 treatments and soil depth as the repeated measure. We employed the two-tailed Flinger-Killen test to check assumptions of equal variance [29]. Pairwise comparisons of CO2 effects on soil pools by depth were made using Tukey’s HSD test. Due to relatively low sample size (n = 8 per treatment), we use an alpha of 0.10 to determine significance [20].

To control for family-wise error rates, we upan> class="Chemical">sed the False Discovery Rate (FDR) test to ensure that using a large number of pair-wise tests for CO2 effects did not yield a significant number of Type I errors. Our tests of multiple elements within a “group”, for example, soil plant available element pools, consisted of 15 individual ANOVAs. In all cases, the FDR expected less than one false discovery per group of multiple tests, justifying our use of multiple ANOVAs.

We n class="Chemical">also cpan> class="Chemical">alculated the percent effect of elevated CO2 on nutrient pools:

To ensure tn class="Chemical">hat we were able to detect difpan> class="Chemical">ferences due to the CO2 treatment with relatively low sample size, and reduce our study-level Type II error rate, we also used resampling with replacement to determine the % effect size of elevated CO2 effects on element pools, an approach complementary to ANOVA for determining differences between treatments [30]. We re-sampled from the sample population of element masses in elevated CO2 plots and ambient CO2 plots, with replacement (1000 iterations). This approach enabled us to determine the mean effect of elevated CO2 compared to the control plots, as well as calculate 90% confidence intervals around the mean effect size. We consider the CO2 effect meaningful if the confidence intervals do not overlap 0. Statistical analyses were performed in JMP, Microsoft Excel and R [31]. Data used in these analyses are available online via the University of Illinois’ Institute for Genomic Biology Public Data Archive [32].

Results

The concentration of V anpan>d Ca decreapan> class="Chemical">sed in Q. myrtifolia leaves exposed to elevated CO2 (F1,14 = 3.22, P = 0.09; F1,14 = 3.20, P = 0.09, respectively), but foliar S concentration increased (F1,14 = 5.66, P = 0.03). Elevated CO2 reduced the concentration of stem Ca (F1,14 = 5.93, P = 0.03), Mn (F1,14 = 3.17, P = 0.10) and Fe (F1,14 = 4.18, P = 0.06). Elevated CO2 did not significantly change the concentration of any element measured in root tissue or in the litter layer.

The total abopan> class="Chemical">veground biomass of scrub oak exposed to elevated CO2 was ∼100% higher at the end of the experiment (F1,14 = 10.44, P = 0.01, from ref. 25). Pools of K and S in total above ground oak biomass were greater under elevated CO2 (P<0.05) compared to ambient CO2 (Table 1). The effect of CO2 exposure suggests a greater accumulation of S under elevated CO2 (Figure 1A). Oak stems under elevated CO2 hosted significantly greater pools of Na, Mg, P, K, V, Zn and Mo (ANOVA, P<0.10; Table 1), and our resample analysis suggests every element other than Mn and Sr was accumulated in woody tissue under elevated CO2 (Figure 1B).

Table 1

Element pools in the above ground plant biomass, litter layer and roots (0–100 cm, coarse + fine roots) under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2, Kennedy Space Center, Florida.

