Literature DB >> 16330779

Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

Richard J Norby1, Evan H Delucia, Birgit Gielen, Carlo Calfapietra, Christian P Giardina, John S King, Joanne Ledford, Heather R McCarthy, David J P Moore, Reinhart Ceulemans, Paolo De Angelis, Adrien C Finzi, David F Karnosky, Mark E Kubiske, Martin Lukac, Kurt S Pregitzer, Giuseppe E Scarascia-Mugnozza, William H Schlesinger, Ram Oren.   

Abstract

Climate change predictions derived from coupled carbon-climate models are highly dependent on assumptions about feedbacks between the biosphere and atmosphere. One critical feedback occurs if C uptake by the biosphere increases in response to the fossil-fuel driven increase in atmospheric [CO(2)] ("CO(2) fertilization"), thereby slowing the rate of increase in atmospheric [CO(2)]. Carbon exchanges between the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere are often first represented in models as net primary productivity (NPP). However, the contribution of CO(2) fertilization to the future global C cycle has been uncertain, especially in forest ecosystems that dominate global NPP, and models that include a feedback between terrestrial biosphere metabolism and atmospheric [CO(2)] are poorly constrained by experimental evidence. We analyzed the response of NPP to elevated CO(2) ( approximately 550 ppm) in four free-air CO(2) enrichment experiments in forest stands. We show that the response of forest NPP to elevated [CO(2)] is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity, with a stimulation at the median of 23 +/- 2%. At low leaf area indices, a large portion of the response was attributable to increased light absorption, but as leaf area indices increased, the response to elevated [CO(2)] was wholly caused by increased light-use efficiency. The surprising consistency of response across diverse sites provides a benchmark to evaluate predictions of ecosystem and global models and allows us now to focus on unresolved questions about carbon partitioning and retention, and spatial variation in NPP response caused by availability of other growth limiting resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16330779      PMCID: PMC1312431          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509478102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  Nitrogen uptake, distribution, turnover, and efficiency of use in a CO2-enriched sweetgum forest.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Colleen M Iversen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Atmospheric science. Nitrogen and climate change.

Authors:  Bruce A Hungate; Jeffrey S Dukes; M Rebecca Shaw; Yiqi Luo; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Tropospheric O(3) compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO(2).

Authors:  John S King; Mark E Kubiske; Kurt S Pregitzer; George R Hendrey; Evan P McDonald; Christian P Giardina; Vanessa S Quinn; David F Karnosky
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere.

Authors:  R Oren; D S Ellsworth; K H Johnsen; N Phillips; B E Ewers; C Maier; K V Schäfer; H McCarthy; G Hendrey; S G McNulty; G G Katul
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Net carbon storage in a poplar plantation (POPFACE) after three years of free-air CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  B Gielen; C Calfapietra; M Lukac; V E Wittig; P De Angelis; I A Janssens; M C Moscatelli; S Grego; M F Cotrufo; D L Godbold; M R Hoosbeek; S P Long; F Miglietta; A Polle; C J Bernacchi; P A Davey; R Ceulemans; G E Scarascia-Mugnozza
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation.

Authors:  C Calfapietra; B Gielen; A N J Galema; M Lukac; P De Angelis; M C Moscatelli; R Ceulemans; G Scarascia-Mugnozza
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 7.  Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future.

Authors:  Stephen P Long; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Alistair Rogers; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

8.  Radiation-use efficiency of a forest exposed to elevated concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Evan H DeLucia; Kate George; Jason G Hamilton
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Leaf dynamics of a deciduous forest canopy: no response to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Johnna D Sholtis; Carla A Gunderson; Sara S Jawdy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Joanne Ledford; Carolyn D Reilly; Nicole E Miller; Elizabeth G O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  85 in total

1.  Does enhanced photosynthesis enhance growth? Lessons learned from CO2 enrichment studies.

Authors:  Miko U F Kirschbaum
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Feedback of trees on nitrogen mineralization to restrict the advance of trees in C4 savannahs.

Authors:  Steven I Higgins; Moagi Keretetse; Edmund C February
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Canopy leaf area constrains [CO2]-induced enhancement of productivity and partitioning among aboveground carbon pools.

Authors:  Heather R McCarthy; Ram Oren; Adrien C Finzi; Kurt H Johnsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems.

Authors:  Marko Scholze; Wolfgang Knorr; Nigel W Arnell; I Colin Prentice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Jeffrey M Warren; Colleen M Iversen; Belinda E Medlyn; Ross E McMurtrie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Implications of a large global root biomass for carbon sink estimates and for soil carbon dynamics.

Authors:  David Robinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dominant factors controlling glacial and interglacial variations in the treeline elevation in tropical Africa.

Authors:  Haibin Wu; Joël Guiot; Simon Brewer; Zhengtang Guo; Changhui Peng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends.

Authors:  Shilong Piao; Pierre Friedlingstein; Philippe Ciais; Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré; David Labat; Sönke Zaehle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Tropospheric Ozone on Phytochemical Composition of Trembling Aspen ( Populus tremuloides ) and Paper Birch ( Betula papyrifera ).

Authors:  John J Couture; Timothy D Meehan; Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 10.  Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on forests: phytochemistry, trophic interactions, and ecosystem dynamics.

Authors:  Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.