Element	Tissue	Ambient CO2	SE	Elevated CO2	SE
Na (kg . ha−1)	Foliar	5.09	2.27	1.89	0.86
	Stems*	0.72	0.31	1.22	0.31
	Litter	45.51	6.60	42.54	6.55
	Roots to 100 cm*	87.45	4.54	146.81	26.50
Mg	Foliar	24.25	10.77	15.55	3.26
	Stems*	0.93	0.25	2.26	0.47
	Litter	32.62	4.87	35.75	5.40
	Roots to 100 cm*	69.81	4.63	97.90	12.17
Al	Foliar	0.16	0.08	0.11	0.02
	Stems	0.30	0.10	0.67	0.17
	Litter	41.60	6.51	47.21	6.40
	Roots to 100 cm	91.17	12.90	145.41	24.73
P	Foliar	12.45	4.55	9.52	1.80
	Stems*	0.02	0.01	0.07	0.02
	Litter	6.13	0.98	7.78	1.04
	Roots to 100 cm	3.04	0.29	4.07	0.56
S (g . ha−1)	Foliar	104.08	31.05	299.93	65.71
	Stems	6.26	1.90	13.54	3.11
	Litter	1184.07	157.57	1262.56	135.14
	Roots to 100 cm	168.09	20.35	419.00	130.25
K	Foliar	30.17	8.01	37.87	7.83
	Stems*	78.25	24.26	237.36	51.80
	Litter	80.34	11.40	95.38	14.71
	Roots to 100 cm	382.26	87.86	384.73	72.97
Ca	Foliar	79.76	36.18	48.52	9.10
	Stems	0.32	0.08	0.71	0.16
	Litter	16.96	2.89	20.22	2.53
	Roots to 100 cm	18.47	1.60	26.31	3.20
V (g . ha−1)	Foliar	0.44	0.18	0.30	0.06
	Stems*	7.57	3.51	20.81	6.96
	Litter	356.66	44.52	391.05	48.22
	Roots to 100 cm	0.47	0.07	1.04	0.25
Mn	Foliar	0.71	0.22	0.72	0.14
	Stems	0.07	0.02	0.14	0.03
	Litter	5.26	1.20	4.82	1.04
	Roots to 100 cm	1.98	0.39	2.62	0.53
Fe	Foliar	0.22	0.07	0.18	0.03
	Stems	0.09	0.04	0.13	0.04
	Litter	2.10	0.34	11.28	7.87
	Roots to 100 cm	1.34	0.22	1.74	0.24
Cu (g . ha-1)	Foliar	43.58	13.43	44.07	9.04
	Stems	7.08	2.00	16.06	3.95
	Litter	298.87	46.66	295.14	37.05
	Roots to 100 cm	678.74	118.14	1215.08	292.35
Zn	Foliar	0.20	0.07	0.22	0.04
	Stems*	0.05	0.01	0.09	0.02
	Litter	2.41	0.23	2.83	0.63
	Roots to 100 cm	2.20	0.18	4.37	1.10
Se (g . ha−1)	Foliar	0.14	0.03	0.16	0.06
	Stems	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
	Litter	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
	Roots to 100 cm	0.02	0.00	0.03	0.01
Sr (g . ha−1)	Foliar	235.23	124.75	173.36	41.78
	Stems	55.90	18.00	132.58	36.97
	Litter	2470.91	478.97	2431.55	282.15
	Roots to 100 cm*	3.70	0.43	4.40	0.58
Mo (g . ha−1)	Foliar	0.07	0.02	0.05	0.01
	Stems*	0.91	0.31	1.67	0.38
	Litter	241.24	28.68	264.25	31.25
	Roots to 100 cm	0.10	0.02	0.23	0.07

Asterisks denote significant ANOVA results for larger pools under elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 , ? denotes larger pools in ambient CO2 plots. All units are kg. ha-1 unless specified differently.

Figure 1

Re-sampled effect size (1000 iterations) of elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 means and 90% confidence intervals, for element pools in A) Quercus spp. leaves, B) Quercus spp. stems.

Asterisks denote significant An class="Chemical">NOpan> class="Chemical">VA results for larger pools under elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 , ? denotes larger pools in ambient CO2 plots. All units are kg. ha-1 unless specified differently.

There was generally a positipan> class="Chemical">ve effect of CO2 on the root element pool (Figure 1C). Indeed, our resample analysis showed significant CO2 effect on Na, Mg, Ca and V, and only a negative effect on Zn (Figure 2A). The mass of litter was not significantly changed by CO2 exposure, but compared to foliar and stem tissues there were large pools of Na, Mg, S, V, Fe, Cu, Sr and Mo in the litter layer (Table 1). There was at least a slight trend for a positive CO2 effect on litter pools for every element measured other than Na and Mn (Figure 2B).

Figure 2

Re-sampled effect size (1000 iterations) of elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 means and 90% confidence intervals, for element pools in A) all plant roots to a depth of 1 m and B) the litter layer.

Two-way ANOpan> class="Chemical">VA including CO2 treatment and plant pool as predictor variables revealed that there were significant differences among plant pools for every element measured. This difference was driven by larger pools of elements in roots than other plant material for every element other than Al and Ca, which were in larger quantity in leaf tissue (Table 1). There were significant, positive main CO2 effects on the overall above ground plant element pool for Ca (F1,56 = 2.76, P = 0.10), K (F1,56 = 2.99, P = 0.09) and Sr (F1,56 = 3.00, P = 0.08). There was also a significant CO2 by tissue pool interaction for those three elements (Ca, F3,56 = 2.77, P = 0.05; K, F3,56 = 3.00, P = 0.04; Sr, F3,56 = 3.09, P = 0.03).

Examining the entire soil profile, there was no CO2 efpan> class="Chemical">fect on nutrient pools for the entire soil profile (0–100 cm + Bh) for either the total digest or plant available soil elements (Figure 3A, 3B). There were no CO2 effects when individual horizons were considered independently (Table 2, Table 3), other than plant available Al to a depth of 30 cm (F1,29 = 3.33, P = 0.08). However, we observed a significant effect of horizon depth for all total digest elements, and a horizon effect for plant-available nutrient pools of Mg, Al, K, Ca, V, Mn, Se and Sr (Table 3). We also observed trends in the pool size for different elements at different soil depths. Irrespective of CO2 treatment, there was a large total (acid digest) pool of K in the E2 and Bh (spodic) horizons, and this held for plant available K as well (Table 2, Table 3). Consistent with other spodosols, a large pool of Fe was found in the 10–30 cm portion of the horizon (Table 2). Plant available molybdenum was found in the greatest quantity in the deeper parts of the profile (Table 3).

Figure 3

Re-sampled effect size (1000 iterations) of elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 means and 90% confidence intervals, for elements in A) total acid digest soil pool and B) plant available soil element pools.

Table 2

Total pool (acid digest) of soil elements after 11 years exposure to under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2, Kennedy Space Center, Florida elevated CO2, Kennedy Space Center.

Element	Soil Horizon	Ambient CO2	SEM	Elevated CO2	SEM
Na (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	340.5	23.6	287.2	19.9
	E (10–30 cm)	845.6	128.9	756.4	69.2
	E2 (30–100 cm)	231.1	11.1	216.1	13.4
	Spodic	44.6	2.8	53.4	10.7
Mg (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	46.3	3.1	36.7	1.9
	E (10–30 cm)	64.8	6.6	69	12.8
	E2 (30–100 cm)	7.5	1.5	8.7	1.8
	Spodic	1.5	0.2	1.6	0.2
Al (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	1687.9	219.9	1284.5	145.3
	E (10–30 cm)	2523.9	501.2	2524	366.6
	E2 (30–100 cm)	515.7	122.9	995.6	545.1
	Spodic	245.6	35.2	247.5	39
P (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	9.8	2.2	9.1	2
	E (10–30 cm)	131.8	25.9	103.1	16
	E2 (30–100 cm)	10	3.6	13	3.5
	Spodic	4.1	0.7	5	0.9
S (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	n/a
	E (10–30 cm)	n/a
	E2 (30–100 cm)	6.6	1.4	7.6	1.2
	Spodic	1.2	0	1.2	0
K (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	680.3	62.4	536.7	49.3
	E (10–30 cm)	1527.1	320.1	1346.8	146.5
	E2 (30–100 cm)	126462.7	35285.6	117669.6	31055.1
	Spodic	50398	5619.8	41336.6	4337.6
Ca (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	30.7	1.6	26.5	1.4
	E (10–30 cm)	65.4	6.2	63.9	3.9
	E2 (30–100 cm)	17.2	5.1	18.4	4.7
	Spodic	4.8	0.1	5	0.2
V (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	2.50	0.18	1.99	0.13
	E (10–30 cm)	5.01	0.63	4.87	0.60
	E2 (30–100 cm)	2.44	0.20	2.42	0.17
	Spodic	0.48	0.02	0.52	0.03
Mn (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	19.5	1.5	15.3	1
	E (10–30 cm)	45.8	9.9	40.3	7.9
	E2 (30–100 cm)	4.3	0.8	4.1	0.6
	Spodic	0.8	0	0.9	0.1
Fe (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	72.7	5.8	56.1	3.9
	E (10–30 cm)	137.2	25.5	140	25
	E2 (30–100 cm)	21.9	7.2	19.7	4.5
	Spodic	n/a
Cu (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	3.06	0.20	3.11	0.36
	E (10–30 cm)	6.23	0.50	5.47	0.39
	E2 (30–100 cm)	1.94	0.08	1.97	0.07
	Spodic	316.8	9.3	315.7	10
Zn (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	10.3	1.2	8.1	1
	E (10–30 cm)	16.7	1.5	15.2	1.2
	E2 (30–100 cm)	3.2	0.2	3.7	0.3
	Spodic	0.5	0	0.5	0
Se (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	150.9	6.4	143.4	6.1
	E (10–30 cm)	337	37.4	339.7	21.2
	E2 (30–100 cm)	276.3	264.9	45.3	206.1
	Spodic	54.9	6.5	55.5	8.1
Sr (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	6.89	0.64	4.93	0.39
	E (10–30 cm)	11.25	2.45	11.20	1.55
	E2 (30–100 cm)	3.24	0.52	3.01	0.45
	Spodic	1.03	0.16	1555.3	0.43
Mo (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	318.2	20.4	289.9	12.9
	E (10–30 cm)	685.7	34.1	681.9	30.4
	E2 (30–100 cm)	1785.3	17.4	1758.9	34.6
	Spodic	307.5	6.2	316.9	9

Table 3

Pool of plant available (ammonium oxalate extractable) elements after 11 years exposure to under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2, Kennedy Space Center, Florida elevated CO2, Kennedy Space Center.

Element	Soil Horizon	Ambient CO2	SEM	Elevated CO2	SEM
Na (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	5.12	0.94	4.79	0.65
	E (10–30 cm)	15.20	1.10	15.09	2.15
	E2 (30–100 cm)	11.64	0.29	11.14	0.15
	Spodic	11.94	0.20	10.81	0.60
Mg (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	8.51	2.13	5.41	0.87
	E (10–30 cm)	7.61	1.03	7.04	1.00
	E2 (30–100 cm)	2.50	0.33	2.22	0.12
	Spodic	4.60	0.19	3.54	0.57
Al (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	8.61	1.81	5.25	1.90
	E (10–30 cm)	37.95	11.95	14.42	2.45
	E2 (30–100 cm)	312.01	73.30	286.22	85.62
	Spodic	67.92	2.80	53.47	7.65
P (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	3.50	0.77	3.24	0.70
	E (10–30 cm)	46.99	9.25	36.77	5.69
	E2 (30–100 cm)	7.41	1.55	7.38	1.88
	Spodic	4.81	0.11	3.67	0.77
S (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	12.03	2.67	11.14	2.39
	E (10–30 cm)	161.66	31.81	126.50	19.56
	E2 (30–100 cm)	25.49	5.32	25.39	6.47
	Spodic	16.57	0.37	12.62	2.65
K (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	8.20	1.74	7.04	1.06
	E (10–30 cm)	13.98	3.28	10.06	1.33
	E2 (30–100 cm)	5725.41	422.47	5996.16	389.53
	Spodic	18408.19	605.24	14427.58	2228.08
Ca (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	3.12	1.17	3.11	1.03
	E (10–30 cm)	38.78	3.93	39.55	3.47
	E2 (30–100 cm)	0.63	0.03	0.64	0.03
	Spodic	1.30	0.01	1.01	0.19
V (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	32.97	6.24	14.00	3.05
	E (10–30 cm)	20.98	3.27	15.77	1.05
	E2 (30-100 cm)	152.86	8.68	157.44	12.85
	Spodic	149.04	2.74	133.07	8.72
Mn (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	122.37	19.94	93.03	11.27
	E (10–30 cm)	141.58	11.82	148.75	19.07
	E2 (30–100 cm)	283.02	11.80	281.44	7.11
	Spodic	282.94	8.98	239.83	22.77
Fe (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	7.60	2.16	4.42	1.78
	E (10–30 cm)	27.59	10.71	9.56	1.79
	E2 (30–100 cm)	14.76	3.55	11.53	3.83
	Spodic	3.62	0.17	2.93	0.36
Cu (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	2.26	0.73	2.64	0.86
	E (10–30 cm)	6.12	1.52	10.66	4.05
	E2 (30–100 cm)	0.32	0.08	0.31	0.08
	Spodic	0.34	0.01	0.29	0.03
Zn (kg . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	0.58	0.15	0.47	0.12
	E (10–30 cm)	0.97	0.19	1.30	0.32
	E2 (30–100 cm)	0.76	0.17	0.94	0.18
	Spodic	0.87	0.03	0.73	0.07
Se (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	1.00	0.27	0.65	0.22
	E (10–30 cm)	5.07	2.19	1.74	0.37
	E2 (30–100 cm)	n/a
	Spodic	177.24	12.07	n/a
Sr (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	31.63	3.55	27.64	4.19
	E (10–30 cm)	85.51	11.01	78.84	10.80
	E2 (30–100 cm)	168.69	7.72	164.63	6.23
	Spodic	142.55	2.77	128.73	6.97
Mo (g . ha−1)	A (0–10 cm)	0.99	0.68	0.21	0.02
	E (10–30 cm)	1.25	0.54	0.49	0.03
	E2 (30–100 cm)	97.09	1.11	96.18	1.46
	Spodic	82.78	0.65	80.41	1.19

The efn class="Chemical">fect of pan> class="Chemical">CO2 on the total ecosystem element pool, calculated as the sum of the total plant and plant available element pools in soil, was only significantly higher under elevated CO2 for Ca (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Re-sampled effect size (1000 iterations) of elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 means and 90% confidence intervals, for the total ecosystem element pool, calculated as the difference between the total plant and plant available element pools in soil under elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2.

Discussion

While elevated pan> class="Chemical">CO2 is expected to lower element concentrations in plant leaves [13], element concentrations in oak leaves we measured after 11 years of elevated CO2 exposure were generally not significantly impacted by high CO2. Calcium and V concentrations decreased, but S concentrations were higher in oak leaves in the elevated CO2 treatment. Scrub oaks at the Florida experiment showed significantly greater growth over the 11 years they were exposed to elevated CO2 [25]. The increased above ground oak biomass under elevated CO2 was high enough to consistently lead to increases in above ground plant and litter nutrient element pools irrespective of changes in element concentration (Table 1, Figure 1, Figure 2B).

We did not measure significant differenpan>ces in soil elemenpan>t pools under elepan> class="Chemical">vated CO2 compared to ambient conditions. Combined with the sustained biomass stimulation of oaks under elevated CO2, there is no evidence that non-nitrogen nutrients are limiting growth after extended CO2 enrichment. There was a strong signal for a positive effect of elevated CO2 on root nutrient pools (Figure 1C), and the overall pool of elements in roots for oaks exposed to both elevated and ambient CO2 was often orders of magnitude higher than the element content of stems and leaves, driven by the large below ground biomass pool [33]. Thus, it is possible that these oaks are liberating nutrient elements from the total element pools into soluble forms by increasing production of root exudates, facilitating mycorrhizal colonization and changes to rhizosphere chemistry that facilitate nutrient uptake [34]–[37]. At the end of our study, root biomass was significantly higher under elevated CO2 treatments [33]. If oaks under elevated CO2 are shifting C allocation belowground, which is in turn providing greater root surface area and potentially more root exudate production, it would explain both the possibility that oaks are mining the soil for elements to meet their nutritional demands, as well as the positive effect of CO2 on root element pools (Figure 2B).

We do not n class="Chemical">hapan> class="Chemical">ve direct measurements of Q. myrtifolia mining soils for nutrients via root exudation and rhizosphere acidification. However, a source of nutrient liberation (and therefore facilitation of movement from soils to plant biomass) could come from the “priming” effect of elevated CO2 on organic matter mineralization, which could enhance the release of nutrients like P, Ca and metals bound to SOM. Indeed, we observed that the increase in Ca stocks in oaks was higher than the decline of extractable Ca in the soils (Figure 4). This phenomenon has been observed for N at this site, in the form of increased N mineralization under elevated CO2 [38], and the Ca result supports the hypothesis that CO2 induced soil priming increases nutrient availability could be a general phenomenon.

Calpan> class="Chemical">culating the CO2 effect of total ecosystem elements showed that CO2 enhances Ca retention but not significantly so for other elements (Figure 4). Because of the fire regime of this system, non-volatile elements sequestered in plant biomass will eventually return to the soil, but elements leached from the soil system to the water table are effectively gone from the system [39].

Liu et n class="Chemical">al. [40] measured increapan> class="Chemical">sed leaching of Mg (385%), K (223%), Ca (167%) and NO3 − (108%) under elevated CO2, and attributed element loss to accelerated mineral weathering and higher soil water content under elevated CO2. Element loss through leaching is permanent, and we expect that soluble forms of elements that migrate downward through the soil profile will be exported from the system via lateral transfer [28]. However, the total pool of most elements is large relative to the plant available pool (Table 2, Table 3), and soluble forms of elements (especially K, Fe and Mg) can also be replenished in the soil via geochemical processes like chemical weathering, which may be accelerated by exposure to elevated CO2 [34], [40]. Indeed, our observed trend for lower concentrations of amorphous Al-oxides under elevated CO2 at the Florida site could be a result of accelerated chemical weathering [41].

Our results demonstrate that nutrienpan>t cycling is substanpan>tipan> class="Chemical">ally altered after 11 years of exposure to elevated CO2, but the CO2 effect is element dependent [15], [42]. The strong, positive growth response of oaks to CO2 [25] led to increased pools of some elements (Na, V, Zn and Mo) in plant biomass and quantifiably lower plant available pools of most elements throughout the soil profile (Table 3). However, because there were only significant changes in the movement of some elements, it is likely that CO2 effects on element cycles are not easily generalized.

Conclusions

Our results support the hypothesis that increapan> class="Chemical">ses in oak biomass under elevated CO2 would increase the pool of nutrient elements in oak tissues. We also observed measurably lower stocks of most nutrients in soils under elevated CO2. The observation that Ca was retained in this system under elevated CO2 opens the possibility that some plants actively mine soils under elevated CO2 for nutrients other than N.